CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vallejo, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ramanathan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vallejo, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ramanathan, S.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 48:1122-1126 (2001)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2001

Obstetrical and Pediatric Anesthesia

Chorioamnionitis, not epidural analgesia, is associated with maternal fever during labour

[La chorio-amnionite est associée à la fièvre puerpérale pendant le travail, mais non l'analgésie épidurale]

Manuel C. Vallejo, MD*, Bupesh Kaul, MD*, Lauri J. Adler, MD*, Amy L. Phelps, PhD§, Catherine M. Craven, MD{dagger}, Trevor A. Macpherson, MD{dagger}, Richard L. Sweet, MD{ddagger} and Sivam Ramanathan, MD*

* From the Departments of Anesthesiology,
{dagger} Pathology,
{ddagger} Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, and
§ Quantitative Sciences (School of Business), Duquense University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Dr. Manuel C. Vallejo, Department of Anesthesiology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Phone: 412-641-4260; Fax: 412-641-4766; E-mail: vallejomc{at}anes.upmc.edu


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: Maternal fever is associated with chorioamnionitis and has been linked to labour epidural analgesia (LEA). The purpose of this study was to determine possible associations between LEA and chorioamnionitis, maternal fever, operative delivery rate, and neonatal outcome.

Methods: Data from 14,073 patients were entered into a database over a two-year period. From this database, 62 nulliparous parturients with clinical chorioamnionitis (amnionitis), but without LEA were identified (Group I). Two other groups who received LEA were matched for parity and gestation: Group II – LEA with concomitant amnionitis (n=50) and, Group III – LEA without concomitant amnionitis (n=201). The diagnosis of chorioamnionitis was confirmed by histologic examination. Results are expressed as mean ± SD and analyzed at P <0.05 using ANOVA or Chi-square.

Results: No differences were noted among the groups in the operative delivery rate or Apgar scores at five minutes. The percentage of patients with maternal fever during labour (38.0°C) with amnionitis was significantly less in Group III compared to the other groups (100% in both Groups I and II vs 1.0% in Group III; P=0.000). Likewise, Group III had a lower percentage of neonates with Apgar scores <7 at one minute (35.5% in Group I, 20.0% in Group II, 17.4% in Group III; P=0.010). The percentage of histologic chorioamnionitis was significantly higher in both amnionitis groups compared to Group III (67.7% in Group I, 56.0% in Group II, 4.0% in Group III; P=0.000).

Conclusion: LEA without chorioamnionitis is not associated with maternal fever (38.0°C), increased operative delivery rates or low Apgar scores.


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
SEVERAL studies have documented an association between labour epidural analgesia (LEA) and increased maternal temperature.1–3 Lieberman et al.1 concluded in a retrospective study that LEA is strongly associated with the occurrence of maternal intrapartum fever and an increased neonatal sepsis evaluation rate (NSER), but the issue of chorioamnionitis was not considered in their study. Dashe et al.4 found epidural analgesia is associated with intrapartum fever, but only in the presence of histologic chorioamnionitis. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between LEA, chorioamnionitis, maternal fever (38.0°C), operative delivery rate, and neonatal outcome.


    Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Magee-Womens Hospital (MWH) is a tertiary care maternity facility with more than 7,500 deliveries annually and an 80% labour epidural placement rate. MWH maintains an obstetrical database for the purpose of continuous quality improvement (CQI) pertaining to maternal and neonatal outcome. A dedicated database coder collects information on all patients admitted to the MWH labour and delivery suite and enters this data into a computerized database (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The patient'edical record number (MR#) is set as the key field for the database. Data retrieval was compiled over a two-year period for all patients who where admitted to the MWH labour and delivery suite from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1999. The diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis (amnionitis) was confirmed by matching the MR# in the database and by individual review of the patient's medical chart. The diagnosis of acute histologic chorioamnionitis was confirmed by matching the MR# with the placental pathology report. Approval for this database study was obtained from the MWH Institutional Review Board.

Epidural blocks are inserted at the request of the patient and with approval of the obstetrician. LEA blocks are performed in the sitting position at the L3–L4 to L4–L5 intervertebral space using the loss of resistance to air technique. Bupivacaine 0.25% or ropivacaine 0.2% is used for induction of analgesia to a T10 dermatomal level followed by a continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine or 0.125% ropivacaine with fentanyl (2 µg•mL–1) at 10–12 mL•hr–1.

