This Article Résumé de cet Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Additional Material Submit a scholarly reply Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Joo, H. S. Articles by Savoldelli, G. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Joo, H. S. Articles by Savoldelli, G. L.

The value of screening preoperative chest x-rays: a systematic review

[La valeur des radiographies pulmonaires de dépistage préopératoire : une revue systématique]

Hwan S. Joo, MD FRCPC^*, Jean Wong, MD FRCPC, Viren N. Naik, MD Med FRCPC^* and Georges L. Savoldelli, MD^*

^* From the Departments of Anesthesia, St. Michael’s Hospital, and
the Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Hwan Joo, Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto M5B 1W8, Canada. Phone: 416-864-5071; Fax: 416-864-6014; E-mail: jooh{at}smh.toronto.on.ca

Purpose: Chest x-ray (CXR) is the most frequently ordered radiological test in Canada. Despite published guidelines, variable policies exist amongst different hospitals for ordering of preoperative CXRs. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on the value of screening CXRs and establish evidence to support guidelines for the use of preoperative screening CXRs.

Source: Medline and Embase were searched under set terms for all English language articles published during 1966–2004. All eligible studies were reviewed and data were extracted individually by two authors. Of the 513 articles identified, 14 studies met both inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Principal findings: The quality of published evidence was modest as only six of the studies were rated as fair and eight as poor. Of the reported studies, diagnostic yield increased with age. However, most of the abnormalities consisted of chronic disorders such as cardiomegaly and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (up to 65%). The rate of subsequent investigations was highly variable (4–47%). When further investigations were performed, the proportion of patients who had a change in management was low (10% of investigated patients). Postoperative pulmonary complications were also similar between patients who had preoperative CXRs (12.8%) and patients who did not (16%).

Conclusion: An association between preoperative screening CXRs and decrease in morbidity or mortality could not be established. As the prevalence of CXR abnormalities is low in patients under the age of 70, there is fair evidence that routine CXRs should not be performed for patients in this age group without risk factors. For patients over 70, there is insufficient evidence for or against performance of routine CXRs. The current recommendation from the Guidelines Association Committee that routine CXRs should not be performed for patients over 70 without risk factors is supported by this study.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. R. Bapoje, J. F. Whitaker, T. Schulz, E. S. Chu, and R. K. Albert Preoperative Evaluation of the Patient With Pulmonary Disease Chest, November 1, 2007; 132(5): 1637 - 1645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. W. Smetana A 68-Year-Old Man With COPD Contemplating Colon Cancer Surgery JAMA, May 16, 2007; 297(19): 2121 - 2130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Hamilton Preoperative testing. Can J Anesth, March 1, 2006; 53(3): 326 - 327. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Bryson Has preoperative testing become a habit?/L'administration de tests preoperatoires est-elle devenue une habitude? Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(6): 557 - 561. [Full Text] [PDF]