CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in CJA
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cereda, C. M. S.
Right arrow Articles by de Paula, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cereda, C. M. S.
Right arrow Articles by de Paula, E.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 53:1092-1097 (2006)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2006

Regional Anesthesia and Pain

Liposomal formulations of prilocaine, lidocaine and mepivacaine prolong analgesic duration

[Des préparations liposomiques de prilocaïne, de lidocaïne et de mépivacaïne prolongent la durée de l’analgésie]

Cíntia Maria Saia Cereda, PhD, Giovana Bruschini Brunetto, MSc, Daniele Ribeiro de Araújo, PhD and Eneida de Paula, PhD

From the Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Biology, State University of Campinas – UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Eneida de Paula, Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Biologia, UNICAMP, C. P. 6109, CEP 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Phone: +55 19 3788 6143; Fax: +55 19 3788 6129; E-mail: depaula{at}unicamp.br

Purpose: A laboratory investigation was undertaken to compare the in vivo antinociceptive effects of 2% liposomal formulations of prilocaine (PLC), lidocaine (LDC) and mepivacaine (MVC) compared to plain solutions of each of these three local anesthetics.

Methods: Large unilamellar vesicles were prepared by extrusion (400 nm), at pH 7.4. The membrane/water partition coefficients were obtained from encapsulation efficiency values, after incorporation of each local anesthetic to the vesicles. The anesthetic effect of each liposomal formulation was compared to the respective local anesthetic solution in water, using the infraorbital nerve-blockade test, in rats.

Results: The partition coefficients were: 57 for PLC, 114 for LDC and 93 for MVC. In vivo results showed that local anesthetic-free liposomes, used as control, had no analgesic effect. In contrast, the encapsulated formulations induced increased intensities of total anesthetic effect (35.3%, 26.1% and 57.1%) and time for recovery (percentage increases of 30%, 23.1% and 56%), respectively, for PLC, LDC and MVC when compared to the plain solutions (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: These results indicate that liposomes provide effective drug-delivery systems for intermediate-duration local anesthetics. Mepivacaine was affected to the greatest extent, while LDC benefited least from liposome encapsulation, possibly due to greater vasodilatory properties of LDC.


Related articles in CJA:

Drug transformation: Advances in drug delivery systems/La transformation des médicaments par de nouveaux vecteurs
Orlando Hung
CJA 2006 53: 1074-1077. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
P. Beaulieu
Non-opioid strategies for acute pain management
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2007; 54(6): 481 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
O. Hung
Drug transformation: Advances in drug delivery systems/La transformation des medicaments par de nouveaux vecteurs.
Can J Anesth, November 1, 2006; 53(11): 1074 - 1077.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.