CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Crowe, M.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cox, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Crowe, M.-J.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 53:1213-1219 (2006)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2006

Obstetrical and Pediatric Anesthesia

Evidence-based clinical update: Does premedication with oral midazolam lead to improved behavioural outcomes in children?

[Mise à jour basée sur des données probantes : Améliore-t-on le comportement des enfants par une prémédication au midazolam par la bouche ?]

Robin G. Cox, MB BS MRCP(UK) FRCA FRCPC*, Ulyana Nemish, BSc MSc*, Alastair Ewen, MB ChB FRCA FRCPC* and Marie-Josée Crowe, MD FRCPC{dagger}

* From the Division of Pediatric Anesthesia, Alberta Children’s Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; and the
{dagger} Department of Anesthesiology, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Robin G. Cox, Division of Pediatric Anesthesia, Alberta Children’s Hospital, 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada. Phone: 403-955-7260; Fax: 403-955-7606; E-mail: robin.cox{at}calgaryhealthregion.ca

Purpose: The purpose of this evidence-based clinical update was to identify the best evidence to determine if behavioural outcomes are improved in children after oral midazolam premedication.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using both PubMed and OVID programs, utilizing the terms "midazolam", and either "premedication" or "preoperative treatment". Search limits that were employed included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), English language, human studies, children aged 0–18 yr, and publication dates 1990 – present (January 2006). A review of the 171 abstracts obtained was undertaken and, of these, 30 papers were identified that concerned oral midazolam in children prior to general anesthesia, and that involved a RCT with a placebo or control arm. These studies were assigned levels of evidence, and grades of recommendation were made according to Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria.

Results: Oral midazolam premedication in children was found to reduce the anxiety associated with separation from parents/guardians, and with induction of anesthesia. Recovery times are not significantly delayed. There is no consistent evidence to suggest a reduction in the phenomenon of emergence agitation. Evidence suggesting an improvement in behavioural outcomes at home is also inconsistent.

Conclusion: Premedication with midazolam 0.5 mg·kg–1 po administered 20–30 min preoperatively, is effective in reducing both separation and induction anxiety in children (grade A recommendation), with minimal effect on recovery times. However improved postoperative behavioural outcomes in the postanesthesia care unit, or at home cannot be predicted on a consistent basis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
V. M. Yuen, T. W. Hui, M. G. Irwin, and M. K. Yuen
A Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Midazolam for Premedication in Pediatric Anesthesia: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1715 - 1721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
R. G. Cox
Anesthetic management of pediatric adenotonsillectomy
Can J Anesth, December 1, 2007; 54(12): 1021 - 1025.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.