| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Lainz Hospital and the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute For Economics Of Medicine In Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Vienna, Austria.
Dr. Ashraf Dahaba, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Karl Franzens University, Auenbruggerplatz 29, A-8036, Graz, Austria, Europe. Phone: ++ 43 316 385 2829; Fax: ++ 43 316 385 3267; E-mail: Ashraf.Dahaba{at}kfunigraz.ac.at
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Sixty patients were randomly allocated to receive either 0.2 mgkg-1 (3 x ED95) mivacurium or 0.5 mgkg-1 (1.7 x ED95) rocuronium, under propofol/fentanyl anesthesia. T1, first twitch of the train-of-four (TOF) and TOF ratio (T4:T1) were used to evaluate neuromuscular block using the Relaxometer® mechanomyograph. The trachea was intubated when T1 was maximally suppressed. Neuromuscular block was maintained at 25% T1 with equi-lasting doses of 0.075 mgkg-1 mivacurium or 0.15 mgkg-1 rocuronium.
Results: Mean (min) ± SD mivacurium onset time (1.9 ± 0.4) was longer than that of rocuronium (1.3 ± 0.3). This did not yield a statistical difference in intubating conditions between the two groups. Interval 2575% T1 recovery and time to 0.8 TOF recovery were prolonged following rocuronium (11.9 ± 3.9, 52.6 ± 15.5 respectively) compared to mivacurium (6.7 ± 2.3, 39.2 ± 8.1 respectively). More patients, 22/30, required mivacurium maintenance doses compared to 14/30 patients in the rocuronium group. Arterial blood pressure declined and 13/30 patients manifested erythema following mivacurium administration. The acquisition costs of rocuronium (6.93 Euro/patient) were 23% lower compared to mivacurium (8.96 Euro/patient).
Conclusion: Equi-lasting doses of rocuronium resulted in favourable intubating conditions more rapidly, improved hemodynamic stability, required less frequent administration of maintenance doses and were not associated with erythema, compared to mivacurium.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the questions discussed in this context is the preference of a short-acting vs an intermediate-acting NMBa. While one promises more accurate timing of neuromuscular block, the other guarantees a more constant block and requires less frequent dosing. Two NMBa commonly used for this indication are mivacurium chloride and rocuronium bromide. Mivacurium is a nondepolarizing benzylisoquinolium diester with an intermediate onset and a short duration (ED95 0.067 mgkg-1),1 while rocuronium is a nondepolarizing aminosteroid with a short onset and an intermediate duration (ED95 0.305 mgkg-1).2
The aim of the study was to compare two regimens of equi-lasting doses of mivacurium or rocuronium in patients undergoing scheduled laparoscopic gynecological surgical procedures of short to medium duration. We evaluated these regimens with regard to intubating conditions, efficacy, number of maintenance doses, recovery pattern, hemodynamic alterations, adverse events and costs.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After approval of our local Ethics Committee, all patients who agreed to participate in the study gave written informed consent. We excluded potential participants if they had a history of neuromuscular disease, small joint arthritis, 20% deviation from ideal body weight or were on treatment with drugs thought to interfere with neuromuscular transmission. None of the female participants was pregnant or breast feeding. Sixty consecutive patients aged 1859 yr, ASA Class III, undergoing scheduled elective laparoscopic gynecological surgical procedures expected to last 30 min to two hours were recruited in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either mivacurium or rocuronium according to a computer generated randomization list (MS Excel 7.0 for Windows office 97). An assigned anesthesia nurse, the only one with access to the randomization code, prepared the NMBa initial and maintenance doses from 5-mL (2 mgmL-1) mivacurium or 5-mL (10 mgmL-1) rocuronium ampoules. The anesthesiologist and all other operating room personnel were blinded to the type of NMBa used. Recruitment was four to five patients/week in the period from April 3rd 2001 until June 30th 2001.
