CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Shahwan, I.
Right arrow Articles by Lamontagne, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Shahwan, I.
Right arrow Articles by Lamontagne, C.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 54:44365 (2007)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2007


Sunday June 24; 1030 - 1230

44365 - ANTICIPATED DIFFICULT INTUBATION

Ibrahim Abu-Shahwan1, Khalid Chowdary2 and Christine Lamontagne3

1 Children Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
2 Children Hospital of Eastern Ontario
3 Children Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Abstract

Introduction: Treacher-Collins syndrome (TCS), also known as mandibulofacial dysostosis, is a rare genetic syndrome. Patients with TCS have maxillary, zygomatic, and mandibular hypoplasia. Endotracheal intubation may be difficult or impossible in patients with TCS or other mandibulofacial deformities, when conventional methods are used. TCS has been associated with difficult tracheal intubation and airway obstruction (1).

The case: A 17-yr old weighting 50-kg patient with TCS was scheduled for adenoidectomy and mandibular osteotomy. Preoperative findings showed the characteristic facial features of TCS, and difficult endotracheal intubation was anticipated. After discussion with patient and parents, awake fiberoptic endotracheal intubation, and retrograde intubation as a second choice option was agreed upon. After sedation with midazolam and fentanyl, lidocaine spray 10% was applied to provide anesthesia of the oral cavity. Bilateral superior laryngeal nerves and recurrent laryngeal nerve blocks were performed using lidocaine 2%. For the adenoidectomy the otolaryngology surgeon preferred an orotracheal intubation for an optimal surgical result and for the mandibular advancement a nasal endotracheal intubation was indicated, as this surgery requires intermaxillary fixation. Awake fiber optic intubation through the oral cavity was successfully performed after the first attempt. Once the surgical removal of the adenoids was completed the proximal end of the tube was sutured to a suction catheter that was inserted through the nasal cavity, the cuff deflated, the tube pushed further into the trachea and pulled back through the nasal cavity. The pilot balloon and inflation valve were cut and pulled back from the nasal cavity using a smaller suction catheter. An intravenous catheter was inserted into the cut end of the tubing leading to the inflatable cuff, and this was connected to a stopcock and a syringe, to reinflate the cuff. After successful completion of both operations, the patient was transferred intubated to the intensive care unit for further monitoring.

Discussion: the anesthesiologist’s first choice when dealing with a patient with difficult airway is awake endotracheal intubation (2). The surgical need for oral followed by nasal intubation in the patient with a difficult airway can pose a unique challenge. Awake fiberoptic intubation followed by retrograde nasal intubation was successful in securing and maintaining the airway in this case. This technique can provide an additional option for the management of the patient with anticipated difficult airway.

References:

1 Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 1806–1812.[Medline]

2 Best Pract Res Clin Anesthesiol 2005; 19: 611–621.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.