CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carvalho, J. C.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carvalho, J. C.A.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 54:626-633 (2007)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2007

Reports of Original Investigations

Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: optimizing drug delivery regimens

[L’analgésie au rémifentanil contrôlée par le patient pour le travail obstétrical : l’optimisation des régimes d’administration des médicaments]

Mrinalini Balki, MBBS MD*, Shilpa Kasodekar, MBBS MD*, Sudhir Dhumne, MBBS MD*, Paul Bernstein, MD FRCSC{dagger} and Jose C.A. Carvalho, MD PhD FANZCA fRCPC*,{dagger}

* From the Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, and the
{dagger} Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Mrinalini Balki, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Room 781, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada. Phone: 416-586-5270; Fax: 416-586-8664; E-mail: mrinalini.balki{at}uhn.on.ca

Purpose: A pilot study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of two regimens of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with remifentanil for labour analgesia.

Methods: Twenty term parturients requesting labour analgesia were randomized to receive one of two regimens of intravenous remifentanil. The initial settings in both groups consisted of an infusion of 0.025 µg·kg–1·min–1, a PCA bolus of 0.25 µg·kg–1 and a lockout interval of two minutes. In Group A, the infusion was increased in a stepwise manner from 0.025 to 0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 µg·kg–1·min–1 as required; the bolus was kept constant at 0.25 µg·kg–1. In Group B, the bolus was increased from 0.25 to 0.5, 0.75 and 1 µg·kg–1 as necessary; the infusion was kept constant at 0.025 µg·kg–1·min–1. Maternal pain, satisfaction and sedation scores, remifentanil requirement, and side effects were recorded.

Results: Mean pain and patient satisfaction scores, and cumulative doses of remifentanil were similar in the two groups. The overall incidence of side effects was greater in Group B (P = 0.0007), with drowsiness observed in 100% of patients, as compared to 30% in Group A (P = 0.003). The minimum oxygen saturation levels were 94.3% ± 2.6% and 92.2% ± 3.8% in Groups A and B respectively (P = 0.19).

Conclusions: Although pain and satisfaction scores were similar in both groups, the regimen used in Group A was associated with fewer side effects compared to the Group B dosing regimen. This pilot study suggests that remifentanil intravenous PCA is efficacious for labour analgesia as a bolus of 0.25 µg·kg–1, with a lockout interval of two minutes and continuous infusion of 0.025–0.1 µg·kg–1·min–1. The potential for respiratory depression mandates close respiratory monitoring. Large-scale trials to evaluate safety issues are warranted.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.