Anesthesia protocol and neuromuscular monitoring
Midazolam 7.5 mg po was administered for premedication one hour preoperatively. Anesthesia was induced with 34 µgkg-1 fentanyl and 24 mgkg-1 propofol until the eyelash reflex was obtunded. After intubation (see below), the lungs were ventilated mechanically with 40% oxygen in air. Anesthesia was maintained with 69 mgkg-1hr-1 propofol infusion, and 50100 µg fentanyl supplements. Ventilation was adjusted to maintain an end-tidal CO2 in the range of 3540 mmHg and peripheral oxygen saturation above 95%. Hemodynamic variables were recorded noninvasively every three minutes. Adverse events, including erythema, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were recorded by the anesthesiologist, anesthesia nurses, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) nurses or ward nurses blinded to the type of NMBa used.
Following induction, the right arm was positioned comfortably on an arm board and was restrained from movement by straps. The area above the ulnar nerve at the wrist, where the electrodes were to be placed, was cleaned to ensure adequate contact. The neuromuscular block at the adductor pollicis muscle was evaluated using the Relaxometer® mechanomyograph (Groningen University, Holland).5 The force transducer was attached to the thumb. The ulnar nerve was stimulated supramaximally at the wrist (pulse width 200 µs, square wave) via surface electrodes with train-of-four (TOF) stimuli (2 Hz for two seconds) at 12-sec intervals until a stable control response was achieved (variation of less than ± 2% for the last three minutes). During stabilization, patients were ventilated with oxygen via a face mask. The preload on the thumb was maintained between 200400 g throughout the whole procedure. T1 (first twitch of the TOF) expressed as percentage of control response and the TOF ratio (T4:T1) were used for the evaluation of neuromuscular block. Artefact readings were filtered by discarding all measurements that changed by more than 15% compared to the previous readings. Palmar skin temperature of the thenar area was monitored by the temperature probe of the mechanomyograph. Patients were warmed (Bair HuggerTM Augustine Medical) to keep the temperature of the hand always above 32°C.
After T1 baseline stabilization, initial doses of equi-lasting duration 25% (time from beginning of NMBa administration until 25% T1 recovery) under balanced anesthesia, of either 0.2 mgkg-1 (3 x ED95) mivacurium expected to last for 21.3 min,6 or 0.5 mgkg-1 (1.7 x ED95) rocuronium expected to last for 21.2 min,7 were administered over a period of 30 sec. The trachea was intubated when T1 was suppressed maximally. Intubating conditions were graded as; excellent (no resistance to laryngoscopy, no movement of vocal cords, limbs or coughing), good (slight resistance to laryngoscopy, movement of vocal cords, limbs or diaphragm), poor (active resistance of the patient to laryngoscopy, closing of vocal cords, vigorous movement of the limbs or coughing).8 Neuromuscular block was maintained with equi-lasting doses of 0.075 mgkg-1 mivacurium,1 or 0.15 mgkg-1 rocuronium,9 each time T1 recovered to 25%.
Twenty minutes before the anticipated end of the operation, no further NMBa was administered, and the patients were allowed to recover spontaneously from the neuromuscular block. Recovery from neuromuscular block was not accelerated by cholinesterase inhibiting drugs, based upon reports that reversal of 0.2 mgkg-1 mivacurium neuromuscular blockade in laparoscopic gynecological surgery was associated with a significantly higher incidence of PONV.10,11 At the end of surgery, after 0.8 TOF ratio recovery, anesthesia and neuromuscular recording were terminated. Patients were ventilated with 100% oxygen and were extubated after they maintained adequate respiration (8 breathsmin-1 and PET CO2 <45 mmHg) and were responsive to verbal commands. After patients showed full control of their airway, maintained a head lift for ten seconds, and tightly squeezed the anesthesiologist's hand, they were discharged to the PACU.
Calculations (min)
Costs
The drug acquisition costs were calculated using the commercial price and the number of mivacurium or rocuronium ampoules used for each patient and are presented in Euro (
). The indirect cost was estimated, based upon our hospital's costs of running an operating room for laparoscopic gynecological procedure/hour.
Statistical analysis
We considered the interval 2575%, following 0.2 mgkg-1 mivacurium or 0.5 mgkg-1 rocuronium, as the primary clinical variable upon which a priori power analysis for t test was performed. Based upon previously reported data,6,7 an assumed interval 2575% of nine minutes with a SD of 3.3, revealed that a group size of 30 would be required to detect a three-minute difference between the two groups with >0.9 power.
