| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

* From the Division of Pediatric Anesthesia, Alberta Childrens Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; and the
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Robin G. Cox, Division of Pediatric Anesthesia, Alberta Childrens Hospital, 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada. Phone: 403-955-7260; Fax: 403-955-7606; E-mail: robin.cox{at}calgaryhealthregion.ca
Purpose: The purpose of this evidence-based clinical update was to identify the best evidence to determine if behavioural outcomes are improved in children after oral midazolam premedication.
Methods: A literature search was conducted using both PubMed and OVID programs, utilizing the terms "midazolam", and either "premedication" or "preoperative treatment". Search limits that were employed included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), English language, human studies, children aged 018 yr, and publication dates 1990 present (January 2006). A review of the 171 abstracts obtained was undertaken and, of these, 30 papers were identified that concerned oral midazolam in children prior to general anesthesia, and that involved a RCT with a placebo or control arm. These studies were assigned levels of evidence, and grades of recommendation were made according to Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria.
Results: Oral midazolam premedication in children was found to reduce the anxiety associated with separation from parents/guardians, and with induction of anesthesia. Recovery times are not significantly delayed. There is no consistent evidence to suggest a reduction in the phenomenon of emergence agitation. Evidence suggesting an improvement in behavioural outcomes at home is also inconsistent.
Conclusion: Premedication with midazolam 0.5 mg·kg1 po administered 2030 min preoperatively, is effective in reducing both separation and induction anxiety in children (grade A recommendation), with minimal effect on recovery times. However improved postoperative behavioural outcomes in the postanesthesia care unit, or at home cannot be predicted on a consistent basis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. M. Yuen, T. W. Hui, M. G. Irwin, and M. K. Yuen A Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Midazolam for Premedication in Pediatric Anesthesia: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1715 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Cox Anesthetic management of pediatric adenotonsillectomy Can J Anesth, December 1, 2007; 54(12): 1021 - 1025. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |