This Article Résumé de cet Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a scholarly reply Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chin, K. J. Articles by Chee, V. W.T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chin, K. J. Articles by Chee, V. W.T.

Laryngeal edema associated with the ProSeal^TM laryngeal mask airway in upper respiratory tract infection

[dème laryngé associé au masque laryngé ProSeal^TM dans une infection des voies respiratoires supérieures]

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Ki Jinn Chin, Department of Anesthesiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore 308433, Republic of Singapore. E-mail: gasgenie{at}yahoo.co.uk

Purpose: We report an unusual case of vocal cord edema associated with the use of a ProSeal^TM laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in an adult patient with an undiagnosed upper respiratory tract infection (URTI).

Clinical features: A 55-yr-old woman had fixation of a radial fracture under general anesthesia with muscle relaxation. She developed audible wheezing 30 min after PLMA insertion. Bronchoscopic examination revealed significant vocal cord edema. Adequate ventilation was possible at increased airway pressures, and the administration of dexamethasone 4 mg iv produced clinical resolution of the stridor and airway obstruction. The patient admitted to having mild symptoms of an URTI on postoperative questioning.

Conclusion: Airway hyperreactivity secondary to the URTI is the most likely etiological factor; other possibilities include trauma from insertion and chemical irritation. Although pediatric studies suggest that the LMA-Classic^TM carries less risk than endotracheal intubation in the presence of URTI, this case report demonstrates that caution is still warranted when using supraglottic airways. The PLMA permitted effective ventilation despite increased airway resistance; nevertheless its role in patients with URTI is unclear. It is possible that the bulkier cuff design of the PLMA, compared to that of the LMA-Classic^TM, may have partly contributed to the development of edema in this setting.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. S. Stix, C. J. O'Connor Jr, and D. R. Valade The ProSeal LMA does not cause laryngeal edema. Can J Anesth, September 1, 2006; 53(9): 961 - 963. [Full Text] [PDF]