CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, D. J.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 47:712 (2000)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2000

New Media

Using computer technology to help keep investigators honest

D. John Doyle, MD PHD FRCPC

Toronto, Ontario

The April 2000 issue of Anesthesia and Analgesia contains a very unusual letter to the editor (Anesth Analg 90: 1004–7). A team from Germany scrutinized 47 articles on antiemetic therapy that were published by a Japanese team. The authors of the letter used advanced statistical methods to demonstrate the existence of serious flaws in the Japanese research and conclude that "there must have been an underlying influence causing such incredibly nice data". In essence, the antiemetic data was demonstrated to be untrustworthy.

When I studied biology in university and learned about Mendel's seminal studies on the genetics of peas, the instructor in our class told us that when Mendel's published data was examined many years after his death, biostatisticians found that his data were too good to be true and suspect that he may have ignored some findings did not meet his expectations.

As investigators become more comfortable with statistical methods and as statistical software becomes less expensive and easier to use, this kind of plausibility analysis will become more frequent. Indeed, the ready availability of cheap computing may also help reduce the incidence of plagiarism. With the advent of electronic publishing it will be possible to electronically and automatically scan all electronically published reports for sequences of words that are the same or even similar. Thus, theft of sentences or paragraphs from other reports in submitted or already published manuscripts would be brought to light. Software to do this is already in development for use in detecting plagiarism among university students. In response to the increasing number of companies which sell term papers online, as well as in response to the large amount of material already available freely on the Internet, computer science researchers are developing Internet portals designed to assist university professors in detecting plagiarism. The professor, upon receiving a disk with an essay from a student, submits the file on disk to a special search engine that looks for sequences of words that exist in its database of previously published or previously submitted work. While the computational load associated with such enterprise can be enormous, one need only wait one or two generations of computers (about five years) to expect that such a service will become commonplace.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, D. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS