CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pandin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Vandesteene, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pandin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Vandesteene, A.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 53:67-72 (2006)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2006

Regional Anesthesia and Pain

Somatosensory evoked potentials as an objective assessment of the sensory median nerve blockade after infraclavicular block

[Les potentiels évoqués somesthésiques comme évaluation objective du bloc sensitif du nerf médian après un bloc sous-claviculaire]

Pierre Pandin, MD*, Jean Corentin Salengros, MD*, Alain d’Hollander, MD PhD{dagger}, Christiane Tchekap, MD* and Arlette Vandesteene, MD PhD*

* From the Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; and
{dagger} the Division of Anesthesiology, Cantonal University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Pierre C. Pandin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Erasmus Hospital, Lennik Drive 808, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium. Phone: +32-2-555-39-19; Fax: +32-2-555-43-63; E-mail: ppandin{at}ulb.ac.be

Purpose: Median nerve somatosensory evoked responses (MnSSER) alterations were compared to clinical tests (cold and pinprick) variations, in 20 ASA I adult patients following infraclavicular block obtained with 40 mL ropivacaine 0.5% to assess first, the difference of time course of the respective electrophysiological and clinical signs, and second, the objectivity and the reproducibility of MnSSER changes.

Clinical features: Four MnSSER derivations (Erb’s point; cutaneous projection of peripheral end of brachial plexus; posterior neck at C6 level, frontal and controlateral parietal scalp) were monitored and recorded for retrospective analysis. Continuous data acquisition were started before ropivacaine injection (baseline) and maintained for 30 min thereafter. Every three minutes after ropivacaine injection, cold and pinprick tests were performed in the hand median nerve cutaneous supply zone and were assessed using a sensory visual score (varying from 0–10). Data were compared using analysis of variance. Although MnSSER values were stable during baseline period, after ropivacaine administration, severe progressive amplitude depressions of selected MnSSER were detected in every patient. While clinical cold and pinprick tests became positive (score > 8) only 15.8 ± 1.2 min and 20.1 ± 1.8 min respectively after ropivacaine administration, the mean time to observe the earliest MnSSER 20% amplitude decrease at Erb’s point derivation was reduced to 5.6 ± 1.1 min (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Selected MnSSER amplitude reduction indicates objectively the onset of median nerve anesthesia following infraclavicular brachial plexus block before the appearance of clinical signs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.