CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paquet, C.
Right arrow Articles by Karsli, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paquet, C.
Right arrow Articles by Karsli, C.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 55:471321 (2008)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2008


meeting-abstract

471321 - A TECHNIQUE OF LUNG ISOLATION FOR WHOLE LUNG LAVAGE IN A CHILD WITH PULMONARY ALVEOLAR PROTEINOSIS

Catherine Paquet, MD and Cengiz Karsli, MD, FRCP

Department of Anesthesia, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

Purpose: To report a case in which lung isolation and whole lung lavage was carried out safely in a small child using two cuffed tracheal tubes without the need for post-procedural ventilation.

Clinical Features: Written parental consent was obtained to present this case. A 2.5-year-old, 11 kg male with lysinuric protein intolerance and pulmonary alveolar proteinosis presented for left lung lavage. In order to secure lung isolation, an airway assembly consisting of two cuffed tracheal tubes (3.0 and 3.5 mm ID, Portex, USA) and the angled and Y-connectors from a standard double lumen bronchial tube set (Bronchopart, Rusch, Germany) was prepared (Fig). Following anesthetic induction and muscle relaxation the 3.5 mm ID cuffed tube was inserted in the left main stem bronchus (bronchial tube) and the 3.0 mm ID tube was placed in the trachea (tracheal tube). Proper tube positioning was verified with a 2.2 mm OD flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (Olympus, USA). Lung isolation was also verified clinically by clamping each of the angled connectors while auscultating for breath sounds. A test lavage was performed with 10 cc of normal saline administered via the bronchial tube under bronchoscopic visualization via the tracheal tube to ensure there was no fluid leak. Left lung lavage then proceeded and lavage returns were collected by gravity after each aliquot. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol and remifentanil infusions, titrated to effect. The patient’s trachea was extubated at the end of the procedure and his symptoms improved over the next few days. The patient returned to the operating room two days later to have the same procedure performed on the right lung. A similar anesthetic technique was used and bronchial lavage was completed in the same manner. The patient’s trachea was extubated at the end of the case and his recovery in the post-anesthetic care unit was uneventful.


Figure 1
View larger version (260K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
 
Conclusion: We report the successful and safe use of two cuffed tracheal tubes in a two year old patient in order to perform whole lung lavage.

References:

Thorax 2000 55: 67–77[Free Full Text]

N Eng J Med 2003 349: 2527–39[Free Full Text]

Resp Res 2005 6: 138







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.