CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FOLDES, F. F.
Right arrow Articles by WOLFSON, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by FOLDES, F. F.
Right arrow Articles by WOLFSON, B.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 8, 118-127, Copyright © 1961 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

The Influence of Exercise on the Neuromuscular Activity of Relaxant Drugs

FRANCIS F. FOLDES 1, ALMIRO P. MONTE 1, H. M. BRUNN Jr. 1, and BERNARD WOLFSON 1

1 Department of Anesthesiology, Mercy Hospital, and the Section on Anesthesiology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Penn.

1. The influence of the rate of exercise on the partial neuromuscular block produced by three non-depolarizing (d-Tc, toxiferine, and gallamine) and two depolarizing (CIO and SCh) relaxants was studied in ten healthy, adult, unanaesthetized subjects equally divided between the two sexes.

2. Exercise, which consisted of squeezing the bulb of an ergograph at the rate of six per minute, had no effect on the partial neuromuscular block, as measured by the grip strength, produced by either non-depolarizing or depolarizing relaxants.

3. Similar exercise, but at the rate of 60 per minute, caused a rapid decrease of the grip strength if the partial neuromuscular block was induced by a non-depolarizing agent. No fatigue was observed under similar circumstances if the partial neuromuscular block was induced by a depolarizing relaxant.

4. Possible explanation of the findings presented and their clinical significance have been discussed.

Note:

Read at the Second World Congress of Anaesthesiologists, Toronto, September, 1960.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1961 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.