CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michaud, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hemmerling, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michaud, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hemmerling, T. M.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 52:795-800 (2005)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2005

General Anesthesia

Monitoring neuromuscular blockade at the vastus medialis muscle using phonomyography

[Le monitorage du bloc neuromusculaire du muscle vaste interne du membre inférieur avec phonomyographie]

Guillaume Michaud, Guillaume Trager, MSc, Stéphane Deschamps, MSc and Thomas M. Hemmerling, MD DEAA

From the Neuromuscular Research Group (NRG), Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM) Hôtel-Dieu, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. T. M. Hemmerling, Department of Anesthesiology, Université de Montréal, Hôtel-Dieu, 3840, rue St-Urbain, Montréal, Québec H2W 1T8, Canada. Phone: 514-890-8000, ext. 14570; Fax: 514-412-7222; E-mail: thomashemmerling_2000{at}yahoo.com

Purpose: The vastus medialis muscle has been recently proposed as a new site for monitoring neuromuscular blockade (NMB). The purpose of this study is to compare NMB at the vastus medialis with the adductor pollicis muscle using phonomyography (PMG).

Methods: Fifteen patients were enrolled in the study. Anesthesia was induced with remifentanil 0.25 to 0.5 µg·kg–1·min–, followed by propofol 2 to 2.5 mg–1·kg–1 iv. Analgesia was provided by remifentanil 0.05 to 0.25 µg·kg–1·min–1 iv throughout surgery. A small piezo-electric microphone was attached to the middle of the thenar mass of the right hand to record acoustic signals produced by the contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle. A second microphone was fixed to the medial part of the thigh, 10 cm over the patella, to record the response from the vastus medialis muscle. The ulnar nerve and the im branches of the femoral nerve were stimulated using train-of-four stimulation every 12 sec. Onset, maximum effect, and offset of neuromuscular block were measured after mivacurium 0.2 mg·kg–1 iv and compared.

Results: At the vastus medialis muscle, the onset of NMB was significantly shorter at 1.9 ± 0.6 min vs 2.8 ± 0.7 min, the maximum effect less pronounced at 85 ± 11% vs 96 ± 2% and recovery of NMB to 25%, 75%, 90% of twitch control height more rapid than at the adductor pollicis muscle at 17 ± 2.2 min vs 21.6 ± 4.2 min, 26.7 ± 6.5 vs 21 ± 4.1 min and 30.7 ± 6.6 vs 35.9 ± 7.1 min, respectively.

Conclusions: PMG can be used to measure NMB at the vastus medialis muscle. We found a shorter onset time, less pronounced maximum effect and more rapid recovery of NMB at the vastus medialis muscle than at the adductor pollicis muscle.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
T. M. Hemmerling and N. Le
Brief review: Neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician: [Article de synthese court : Monitorage neuromusculaire : une mise a jour pour le clinicien]
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2007; 54(1): 58 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.