This Article Résumé de cet Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a scholarly reply Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, A. F. Articles by Mort, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, A. F. Articles by Mort, M.

Communication between anesthesiologists, patients and the anesthesia team: a descriptive study of induction and emergence

[Communication entre anesthésiologistes, patients et équipe d’anesthésie : une étude descriptive de l’induction et du retour à la conscience]

Andrew F. Smith, MRCP (UK), FRCA^*, Catherine Pope, PhD, Dawn Goodwin, PhD and Maggie Mort, PhD

^* From the Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster;
the School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, Southampton; and
the Institute for Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

Address correspondence to: Pr. Andrew Smith, Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster LA1 4RP, UK, Phone: (01524) 583517; Fax (01524) 583519; E-mail: Andrew.f.smith{at}mbht.nhs.uk

Purpose: Although the importance of communication skills in anesthetic practice is increasingly recognized, formal communication skills training has hitherto dealt only with limited aspects of this professional activity. We aimed to document and analyze the informally-learned communication that takes place between anesthesia personnel and patients at induction of and emergence from general anesthesia.

Methods: We adopted an ethnographic approach based principally on observation of anesthesia personnel at work in the operating theatres with subsequent analysis of observation transcripts.

Results: We noted three main styles of communication on induction, commonly combined in a single induction. In order of frequency, these were: (1) descriptive, where the anesthesiologists explained to the patient what he/she might expect to feel; (2) functional, which seemed designed to help anesthesiologists maintain physiological stability or assess the changing depth of anesthesia and (3) evocative, which referred to images or metaphors. Although the talk we have described is nominally directed at the patient, it also signifies to other members of the anesthetic team how induction is progressing. The team may also contribute to the communication behaviour depending on the context. Communication on emergence usually focused on establishing that the patient was awake.

Conclusion: Communication at induction and emergence tends to fall into specific patterns with different emphases but similar functions. This communication work is shared across the anesthetic team. Further work could usefully explore the relationship between communication styles and team performance or indicators of patient safety or well-being.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. F. Smith, C. Pope, D. Goodwin, and M. Mort Interprofessional handover and patient safety in anaesthesia: observational study of handovers in the recovery room Br. J. Anaesth., June 13, 2008; (2008) aen168v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Dutt-Gupta, T. Bown, and A. M. Cyna Effect of communication on pain during intravenous cannulation: a randomized controlled trial Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2007; 99(6): 871 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. F. Smith Reaching the parts that are hard to reach: expanding the scope of professional education in anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2007; 99(4): 453 - 456. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Angus Ethnographic research applied to anesthesia/La recherche ethnographique appliquee a l'anesthesie Can J Anesth, November 1, 2005; 52(9): 899 - 903. [Full Text] [PDF]