As our data displayed normal distribution, paired t test was used for the parametric data and Mann-Whitney U test was used for nonparametric data analysis. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the analysis of the hemodynamic variables (group-time interaction). Data were expressed as means ± SD. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Patients in the mivacurium group required 92 ampoules (range 14/patient), while patients in the rocuronium group required 39 ampoules (range 12/patient). The drug acquisition cost in the rocuronium group (6.93
/patient) was less than in the mivacurium group (8.96
/patient). In our hospital the costs of running the operating room for laparoscopic gynecological procedures is approximately 450
/hour. Thus, if the recovery from neuromuscular block is not accelerated by the administration of anticholinesterase drugs, the six-minute prolongation in the recovery time in the rocuronium group would represent an additional, indirect cost of 45
/patient.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intubating conditions
Our results demonstrate that waiting for maximal suppression of twitch response, rather than attempting tracheal intubation at a predetermined time, yields similar intubating conditions though at different onset times following mivacurium or rocuronium administration.
The intubating conditions following rocuronium administration were in accordance with those previously reported using a dose of 0.5 mgkg-1, the same as that used in the present study.7 Three studies used the same dose of 0.2 mgkg-1 mivacurium as we did while attempting tracheal intubation at different time points from NMBa administration. There was no apparent difference in intubating conditions when intubation was attempted at 1.5 min,12 when it was delayed to two minutes,13 or with a further delay to 2.5 min.14
Our findings suggests that waiting for maximal twitch suppression might be a better indicator to achieve optimal intubating conditions.8
Pharmacodynamic variables and maintenance doses
Duration 25% and all other pharmacodynamic variables were prolonged in the rocuronium group compared to the mivacurium group. The different maintenance dose profile between the two groups resulted in a longer recovery time (six minutes) in the rocuronium group compared to the mivacurium group.
Our results are in accordance with the literature following the administration of 0.2 mgkg-1 mivacurium, in which the duration 25% under balanced anesthesia, was 21.3 min (n=7)6 and 19.7 min (n=10).15 However the duration 25% following 0.5 mgkg-1 rocuronium, in our study, was longer than the reported values under balanced anesthesia of 21.2 min (n=11)7 and 22 min (n=7).16 A possible reason for this divergence could be a larger number of patients than those used in the above mentioned descriptive studies was required in our comparative study.
Hemodynamic variables
Two studies demonstrated a decline in mean arterial pressure following rapid administration of 0.2 mgkg-1 mivacurium, either over two to three seconds,17 or 1015 sec.18 However, when mivacurium was administered in more than 30 sec the authors reported no significant decline from baseline.17,18 This is in contrast to our results whereby mivacurium administration in more than 30 sec was still associated with a significant decline in SAP and DAP. This decline lasted only until the tracheal intubation and thus required no intervention.
The hemodynamic stability following the administration of rocuronium in our patients is in accordance with two studies in which increasing doses of 0.6,19 and 0.6, 0.9, 1.2 mgkg-1 rocuronium20 were not associated with significant changes in mean arterial pressure or HR.
Adverse events
No erythema occurred in patients receiving rocuronium. The incidence of erythema experienced by patients receiving mivacurium was relatively high. It was approximately double that reported in a previous study using 0.2 mgkg-1 mivacurium12
Costs
The costs of running an operating room vary between different hospitals. The drug acquisition costs in the rocuronium patients were 23% lower than in the mivacurium patients. However, in our hospital, this could be offset by the higher indirect cost of their delayed recovery if residual neuromuscular block is not reversed.
Worth mentioning is the fact that, to allow our patients to recover spontaneously from neuromuscular block, they were monitored closely to ensure full recovery before extubation. However, using sensitive neuromuscular monitoring or waiting for the patients to recover spontaneously might not always be feasible in the clinical setting, and would thus necessitate reversal of neuromuscular blockade.
In conclusion, for laparoscopic gynecological surgery, equi-lasting doses of the intermediate acting NMBa rocuronium resulted in favourable intubating conditions more rapidly, improved hemodynamic stability, required less frequent administration of maintenance doses and were not associated with erythema, compared to the short-acting NMBa mivacurium. Finally, the acquisition costs of rocuronium were 23% lower but, in the absence of neuromuscular block reversal, recovery time was prolonged compared to mivacurium, representing an additional indirect cost.
