CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Splinter, W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Splinter, W.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 55:214-222 (2008)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2008

Reports of Original Investigations

Parents are reluctant to use technological means of communication in pediatric day care

[Les parents résistent à l’idée d’utiliser des moyens technologiques de communications dans les soins pédiatriques de jour]

Kimmo Murto, FRCPC*, Gregory L Bryson, FRCP{square}, Ibrahim Abushahwan, MD*, Jim King, FRCPC§, David Moher, PhD{dagger},§,**, Khaled El-Emam, PhD{ddagger} and William Splinter, FRCPC*

* From the Department of Anesthesiology,
{dagger} Chalmers Research Group,
{ddagger} Research Institute and,
§ Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario,
{square} the Department of Anesthesiology, The Ottawa Hospital, and the
** Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Kimmo Murto, Department of Anesthesiology Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Rd., Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada. Phone: 613-737-2431; Fax: 613-738-4815; E-mail: kmurto{at}cheo.on.ca

Purpose: We hypothesized that advanced information and communication technology (ICT) would be acceptable to parents in a pediatric surgical, and diagnostic imaging day care setting.

Methods: After Ethics Committee approval, we distributed surveys, over a one-month period, to parents of children arriving for day care surgery or diagnostic imaging. Parents indicated their acceptance of various proposed modes of postoperative discussion of healthcare i.e.; face-to-face, videophone, or telephone. Parents were also asked to describe their receptiveness to scheduling non-emergency hospital appointments online and to receiving electronic media describing their child’s surgery and postoperative management. Parental education, income, and familiarity with the Internet were also assessed.

Results: A total of 451 surveys (84% response rate) were returned. Most parents (95%) had access to the Internet and 70% did their banking online. Forty-two percent of the parents had at least a university education and 63% had an annual family income > $50,000 Canadian. The majority of parents (98%) accepted face-to-face interaction, while only 35% and 37% of parents were receptive to videophone and telephone interviews, respectively. Computer availability (P = 0.001) and online banking (P = 0.011) were the only variables that predicted those parents who were in favour of using videophone technology. Parents were receptive to instruction electronic media (80%) and booking appointments online (61%).

Conclusions: A well-educated and technologically sophisticated parent population does not favour advanced communication technologies over simple, face-to-face interaction in an in-hospital setting. These parents are prepared to receive technology-based information about their child’s surgery and to schedule non-emergency hospital appointments online.

1 Prada G, Roberts G, Vail S, et al. Understanding Health-Care Cost Drivers and Escalators: The Conference Board of Canada, Alberta; 2004. Available from URL; www.health.gov.ab.ca/resources/publications/conference_board.pdf (accessed December, 2007).

2 Ellison LM, Pinto PA, Kim F, et al. Telerounding and patient satisfaction after surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 523–30.[Medline]

3 Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, Lewis R. Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD002098.

4 Hersh WR, Helfand M, Wallace J, et al. Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2001, 1: 5.[Medline]

5 Heinzelmann PJ, Williams CM, Lugn NE, Kvedar JC. Clinical outcomes associated with telemedicine/telehealth. Telemed J E Health 2005; 11: 329–47.[Medline]

6 Bensink M, Armfield N, Russell TG, Irving H, Wootton R. Paediatric palliative home care with internet-based video-phones: lessons learnt. J Telemed Telecare 2004; 10(Suppl. 1): 10–3.[Medline]

7 Flewelling C, Ingram CA. Telepediatrics in Canada: an overview. Telemed J E Health 2004; 10: 357–68.[Medline]

8 Wong DT, Kamming D, Salenieks ME, Go K, Kohm C, Chung F. Preadmission anesthesia consultation using telemedicine technology: a pilot study. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 1605–7.[Medline]

9 Dorman T. Telemedicine. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2000; 18: 663–76.[Medline]

10 Jacques PS, France DJ, Pilla M, Lai E, Higgins MS. Evaluation of a hands-free wireless communication device in the perioperative environment. Telemed J E Health 2006; 12: 42–9.[Medline]

11 Cone SW, Gehr L, Hummel R, Merrell RC. Remote anesthetic monitoring using satellite telecommunications and the internet. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 1463–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12 Murto K, Chowdary K, Abushahwan I, et al. A pilot study: videophones in a pediatric day care setting. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: A104 (abstract).[Free Full Text]

13 Miyasaka K, Suzuki Y, Sakai H, Kondo Y. Interactive communication in high-technology home care: videophones for pediatric ventilatory care. Pediatrics 1997; 99: 1–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14 Dillman DA. Chapters 1–4. In: Dillman DA (Ed.). Mail and Internet Surveys. The Tailored Design Method, 2nd Ed. NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2000: 3–193.

15 Litwin MS. Validity. In: Litwin MS (Ed.) The Survey Kit TSK 7. How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity. CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1995: 33–45.

16 Litwin MS. Reliability. In: Litwin MS (Ed.) The Survey Kit TSK 7. How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity. CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1995: 5–31.

17 Dillman DA. Reduction of coverage and sampling errors. In: Dillman DA (Ed.). Mail and Internet Surveys. The Tailored Design Method, 2nd Ed. NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2000: 194–213.

18 Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000; 320: 1517–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19 Rosenfeld BA, Dorman T, Breslow MJ, et al. Intensive care unit telemedicine: alternate paradigm for providing continuous intensivist care. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 3925–31.[Medline]

20 Diamond HS, Goldberg E, Janosky JE. The effect of full-time faculty hospitalists on the efficiency of care at a community teaching hospital. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 197–203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21 Miller EA. The technical and interpersonal aspects of telemedicine: effects on doctor-patient communication. J Telemed Telecare 2003; 9: 1–7.[Medline]

22 Jacobsen SE, Sprenger T, Andersson S, Krogstad JM. Neuropsychological assessment and telemedicine: a preliminary study examining the reliability of neuropsychology services performed via telecommunication. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2003; 9: 472–8.[Medline]

23 Liddell C, Rae G, Brown TR, Johnston D, Coaes V, Mallett J. Giving patients an audiotape of their GP consultation: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2004; 54: 667–72.[Medline]

24 Borowitz SM, Wyatt JC. The origin, content, and workload of e-mail consultations. JAMA 1998; 280: 1321–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25 Dick PT, Filler R, Pavan A. Participant satisfaction and comfort with multidisciplinary pediatric telemedicine consultations. J Ped Surg 1999; 34: 137–42.[Medline]

26 Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Mayes LC, et al. Family-centered preparation for surgery improves perioperative outcomes in children: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 65–74.[Medline]

27 Sim NZ, Kitteringham L, Spitz L, et al. Information on the World Wide Web –how useful is it for parents? J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 305–12.[Medline]

28 Hailey D. The need for cost-effectiveness studies in Murto et al.: telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2005; 11: 379–83.[Medline]

29 Whitten PS, Mair FS, Haycox A, May CR, Williams TL, Hellmich S. Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. BMJ 2002; 324: 1434–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30 Reardon T. Research findings and strategies for assessing telemedicine costs. Telemed J E Health 2005; 11: 348–69.[Medline]

31 Abenstein JP. Technology assessment for the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiol Clin 2006; 24: 677–96.[Medline]

32 Prada G, Grimes K, McCleery A, et al. Challenging Health Care System Sustainability: Understanding Health System Performance of Leading Countries: The Conference Board of Canada; 2004. Available from URL; www.health.gov.ab.ca/resources/publications/conference_board2.pdf (accessed December, 2007).

33 Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Roine R. Study quality and evidence of benefit in recent assessments of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2004; 10: 318–24.[Medline]

34 Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D. Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. CMAJ 2001; 165: 765–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.