This Article Résumé de cet Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a scholarly reply Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Morimoto, Y. Articles by Niwa, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morimoto, Y. Articles by Niwa, H.

Nasotracheal intubation under curve-tipped suction catheter guidance reduces epistaxis

[L’intubation nasotrachéale guidée par un cathéter d’aspiration à extrémité cour-bée réduit l’épistaxis]

From the Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Yoshinari Morimoto, Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka University, 1-8, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. Phone: +81 6 6879 2972; Fax: +81 6 6879 2975; E-mail: ysn-mori{at}dent.osaka-u.ac.jp

Background: Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) has greater potential for trauma of nasopharyngeal mucosa than orotracheal intubation. The present study investigated the success rate of NTI and frequency of nasal bleeding using a curve-tipped suction catheter (CTSC) to guide nasotracheal tube advancement.

Methods: Subjects comprised 131 adult patients who under-went NTI. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups: a) NTI under CTSC guidance (G[+] group). The CTSC (14 Fr) was first inserted through the tracheal tube, with the tip of the CTSC emerging from the distal end of the tube. The curved tip was directed ventrally. Both tracheal tube and CTSC were advanced together through the nasopharynx; b) NTI without CTSC guidance (G[–] group). The tracheal tube was advanced into the nasal cavity and passed into the pharynx without CTSC guidance. The time required to pass the endotracheal tube through the nasal cavity (nasal passage time), success rate of nasal passage with nasotracheal tube, and the incidence and severity of nasal bleeding were compared.

Results: Success rate for nasal passage was 100% in the G(+) group (62/62) and 82.6% in the G(–) group (57/69; P = 0.0006). Frequency of nasal bleeding was significantly lower in the G(+) group (21/62, 33.9%) than in the G(–) group (37/69, 53.6%; P = 0.023). Severity of nasal bleeding was also significantly lower in the G(+) group than in the G(–) group (P = 0.030).

Conclusions: Nasotracheal intubation under CTSC guidance increases the success rate of airway instrumentation, and also reduces the incidence and severity of epistaxis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Uria, K. Kost, T. Schricker, and S. B. Backman Case report: Nasotracheal intubation - look before leaping to assess the laryngeal view: [Presentation de cas : Intubation nasotracheale : observer avant de se precipiter pour evaluer la vue laryngee] Can J Anesth, May 1, 2008; 55(5): 302 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]