This Article Résumé de cet Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a scholarly reply Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kimberger, O. Articles by Mayer, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kimberger, O. Articles by Mayer, N.

Lower flange modification improves performance of the Macintosh, but not the Miller laryngoscope blade

[La modification de la partie inférieure du manche améliore la performance de la lame du laryngoscope Macintosh, mais non celle du Miller.]

Oliver Kimberger, MD^*, Lukas Fischer, MD^*, Christina Plank and Nikolaus Mayer, MD^*

^* From the Departments of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care, and
Radiology University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Oliver Kimberger, Department of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care, University of Vienna Medical School, A-1090 Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Austria. Phone: +43-40400-4100; Mobile: +41-764701033; Fax: +43-40400-4104. E-mail: study{at}kimberger.at

Purpose: In order to minimize the potential for dental damage and to improve laryngeal visualization during tracheal intubation, two commonly used laryngoscope blades were modified and compared in a clinical setting: the Miller laryngoscope blade and the Macintosh laryngoscope blade. Modified versions of both laryngoscope blades with a lowered heel (Callander modification) at the proximal end of the blade were compared to standard blades.

Methods: Forty patients scheduled for general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation were studied prospectively. Preoperatively, the patients’ airways were evaluated according to Mallampati score, thyromental distance and interincisor gap. After induction of anesthesia laryngoscopy was performed with the original laryngoscope and its modified counterpart in random order. A lateral x-ray of the neck was taken after the optimal view had been obtained, and blade-tooth distance, laryngeal view, blade-tooth contact and need for assistance were measured. Using angular calculations the laryngoscopes were analyzed at different insertion depths on graph paper, and the results were compared with data from the lateral x-rays.

Results: With a modified Macintosh blade the blade-tooth distance was significantly greater in comparison to the original design (2.5 ± 2.1 cm vs 0.2 ± 0.1 cm, P < 0.01). Consequently the number of blade-tooth contacts was significantly lower (20% vs 75%, P < 0.05). The best laryngeal view could be obtained using a modified Macintosh laryngoscope. With a modified Miller laryngoscope laryngeal visibility was not improved and assistance was required more often to achieve adequate intubating conditions (35% vs 5%, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: A reduction of the proximal flange of a Miller blade decreases the blade’s effectiveness for laryngeal visualization, whereas a similar modification of a Macintosh blade increases blade-tooth distance, decreases the number of blade-tooth contacts and provides a better laryngeal view.