CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charbonneau, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, J.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Charbonneau, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, J.-F.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 54:269-275 (2007)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2007

Reports of Original Investigations

Anesthetic technique does not affect the performance of a rabbit model of arterial cyclic flow reductions: a pilot study

[La technique anesthésique n’affecte pas la performance d’un modèle de réductions cycliques de flot chez le lapin : une étude pilote]

Sonia Charbonneau, MD, François Girard, MD FRCPC, Daniel Boudreault, MD FRCPC, Monique Ruel, RN CCRP and Jean-François Hardy, MD FRCPC

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Jean-François Hardy, Department of Anesthesiology, CHUM, Hôpital Notre-Dame, 1560 Sherbrooke East, Montréal, Québec H2L 4M1, Canada. Phone: 514-890-8000, ext. 26876; Fax: 514-412-7653; E-mail: jean-francois.hardy{at}umontreal.ca

Purpose: Pentobarbital anesthesia is, typically, used in an experimental model of cyclic flow reductions (CFR) in rabbits. Our initial observations, using a more complete and effective isoflurane-based anesthetic technique, failed to reproduce findings reported previously. Consequently, we compared the effects of these two anesthetic techniques in the model.

Methods: A modified Folts’ model of carotid artery lesion and stenosis was used. Twelve rabbits completed the experimental protocol: five in the pentobarbital group (P) and seven in the isoflurane group (I). The carotid artery was exposed and flow was reduced by application of a clamp. A standardized injury was performed by cross clamping the artery with a needle forceps and this produced CFR. The number of CFR and the duration of their occurrence were noted. The incidence of thrombosis was compared in each group as well as hemodynamic, hematologic and bleeding time values.

Results: The hematocrit value, platelet count and bleeding time were similar in both groups. The median number and range of CFR [group P: 9 (4–16) ; group I: 9 (5–14)] and the time span of effective CFR formation (group P: 39 ± 17; group I: 38 ± 25 min) were comparable in both groups. The incidence of complete thrombosis of the carotid artery was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: The stability of the model is of short duration, but the occurrence of CFR is not affected by the type of anesthesia. Our findings suggest that the ideal duration of the experimental protocol should be between 30 and 45 min in order to maximize the number of animals still developing CFR.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.