| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anesthesiology, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Address correspondence to: Dr. David A. Mark, Department of Anesthesiology, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada. Phone: 613-548-7827; Fax: 613-548-1375; E-mail: markd{at}kgh.kari.net
Objectif : Décrire un cas de vomissements en présence du masque laryngé ProSealTM (MLP) in situ. Les nouvelles particularités du MLP et leur rôle dans la protection contre laspiration sont discutés.
Éléments cliniques : Une femme de 27 ans a subi une mammoplastie de réduction bilatérale sous anesthésie générale avec emploi dun MLP pour louverture des voies aériennes. Pendant le transfert à la salle de réveil, elle a eu des vomissements et le MLP était toujours en place. Les vomissement ont été évacués grâce à lorifice de drainage protégeant le pharynx. Il ny a pas eu de signe évident daspiration et la patiente a connu une récupération sans incident.
Conclusion : Ce cas apporte la preuve que le drain du MLP a permis de retirer les vomissements des vois aériennes quand il est bien mis en place. Il peut empêcher laspiration chez un patient anesthésié.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Schmidbauer, S. Bercker, T. Volk, G. Bogusch, G. Mager, and T. Kerner Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-GelTM in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways ClassicTM and ProSealTM using a cadaver model Br. J. Anaesth., November 16, 2008; (2008) aen319v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bercker, W. Schmidbauer, T. Volk, G. Bogusch, H. P. Bubser, M. Hensel, and T. Kerner A Comparison of Seal in Seven Supraglottic Airway Devices Using a Cadaver Model of Elevated Esophageal Pressure Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 445 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hohlrieder, J. Brimacombe, A. von Goedecke, and C. Keller Guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to conventional tracheal intubation by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training. Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 458 - 62, table of contents. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Hickman Prehospital advanced airway management for trauma in the United Kingdom: how, when and by whom? Trauma, July 1, 2006; 8(3): 169 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Goldmann, C. Roettger, and H. Wulf The Size 11/2 ProSealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway in Infants: A Randomized, Crossover Investigation with the ClassicTM Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 405 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Cook, G. Lee, and J. P. Nolan The ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature: [Le masque larynge ProSealTM : un examen des publications] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2005; 52(7): 739 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Goldmann and C. Jakob A Randomized Crossover Comparison of the Size 21/2 Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSealTM Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway-ClassicTM in Pediatric Patients Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2005; 100(6): 1605 - 1610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Goldmann and C. Jakob Size 2 ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2005; 94(3): 385 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C D Deakin, R Peters, P Tomlinson, and M Cassidy Securing the prehospital airway: a comparison of laryngeal mask insertion and endotracheal intubation by UK paramedics Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2005; 22(1): 64 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Hemmerling, P. Beaulieu, K. E. Jacobi, D. Babin, and J. Schmidt Neuromuscular blockade does not change the incidence or severity of pharyngolaryngeal discomfort after LMA anesthesia: [Le blocage neuromusculaire ne modifie pas l'incidence ou la severite de l'inconfort pharyngo-larynge apres l'anesthesie avec un ML] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2004; 51(7): 728 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. Rosenblatt The Use of the LMA-ProSealTM in Airway Resuscitation Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2003; 97(6): 1773 - 1775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Craven, S. R. Laver, T. M. Cook, and J. P. Nolan Use of the Pro-Seal LMA facilitates percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: [L'utilisation du masque larynge Pro-Seal facilite la tracheotomie dilatatrice percutanee] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2003; 50(7): 718 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |