CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marc, B.
Right arrow Articles by Donati, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marc, B.
Right arrow Articles by Donati, F.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 54:44352 (2007)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2007


Tuesday June 26; 0800 - 1000

44352 - LOCAL ANESTHETIC INFILTRATION REDUCES OPIOID USE AFTER APPENDECTOMY

Belliveau Marc1, Juraj Istvan2 and François Donati3

1 Département d’anesthésiologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
2 Département d’anesthésiologie, Université de Montréal
3 Département d’anesthésiologie, Université de Montréal

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Among the various measures that have been proposed to reduce opioid requirements after appendectomy, one finds: laparoscopic surgery(1), wound infiltration with a local anesthetic (2), use of acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and absence of perforation. The purpose of this study was to examine the importance of each of these factors.

METHODS: After Ethics Committee approval, a 1-yr retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent appendectomy in a teaching hospital. Information was manually retrieved from patients’ charts to obtain standard demographic data, duration of anesthesia, length of hospital stay, surgical approach, wound infiltration, status of appendicitis, opioid and non-opioid analgesics received from admission until surgery and for 24 hr after surgery. Opioid doses were converted to parenteral morphine equivalents. Multiple linear regression was applied to determine if surgical approach, wound infiltration, perforation of the appendix, use of NSAIDs or administration of acetaminophen altered opioid consumption. Statistically significant differences were considered to be present when P < 0.05.

RESULTS: There were 250 cases (150 males and 100 females). Patient age was 29.5 ± 18.6 yr. Mean opioid consumption in the 24 hr following surgery was 13.2 ± 12.9 mg morphine equivalents. Wound infiltration with bupivacaine was associated with a significant decrease in analgesic requirements (Table). Most (90.4%) patients received acetaminophen and this was associated with decreased opioid requirements. No statistically significant decrease in opioid consumption was observed with NSAIDs. With a laparoscopic technique, anesthesia time was longer (93±30 vs 62 ± 21 min; P < 0.001), but opioid requirements were not diminished significantly. Perforation of the appendix (30 % of cases), increased hospital stay (6.4±3.9 vs 2.7±2.3 days), but was not associated with a greater opioid consumption (Table).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table. Influence of five factors on opioid consumption in the first 24 hr after appendectomy.

 
CONCLUSION: Opioid requirements after appendectomy are relatively modest. Wound infiltration with bupivacaine and administration of acetaminophen appear to be effective morphine-sparing measures. Addition of NSAIDs did not seem effective, probably because opioid use was low. A laparoscopic technique takes longer to perform without benefit on opioid requirements or duration of hospital stay.

REFERENCES:

1 FRAZEE R et al. Ann Surg 1994; 219 723

2 ONG CKS et al. Anesth&Analg 2005; 100; 757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.