CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zohar, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fredman, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zohar, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fredman, B.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 53:20-25 (2006)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2006

General Anesthesia

Bispectral index monitoring does not improve early recovery of geriatric outpatients undergoing brief surgical procedures

[Le monitorage avec l’index bispectral n’améliore pas la récupération précoce des patients ambulatoires âgés après une opération brève]

Edna Zohar, MD*, Ilia Luban, MD*, Paul F. White, PhD MD{dagger}, Erez Ramati, MD*, Shay Shabat, MD* and Brian Fredman, MB BCH*

* From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Meir Hospital, Kfar Saba, Israel and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; and
{dagger} the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Address correspondence to: Dr. P.F. White, Professor and Holder of the Margaret Milam McDermott Distinguished Chair in Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management; UT Southwestern Medical Center; 5323 Harry Hines Blvd; Dallas, Texas 75390-9068, USA. Phone: 214-648-6424; Fax: 214-648-2920; E-mail:paul.white{at}utsouthwestern.edu

Purpose: To assess if titration of sevoflurane using the bispectral index (BIS) monitor improves the early and intermediate recovery in geriatric outpatients undergoing brief urologic procedures under general anesthesia without muscle relaxants.

Methods: After a standardized induction with propofol and fentanyl, a laryngeal mask airway was inserted and sevoflurane was administered in combination with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen for maintenance of anesthesia in spontaneously breathing outpatients. In the Control group (n = 25), sevoflurane and fentanyl were titrated according to standard clinical practice. In the BIS-directed group (n = 25), sevoflurane was titrated to maintain a BIS value between 50 and 60, and supplemental fentanyl, 25 µg iv boluses were administered to treat tachypnea. The intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic requirements, as well as the times to eye opening, removal of the laryngeal mask airway device, response to simple commands, orientation to person and place, and postanesthesia care unit discharge eligibility (fast-track score of 14) were assessed at specific time intervals.

Results: The minimum alveolar concentration-hour of sevoflurane (0.25 ± 0.15 and 0.31 ± 0.2) and end-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane at the end of surgery (0.3 ± 0.3 and 0.4 ± 0.20%) did not differ significantly between the Control and BIS-directed groups, respectively. Although the percentage of patients requiring supplemental boluses of fentanyl was reduced in the BIS-directed group (16 vs 48%, P <0.05), the intraoperative BIS values and recovery times were similar in the two groups.

Conclusion: In this non-paralyzed elderly outpatient surgery population, the use of BIS monitoring for titrating the maintenance anesthetic (sevoflurane) failed to improve the early recovery process.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
I. Rundshagen, T. Hardt, K. Cortina, F. Pragst, T. Fritzsche, and C. Spies
Narcotrend-assisted propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia vs clinical practice: does it make a difference?
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2007; 99(5): 686 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White, H. Kehlet, J. M. Neal, T. Schricker, D. B. Carr, F. Carli, and the Fast-Track Surgery Study Group
The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1380 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Mayer, J. Boldt, A. Schellhaass, B. Hiller, and S. W. Suttner
Bispectral Index-Guided General Anesthesia in Combination with Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Reduces Recovery Time in Fast-Track Colon Surgery
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1145 - 1149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. Young and J. Griffiths
Clinical trials of monitoring in anaesthesia, critical care and acute ward care: a review
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2006; 97(1): 39 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.