Diagnostic criteria used at our institution for the diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis (amnionitis) includes fever (38.0°C) plus one or more of the following: maternal tachycardia, fetal tachycardia, uterine tenderness, foul smelling amniotic fluid, or maternal leukocytosis. All patients admitted to the labour suite received an initial vaginal examination to determine cervical dilatation, station, effacement and were subsequently checked at the discretion of the attending obstetrician. Laboratory examination was ordered by the obstetrician as determined by medical history, obstetrical history and current clinical situation. Maternal temperature was measured every four hours or every hour if febrile. Maternal vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate) were measured every hour as per institutional labour and delivery pathway protocol. External fetal heart rate was monitored continuously or by internal fetal scalp electrode if external fetal heart tones could not be monitored continuously.

From the CQI database, 62 nulliparous parturients who did not receive LEA, but had amnionitis at 34.0 ± 7.0 weeks gestation (Group I) were identified. In order to match other nulliparous parturients who did receive LEA, the 95% confidence interval was used to estimate the true mean gestation at 34 ± 2.0 weeks. The matched patients were then divided into two groups: LEA with concomitant amnionitis (Group II) and LEA without concomitant amnionitis (Group III).

Maternal data retrieved from the CQI database included: parity, gestation, age, weight, group B-ß hemolytic streptococcal colonization status (GBBS), preterm (<37 weeks gestation), premature rupture of membranes (PROM), oxytocin augmentation, maternal fever during labour (38.0°C), and mode of delivery (Cesarean section, vaginal delivery, and vacuum/forceps). Maternal temperature was measured orally using a sublingual thermometer (IVAC Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA).

Neonatal outcome data retrieved from the CQI database included; Apgar scores <7 at one minute, and <9 at five minutes, birth weight, and NSER. Indications for neonatal sepsis evaluation at our institution include; maternal fever during labour (38.0C), maternal diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis (amnionitis), prolonged rupture of membranes >24 hr, birth weight <2,500 grams, preterm gestational age <37 weeks gestation, meconium and/or respiratory distress at birth, hypothermia at birth, GBBS colonization, and maternal pre-ecclampsia and/or hypertension.

Statistics describing interval data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical comparison between the three groups was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistics describing nominal data are reported in percentages. Statistical comparison between the three groups' proportions was analyzed using the Chi-square method.5 The P-value for each univariate test are reported. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Data from all 14,073 patients admitted to MWH labour and delivery suite were evaluated retrospectively over a two-year period. From the CQI database, 6,205 parturients (44.1%) were nulliparous of which 62 parturients who did not receive LEA had clinical chorioamnionitis (amnionitis) at 34.0 weeks gestation (Group I, Table IGo). Group II consisted of 50 parturients with LEA, and with concomitant amnionitis. Group III consisted of 201 parturients with LEA, but without concomitant amnionitis (Table IGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I Demographic data, nulliparity, gestation and Group B-ß hemolytic streptococcus status
 
The overall incidence of clinical chorioamnionitis (amnionitis) at our institution during the two-year period was 6.7% (944/14,073) and the incidence of amnionitis in nulliparous parturients was 9.4% (582/6,205).

Demographic data are presented in Table IGo. No differences were noted with respect to gestational age and maternal age and weight. No differences were noted in the GBBS colonization rate or in the percentage of patients with PROM (Table IGo). More patients in both LEA Groups II and III presented preterm (<37 weeks gestation) compared to Group I (Table IGo).

Table IIGo presents maternal labour and delivery outcome data. No differences were noted in the operative delivery rate. The percentage of patients with maternal fever plus one or more criterion used for the diagnosis of amnionitis was significantly less in Group III (Table IIGo). Group III was more likely to receive oxytocin augmentation compared to Group I (Table IIGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II Maternal outcome, oxytocin augmentation, and maternal fever during labour
 
Neonatal outcome data are presented in Table IIIGo. The percentage of neonates with one minute Apgar scores <7 was significantly less in Group III compared to Group I. No differences were noted in the percentage of neonates with Apgar scores <9 at five minutes. Group I had the highest mean birth weight and the lowest percentage of low birth weight (LBW) <2.5 kg neonates. The overall NSER was highest in Group III compared to Groups I and II (Table IIIGo). However, 100% of the neonates in Groups I and II weighing less than 2.5 kg had a neonatal sepsis evaluation compared to only 76% of the neonates in Group III (Table IIIGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE III Neonatal outcome
 
The figureGo shows the percentage of parturients with histologic acute chorioamnionitis in all groups. Group III had the lowest percentage of parturients with histologic acute chorioamnionitis compared to the other two groups.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE Percentage of parturients with histologic acute chorioamnionitis. *P <0.05 compared to Group I, #P <0.05 compared to Group II, for other abbreviations see Table IGo.