Revision received September 12, 2001. Accepted for publication August 10, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Foldes FF, Nagashima H, Nguyen HD, Schiller WS, Mason MM, Ohta Y. The neuromuscular effects of ORG 9426 in patients receiving balanced anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1991; 75: 1916.[Medline]
3 Viby-Mogensen J, Engbaek J, Eriksson I, et al. Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 40: 5974.[Medline]
4 Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 11914.[Medline]
5 Rowaan CJ, Vandenbrom RHG, Wierda JMKH. The relaxometer: a complete and comprehensive computer-controlled neuromuscular transmission measurement system developed for clinical research on muscle relaxants. J Clin Monit 1993; 9: 3844.[Medline]
6
Caldwell JE, Heier T, Kitts JB, Lynam DP, Fahey MR, Miller RD. Comparison of the neuromuscular block induced by mivacurium, suxamethonium or atracurium during nitrous oxide-fentanyl anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63: 3939.
7
Wierda JMKH, De Wit APM, Kuizenga K, Agoston S. Clinical observations on the neuromuscular blocking action of ORG 9426, a new steroidal non-depolarizing agent. Br J Anaesth. 1990; 64: 5213.
8 Agoston S. Onset time and evaluation of intubating conditions: rocuronium in perspective. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1995; 12(Suppl. 11): 317.[Medline]
9 Lambalk LM, De Wit APM, Wierda JMKH, Hennis PJ, Agoston S. Dose-response relationship and time course of action of Org 9426. A new muscle relaxant of intermediate duration evaluated under various anaesthetic techniques. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 90711.[Medline]
10
Ding Y, Fredman B, White PF. Use of mivacurium during laparoscopic surgery: effect of reversal drugs on postoperative recovery. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 4504.
11 Løvstad RZ, Thagaard KS, Berner NS, Raeder JC. Neostigmine 50 µg kg-1 with glycopyrrolate increases postoperative nausea in women after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 495500.[Medline]
12 Tang J, Joshi GP, White PF. Comparison of rocuronium and mivacurium to succinylcholine during outpatient laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 9948.[Abstract]
13
Goldhill DR, Whitehead JP, Emmott RS, Griffith AP, Bracey BJ, Flynn PJ. Neuromuscular and clinical effects of mivacurium chloride in healthy adult patients during nitrous oxide-enflurane anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67: 28995.
14 Maddineni VR, Mirakhur RK, McCoy EP, Fee JPH, Clarke RSJ. Neuromuscular effects and intubating conditions following mivacurium: a comparison with suxamethonium. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 9405.[Medline]
15 Savarese JJ, Ali HH, Basta SJ, et al. The clinical neuromuscular pharmacology of mivacurium chloride (BW B1090U). Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 72332.[Medline]
16
Meistelman C, Plaud B, Donati F. Rocuronium (ORG 9426) neuromuscular blockade at the adductor muscles of the larynx and adductor pollicis in humans. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39: 6659.
17
Choi WW, Mehta MP, Murray DJ, et al. Neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of mivacurium chloride in surgical patients receiving nitrous oxide-narcotic or nitrous oxide-isoflurane anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1989; 36: 64150.
18 Savarese JJ, Ali HH, Basta SJ, et al. The cardiovascular effects of mivacurium chloride (BW B1090U) in patients receiving nitrous oxide-opiate-barbiturate anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 38694.[Medline]
19
McCoy EP, Maddineni VR, Elliott P, Mirakhur RK, Carson IW, Cooper RA. Haemodynamic effects of rocuronium during fentanyl anaesthesia: comparison with vecuronium. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 7038.
20 Levy JH, Davis GK, Duggan J, Szlam F. Determination of the haemodynamics and histamine release of rocuronium (Org 9426) when administered in increased doses under N2O/O2-sufentanil anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 31821.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. El-Orbany and A. A. Dahaba Short-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs allow better control of OR time Can J Anesth, June 1, 2002; 49(6): 635 - 635. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |