| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anaesthesia, Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Nippon Medical School, 1715 Kamagari, Inba-mura, Inba-gun, Chiba prefecture 270-1694, Japan.
Address Correspondence to: Dr. Tatsusuke Yoshikawa, Phone: 81-476-99-1111; Fax: 81-476-99-1931; E-mail: FZN03121{at}nifty.ne.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical features: LAM is a rare idiopathic disease characterised by progressive deterioration in respiratory function, occurring almost exclusively in women. In establishing the diagnosis, an open lung biopsy (OLB) has been employed in patients with relatively normal lung function. However, TSLB rather than OLB is less invasive. A 38 yr old woman developed a clinical course of cough, shortness of breath and sputum production, Chest Xray findings, 99mTc-MAA scintigraphy and thin-sliced high resolution CT, typical of LAM, TSLB was scheduled to establish the diagnosis. General anesthesia, employing differential lung ventilation and high frequency jet ventilation combined with epidural anesthesia and continuous intravenous propofol was performed successfully. High frequency ventilation was applied to the non-dependent lung and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) to the dependent lung with lower tidal volume and respiratory rate, allowing permissive hypercapnia. In the postoperative period, although synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation was applied, pressure support ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) would have been a better selection. Postoperative sedation was performed satisfactorily using propofol.
Conclusions: We recommend general anesthesia using differential lung ventilation combined with epidural anesthesia and intravenous propofol during TSLB for LAM. Postoperative ventilation should be pressure support ventilation or CPAP to keep peak inspiratory pressure low and allow permissive hypercapnia.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Case report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Routine monitoring included ECG, non-invasive blood pressure and pulse oximetry and an arterial catheter was also inserted. Ten ml mepivacaine 1% were administered via the epidural catheter inserted at T7-8. After confirming analgesia, anesthesia was induced with 100 mg propofol. A double-lumen endo-bronchial tube "Bronchocath® (35Fr, Mallinckrodt Co. Ltd.)" was placed in the left main bronchus, facilitated by 10 mg vecuronium, and then differential lung ventilation (DLV) was started. Five-six millilitres mepivacaine 1% were injected intermittently into the epidural space at intervals of 40 - 50 min. Propofol was administered continuously at a rate of 4 - 6 mgkg1hr1. The lungs were ventilated with a mixture of oxygen and air. The FIO2 was maintained at 0.3 - 0.5. During DLV, the surgically manipulated lung received high frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) at FIO2 of 1.0; 150 cyclesmin1; 30% inspiratory time; 15 psi.pressure, and was sometimes inflated manually. The dependent lung received intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV). To avoid barotrauma of the dependent lung, the PIP was maintained < 20 cm H2O and the tidal volume < 200 ml. The respiratory rate was 14 -16 cyclesmin1, resulting in SpO2 from 97 to 98%, PaO2 110-120 mmHg and hypercapnia (maximal PaCO2 reached 65.3 mmHg). Positive end-expiratory pressure was not employed. TSLB required one hour and 25 min to complete. The cardiovascular system was stable throughout anesthesia. The double-lumen endobronchial tube was replaced by a single-lumen endotracheal tube to perform BAL. The diagnosis was confirmed by both TSLB and BAL3. The patient remained in the ICU for three days postoperatively. Propofol was continuously administered for sedation at 2 3 mgkg1hr1. During sedation in the ICU, circulatory and respiratory functions were strictly monitored. A DIB® catheter (balloon type disposable continuous infusion device; DIB international Co. Ltd.) filled with 48.5 ml bupivacaine 0.25% and 0.3 mg buprenolphine was connected to the epidural catheter for 24 hr for postoperative pain relief. It was refilled at the same concentration for a further 24 hr. For the initial seven hours postoperatively, the patient was ventilated by SIMV with PIP below 20 cm H2O. Then, propofol administration was gradually decreased and the lungs were extubated about 24 hr postoperatively.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is no previous report of TSLB with DLV for the diagnosis of LAM. The anesthetic method we chose had the following benefits: DLV provided both a better surgical field and better ventilation: epidural anesthesia provided analgesia instead of volatile anesthetics. Both epidural anesthesia and intravenous propofol were maintained throughout the perioperative period. Applying this anesthetic technique for LAM, provided the following advantages. The lower PIP and tidal volume reduced regional lung overdistension,4 and allowed permissive hypercapnia.5 The oxygen concentration was reduced to avoid further lung interstitial proliferation. We did not apply high frequency jet ventilation to the dependent lung, because HFJV during IPPV sometimes increases PIP. We did not employ PEEP because high plateau airway pressures were associated with cardiovascular depression6 and propofol decreases left ventricular afterload and myocardial contractility.7 Volatile anesthetics, but not propofol, inhibit hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction,8,9 and propofol inhibits airway smooth muscle contraction.10
In this case, buprenolphine was administered epidurally for postoperative pain relief. The respiratory depressing effect appeared to be negligible as the trachea could be extubated 24 hr postoperatively. Spontaneous breathing might cause further proliferation of the smooth muscle cells around the small airways, while positive pressure ventilation might cause bullas to rupture resulting in pneumothorax. Pressure support ventilation and CPAP with a lower pressure, decrease PIP and the work of breathing to maintain spontaneous ventilation.
We conclude that general anesthesia using differential lung ventilation combined with epidural anesthesia and intravenous propofol is a suitable anesthetic technique for TSLB for lymphangiomyomatosis.
Accepted for publication September 11, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Guinee DG Jr, Feuerstein I, Koss MN, Travis WD. Pulmonary lymphangiomyomatosis. Diagnosis based on results of transbronchial biopsy and immunohistochemical studies and correlation with high-resolution computed tomography findings. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994; 118: 8469.[Medline]
3 Murata A, Takeda Y, Usuki J, et al. A case of pulmonary lymphangiomyomatosis induced by pregnancy. (Japanese). Japanese Journal of Thoracic Diseases 1989; 27: 110611.
4 Hickling KG, Walsh J, Henderson S, Jackson R. Low mortality rate in adult respiratory distress syndrome using low-volume, pressure-limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia: a prospective study. Crit Care Med 1994; 22: 156878.[Medline]
5 Feihl F, Perret C. Permissive hypercapnia. How permissive should we be? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 150: 172237.[Medline]
6
Carvalho CRR, Barbas CSV, Medeiros DM, et al. Temporal hemodynamic effects of permissive hypercapnia associated with ideal PEEP in ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 145866.
7 Hettrick DA, Pagel PS, Warltier DC. Alterations in canine left ventricular-arterial coupling and mechanical efficiency produced by propofol. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 108893.[Medline]
8 Marshall C, Lindgren L, Marshall BE. Effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in rat lungs in vitro. Anesthesiology 1984; 60: 3048.[Medline]
9
Kellow NH, Scott AD, White SA, Feneck RO. Comparison of the effects of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia on right ventricular function and shunt fraction during thoracic surgery. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 57882.
10 Yamakage M, Hirshman CA, Croxton TL. Inhibitory effects of thiopental, ketamine, and propofol on voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in porcine tracheal smooth muscle cells. Anesthesiology. 1995; 83:127482.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |