CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in CJA
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, V. W.S.
Right arrow Articles by Abbas, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, V. W.S.
Right arrow Articles by Abbas, S.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 54:176-182 (2007)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2007

Reports of Original Investigations

Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block

[L’échoguidage améliore le taux de succès du bloc axillaire du plexus brachial]

Vincent W.S. Chan, MD FRCPS*,{dagger}, Anahi Perlas, MD FRCPC*,{dagger}, Colin J.L. McCartney, MBChB FRCA FFARCSI FRCPC*,{dagger}, Richard Brull, MD FRCPC*,{dagger}, Daquan Xu, MB MSc{dagger} and Sherif Abbas, MD{dagger}

* From the Departments of Anesthesia, University of Toronto and
{dagger} Anesthesia & Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Vincent W.S. Chan, Toronto Western Hospital, Department of Anesthesia, 2MC- 405, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada. Phone: 416-603-5118; Fax: 416-603 6494; E-mail: vincent.chan{at}uhn.on.ca

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if real time ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of axillary brachial plexus blockade.

Methods: Patients undergoing elective hand surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Axillary blocks were performed using three motor response endpoints in the nerve stimulator (NS) Group, real-time ultrasound guidance in the ultrasound (US) Group and combined ultrasound and nerve stimulation in the USNS Group. Following administration of a standardized solution containing 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine (total 42 mL), sensory and motor functions were assessed by a blinded observer every five minutes for 30 min. A successful block was defined as complete sensory loss in the median, radial and ulnar nerve distribution by 30 min. The need for local and general anesthesia supplementation and post-block adverse events were documented.

Results: One hundred and eighty-eight patients completed the study. Block success rate was higher in Groups US and USNS (82.8% and 80.7%) than Group NS (62.9%) (P = 0.01 and 0.03 respectively). Fewer patients in Groups US and USNS required supplemental nerve blocks and/or general anesthesia. Postoperatively, axillary bruising and pain were reported more frequently in Group NS.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that ultrasound guidance, with or without concomitant nerve stimulation, significantly improves the success rate of axillary brachial plexus block.


Related articles in CJA:

Ultrasound-guidance and nerve stimulation: implications for the future practice of regional anesthesia/Échoguidage et neurostimulation : implications pour la pratique future de l’anesthésie régionale
Ban Tsui
CJA 2007 54: 165-170. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J. Aguirre, S. Blumenthal, and A. Borgeat
Ultrasound guidance and success rates of axillary brachial plexus block - I
Can J Anesth, July 1, 2007; 54(7): 583 - 583.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
S. Mannion and X. Capdevila
Ultrasound guidance and success rates of axillary brachial plexus block - II
Can J Anesth, July 1, 2007; 54(7): 584 - 584.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
A. Perlas, V. W.S. Chan, and R. Brull
REPLY
Can J Anesth, July 1, 2007; 54(7): 584 - 585.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
B. Tsui
Ultrasound-guidance and nerve stimulation: implications for the future practice of regional anesthesia/Echoguidage et neurostimulation : implications pour la pratique future de l'anesthesie regionale
Can J Anesth, March 1, 2007; 54(3): 165 - 170.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.