CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ree, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, S. K. W.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ree, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, S. K. W.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 55:761-768 (2008)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2008

Case Reports/Case Series

Case series: Anesthesia for retrograde percutaneous aortic valve replacement – experience with the first 40 patients

[Présentation de cas : L’anesthésie pour un remplacement valvulaire aortique percutané rétrograde : notre expérience avec les 40 premiers patients]

Ronald M. Ree, MD FRCPC, John B. Bowering, MD FRCPC and Stephan K. W. Schwarz, MD PHD FRCPC

From the Department of Anesthesia, St. Paul’s Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Stephan Schwarz, Department of Anesthesia, St. Paul’s Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada. Phone: 604-806-8337; Fax: 604-806-8487; E-mail: stephan.schwarz{at}ubc.ca.

Purpose: To describe both the evolution and the main associated complications in the anesthetic management of the initial 40 patients at our centre who underwent percutaneous retrograde aortic valve replacement, a novel technique utilizing a catheter-guided femoral artery approach.

Clinical features: With institutional Research Ethics Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the first 40 patients who underwent percutaneous retrograde aortic valve replacement between January 2005 and March 2006. Information obtained included patient characteristics, anesthetic management, details of the procedure, and complications. All procedures were scheduled to be performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The first four patients received monitored anesthesia care, and the subsequent 36 underwent general anesthesia. There were no anesthesia-related adverse events. The prosthetic valve was placed successfully in 33/40 patients (83%). Median anesthetic time was 3.5 hr (range, 1.25–7.25 hr). Thirty-two/40 patients required vasopressor support. The most common, serious procedural complications were myocardial ischemia and arrhythmia following rapid ventricular pacing, hemorrhage from vascular injury secondary to the placement and removal of the large-bore sheath in the ilio-femoral artery, aortic rupture, and prosthetic valve maldeployment; 30-day mortality was 13% (n = 5/40).

Conclusions: Percutaneous retrograde aortic valve replacement is a novel procedure that presents the anesthesiologist with unique challenges. Careful preoperative assessment, intraoperative monitoring appropriate for a major vascular procedure, and meticulous management of hemodynamics are imperative for a successful outcome. Serious complications, including major hemorrhage from vascular injury as well as arrhythmia and myocardial ischemia following rapid ventricular pacing, must be anticipated and managed in an expeditious fashion.

1 Lester SJ, Heilbron B, Gin K, Dodek, Jue J. The natural history and rate of progression of aortic stenosis. Chest 1998; 113: 1109–14.[Medline]

2 Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC Jr, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease). Circulation 1998; 98: 1949–84.[Free Full Text]

3 Bouma BJ, van Den Brink RB, van Der Meulen JH, et al. To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences. Heart 1999; 82: 143–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4 Bloomstein LZ, Gielchinsky I, Berstein AD, et al. Aortic valve replacement in geriatric patients: determinants of in-hospital mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 597–600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 Otto CM, Mickel MC, Kennedy JW, et al. Three-year outcome after balloon aortic valvuloplasty: insights into prognosis of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1994; 89: 642–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 Lieberman EB, Bashore TM, Hermiller JB, et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in adults: failure of procedure to improve long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 1522–8.[Abstract]

7 Andersen HR, Knudsen LL, Hasenkam JM. Transluminal implantation of artificial heart valves. Description of a new expandable aortic valve and initial results with implantation by catheter technique in closed chest pigs. Eur Heart J 1992; 13: 704–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8 Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 2002; 106: 3006–8.

9 Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C, et al. Early experience with percutaneous transcatheter implantation of heart valve prosthesis for the treatment of end-stage inoperable patients with calcific aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 698–703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10 Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C, et al. Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 1214–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11 Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation 2006; 113: 842–50.

12 Nashef SAM, Roques R, Hammill BG, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997; 91: 667–84.

13 Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, Gauduchean E, Lemeshow SR, Salomon R. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 16: 9–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14 Roques F, Michel P, Goldstone AR, Nashef SA. The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 881–2.[Free Full Text]

15 Webb JG, Pasupati S, Achtem L, Thompson CR. Rapid pacing to facilitate transcatheter prosthetic heart valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68: 199–204.[Medline]

16 Christ M, Sharkova Y, Geldner G, Maisch B. Preoperative and perioperative care for patients with suspected or established aortic stenosis facing noncardiac surgery. Chest 2005; 128: 2944–53.[Medline]

17 Raymer K, Yang H. Patients with aortic stenosis: cardiac complications in non-cardiac surgery. Can J Anesth 1998; 45: 855–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18 De Giovanni JV, Edgar RA, Cranston A. Adenosine induced transient cardiac standstill in catheter interventional procedures for congenital heart disease. Heart 1998; 80: 330–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19 Webb JG, Daly PA. Attempted balloon catheter obstruction of pulmonary arterial flow in ventricular septal rupture. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1990; 19: 246–7.[Medline]

20 Kahn RA, Marin ML, Hollier L, Parsons R, Griepp R. Induction of ventricular fibrillation to facilitate endovascular stent graft repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 534–6.[Medline]

21 Webb JG, Pasupati S, Humphries K, et al. Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 2007; 116: 755–63.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.