This Article Résumé de cet Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a scholarly reply Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Katz, R. I. Articles by Vitkun, S. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Katz, R. I. Articles by Vitkun, S. A.

Preoperative medical consultations: impact on perioperative management and surgical outcome

[Consultations médicales préopératoires : conséquence sur la prise en charge péri-opératoire et les suites opératoires]

From the Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, USA.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Robert I. Katz, Department of Anesthesiology, S.U.N.Y. at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, N.Y. 11794, USA. Phone: 631-444-2975; Fax: 631-444-2907; E-mail: rikatz{at}aol.com

Purpose: This study was designed to assess the effect of preoperative medical consults on both perioperative management and surgical outcome.

Methods: The charts of 387 consecutive patients over the age of 50 undergoing non-cardiac, elective surgery during a six-week period were retrospectively examined. Patient factors including age, ASA status, gender, type of surgery, outcome (death, unexpected intensive care unit admission or uncomplicated discharge), presence of medical consult, and, in those cases where a medical consult was present, stated reason for the consult, the ordering physician, and recommendations of the consultant, were recorded.

Results: 138 patients receiving medical consults (35.7%) were identified (a total of 146 consults). The most common stated purpose of the consults examined was "preoperative evaluation." In only five consults (3.4%) did the consultant identify a new finding. Sixty-two consults (42.5%) contained no recommendations. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between those patients who received a medical consult and those who did not.

Conclusion: A review of 146 medical consults suggests that the majority of such consults give little advice that truly impacts either perioperative management or outcome of surgery.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): e418 - e499. [Full Text] [PDF]