CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cook, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, M.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 52:630-633 (2005)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2005

Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Respiration and Airway

The ProsealTM LMA is a useful rescue device during failed rapid sequence intubation: two additional cases

[Le ML ProsealTM est un instrument de secours utile pour l’intubation pendant une induction à séquence rapide : deux nouveaux cas]

Tim M. Cook, FRCA, Tony S. Brooks, FANZCA, Joreline Van der Westhuizen, MB CH.B and Michael Clarke, MB CH.B

From the Department of Anaesthesia, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath, United Kingdom.

Address correspondence to: Dr. T. M. Cook, Dept of Anaesthesia, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath, BA1 3NG, UK. Phone: +44 1225 825056; Fax: +44 1225 825061; E-mail: timcook{at}ukgateway.net

Purpose: We report two cases where the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) was successfully used as a rescue device, after failed tracheal intubation, during rapid sequence induction.

Clinical findings: The first case involved a 31-yr-old primigravida presenting for emergency Cesarean section for severe fetal distress. She had a grade 3 larynx and airway edema was observed during laryngoscopy. Attempts with a McCoy blade and gum elastic bougie failed to secure the airway. A size 4 PLMA was inserted with good airway control and surgery proceeded uneventfully. The second case involved a 51-yr-old man presenting for appendectomy. Following failed attempts at intubation, a size 5 PLMA was succesful in securing his airway and surgery proceeded uneventfully.

Conclusions: The correctly placed PLMA has potential advantages over the cLMA for airway rescue in the circumstance of failed emergency intubation in a patient with a potentially full stomach. In the two cases reported, the PLMA provided effective rescue of the airway.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. M. Cook and B. Gibbison
Analysis of 1000 consecutive uses of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airwayTM by one anaesthetist at a district general hospital
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2007; 99(3): 436 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
T. M. Cook, G. Lee, and J. P. Nolan
The ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature: [Le masque larynge ProSealTM : un examen des publications]
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2005; 52(7): 739 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
E. Crosby
The unanticipated difficult airway - evolving strategies for successful salvage/L'intubation difficile imprevue - evolution des strategies d'un sauvetage reussi
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(6): 562 - 567.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.