CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Villeneuve, V.
Right arrow Articles by Deschamps, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Villeneuve, V.
Right arrow Articles by Deschamps, A.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 53:380-384 (2006)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2006

Obstetrical and Pediatric Anesthesia

Anesthetic management of a labouring parturient with urticaria pigmentosa

[Anesthésie d’une parturiente en travail, atteinte d’urticaire pigmentaire]

Valérie Villeneuve, MD*, Ian Kaufman, MD{dagger}, Sally Weeks, MD{dagger} and Alain Deschamps, PhD MD{dagger}

* From the Centre Universitaire de Santé de l’Estrie (CUSE), Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke; and the
{dagger} McGill University Health Center (MUHC), Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Alain Deschamps, 687 Pine Avenue West, Royal Victoria Hospital, Room S5.05, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1A1, Canada. Phone: 514-934-1934, ex: 34880; Fax: 514-843-1723; E-mail: alain.deschamps{at}staff.mcgill.ca

Purpose: To report the anesthetic management of labour pain and Cesarean section in a patient with urticaria pigmentosa at risk for systemic mastocytosis.

Clinical: A 37-yr-old patient with a history of urticaria pigmentosa and an allergic reaction to a local anesthetic agent was seen in consultation at 36 weeks gestation. She previously tested negative for an allergy test to lidocaine. Recommendations to avoid systemic mastocytosis included: avoidance of histamine-releasing drugs, using lidocaine for labour epidural, and regional anesthesia in case of a Cesarean section. The patient presented at term in labour. Intravenous fentanyl was used for early labour, followed by a combined spinal-epidural. The spinal contained lidocaine and fentanyl, but because of pruritus, the epidural infusion contained lidocaine only. Most likely because of tachyphylaxis to lidocaine, an epidural bolus of lidocaine with epinephrine failed to provide adequate anesthesia for a Cesarean section. The block was supplemented with nitrous oxide by mask, with fentanyl postdelivery. Postoperative pain control was managed with an epidural infusion of lidocaine and fentanyl for three days. The patient was discharged without complications four days postsurgery.

Conclusion: Proper allergy testing prior to pregnancy is important to help the management of labour pain and anesthesia for Cesarean section in a patient at risk for systemic mastocytosis.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.