CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ewen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bart, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ewen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bart, B. B.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 52:524-529 (2005)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2005

Obstetrical and Pediatric Anesthesia

The ankle clonus test is not a clinically useful measure of spinal cord integrity in children

[Le test du clonus du pied n’est pas une mesure cliniquement utile de l’intégrité de la moelle épinière chez les enfants]

Alastair Ewen, MB CHB FRCA FRCPC, Robin G. Cox, MB BS MRCP(UK) FRCA FRCPC, Sîon A. Davies, MB BS FANZCA, Jeremy B. Luntley, MB BS FRCA, Yair Rubin, MD FRCPC, Gordon H. Fick, BSc MSc PhD and Bevin B. Bart, MD FRCPC

From the Division of Pediatric Anesthesia, Alberta Children’s Hospital at the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Robin Cox, Division of Pediatric Anesthesia, Alberta Children’s Hospital at the University of Calgary, 1820 Richmond Road SW, Calgary, Alberta T2T 5C7, Canada. Phone: 403-943 7260; Fax: 403-943 7606; E-mail: robin.cox{at}calgaryhealthregion.ca

Purpose: Bilateral flexion-induced ankle clonus has been proposed as a test of spinal cord integrity during anesthesia for scoliosis surgery. The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability of this test in normal children emerging from volatile anesthesia. A secondary objective was to determine if there was a difference in the validity of this test with either sevoflurane or isoflurane anesthesia.

Methods: In a randomized, prospective blinded clinical trial, 32 healthy children aged three to 13 yr, were randomized to receive either isoflurane (Group I, n = 15) or sevoflurane (Group S, n = 17) for maintenance of anesthesia during dental restorative surgery. During emergence, an observer, blinded to group allocation, recorded ankle clonus scores (number of beats to a maximum of 5 on each side) at 60-sec intervals until tracheal extubation. End-tidal anesthetic concentration was measured contemporaneously.

Results: Non-sustained ankle clonus was elicited in a majority of children during emergence: 13 (87%) patients in Group I and 15 (88%) in Group S demonstrated at least non-sustained or unilateral clonus. However, bilateral sustained (> 5 beats·min–1) ankle clonus occurred in only four (27%) patients in Group I and four (24%) patients in Group S (P = 0.83).

Conclusion: We conclude that the specificity of the ankle clonus test is too low to be clinically useful as a measure of spinal cord integrity in children, both when isoflurane and sevoflurane are used as the primary anesthetic agent.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.