CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ahn, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ahn, H. J.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 52:958-962 (2005)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2005

Regional Anesthesia and Pain

Hypobaric spinal anesthesia with 0.2% tetracaine for total joint hip arthroplasy

[La rachianesthésie hypobare avec de la tétracaïne à 0,2 % pour l’arthroplastie totale de hanche]

Jie Ae Kim, MD PhD and Hyun Joo Ahn, MD

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Hyun Joo Ahn, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 135-710, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-ku, Seoul, Korea. Phone: 82-2-3410-0784; Fax: 82-2-3410-0361; E-mail: hjahn{at}smc.samsung.co.kr

Purpose: Hypobaric local anesthetics for total hip replacement (THR) have potential advantages related to body position and differential block. However, the dose requirements of hypobaric local anesthetics for THR have not been clearly established. Therefore, we undertook a dose-response study of hypobaric tetracaine for THR.

Methods: In a randomized, controlled, and double-blinded manner, three groups of 20 patients each undergoing THR received spinal anesthesia using either 10, 12, or 14 mg of 0.2% hypobaric tetracaine in a lateral decubitus position, with the operated side up. Adequate anesthesia was defined as: 1) upper sensory block between T10 and T4; 2) motor block of modified Bromage scale 2 or 3; and 3) time to sensory remission to the L2 level of more than three hours.

Results: The number of patients who achieved adequate sensory and motor block levels was similar amongst the three groups. However, all patients who received 14 mg had a sensory remission time to L2 of more than three hours while only 30% of the patients in the 12 mg group and no patient in the 10 mg group had the same remission time. A significant differential block was observed between the non-dependent and the dependent sides, but the degree of differential block was not different between the groups.

Conclusion: 10 to 14 mg of 0.2% hypobaric tetracaine achieved similar and adequate block levels, but different regression times. To ensure complete sensory block duration for THR, we recommend using 14 mg of 0.2% hypobaric tetracaine.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.