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The association between LEA and maternal fever is a subject of much debate as evidenced by the attention this subject has been given in the literature, the lay press and media.1–3,6,7 Our results show LEA without concomitant amnionitis is not associated with elevated maternal fever, increased operative delivery rate or lower Apgar scores. Lieberman et al.1 in a retrospective study of 1,934 nulliparous women found the use of epidural analgesia to be strongly associated with maternal intrapartum fever and an increased NSER, but it is not clear how many of the patients in their study had chorioamnionitis. If Lieberman et al.1 had considered the issue of chorioamnionits, their conclusions on epidural analgesia may have been different.

The incidence of aminionitis in our institution is comparable to that in other tertiary care centers.8 Looff and Hager describe amnionitis as a significant cause of maternal fever in obstetrics.9 Our data concurs with this fact in that all patients in Groups I and II with amnionitis also had fever during labour compared to only 1% in Group III.

Epidural analgesia can elevate maternal temperature, but not enough to cause maternal fever (38.0°C).3,10 This is evidenced by the low incidence of maternal fever in Group III (LEA without concomitant amnionits). The highest rates of maternal fever occurred in both amnionitis groups. Morishima has shown that a greater than 2°C increase in maternal temperature above baseline is associated with decreased uterine blood flow and significant fetal compromise.11 However, small increases in maternal temperature (0.5–1.5°C) that normally occur with LEA, are advantageous to fetal well being in that uterine blood flow is increased, uterine vascular resistance is decreased, fetal blood oxygen tension is increased, with no changes in fetal carbon dioxide tension or pH.10

Our data confirm the results of Dashe et al.4 who found epidural analgesia to be associated with maternal fever, but only in the presence of histologic chorioamnionitis. However, our study is different from Dashe's in that we also looked at both maternal and neonatal outcome. Both amnionitis groups had a significantly higher incidence of histologic chorioamnionitis compared to Group III (FigureGo). Even though amnionitis was not suspected in Group III, the main reason for placental histologic examination was the high incidence of preterm labour.

Negishi et al.12 believe inflammation and/or infection causes hyperthermia, and not epidural analgesia itself, which is consistent with our study and Dashe's results. Negishi found that small concentrations of iv narcotics inhibit the febrile response, while epidural analgesia with or without narcotic does not attenuate this response.12 Hyperthermia during epidural analgesia should not be considered a result of the epidural alone, and potential sources of inflammation/infection (chorioamnionitis) should be aggressively pursued and treated.

Groups II and III had a higher percentage of parturients who presented in preterm labour compared to Group I (Table IGo), and hence a lower mean birth weight and a higher percentage of babies with LBW (Table IIIGo). Raghavan et al. identified both preterm delivery and LBW as major factors associated with neonatal sepsis.13 Groups II and III had a higher NSER due to the higher percentage of prematurity and LBW compared to Group I.

Patients with GBBS colonization are given iv penicillin during labour. Antibiotic coverage explains why the GBBS colonization rate does not make a difference in the febrile response to epidural analgesia and chorioamnionitis in our institution. More parturients in Group III received oxytocin augmentation than Group I. This is explained by the fact that oxytocin augmentation is often used in conjunction with epidural analgesia at our institution.

In conclusion, LEA without concomitant chorioamnionitis is not associated with elevated maternal fever, increased operative delivery rate or lower Apgar scores. On the other hand, chorioamnionitis with, or without concomitant LEA is associated with a higher percentage of maternal fever during labour. Any study comparing the effect of LEA on maternal thermoregulation should consider the issue of chorioamnionitis.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors want to thank David Crowe and Elizabeth DeAngelo for their help with data collection and analysis from the Magee-Womens Hospital Obstetrical database.

Revision received August 29, 2001. Accepted for publication July 18, 2001.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1 Lieberman E, Lang JM, Frigoletto F Jr, Richardson DK, Ringer SA, Cohen A. Epidural analgesia, intrapartum fever, and neonatal sepsis evaluation. Pediatrics 1997; 99: 415–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 Philip J, Alexander JM, Sharma SK, Leveno KJ, McIntire DD, Wiley J. Epidural analgesia during labor and maternal fever. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1271–5.[Medline]

3 Vinson DC, Thomas R, Kiser T. Association between epidural analgesia during labor and fever. J Fam Pract 1993; 36: 617–22.[Medline]

4 Dashe JS, Rogers BB, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Epidural analgesia and intrapartum fever: placental findings. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 341–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 Glantz SA. Primer of Biostatistics, 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1997.

6 Gilbert S. Labor pain relief tied to problems for infants. The New York Times. New York, NY: The New York Times Company, 1997.

7 Viscomi CM, Manullang T. Maternal fever, neonatal sepsis evaluation, and epidural labor analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 549–53.[Medline]

8 Alexander JM, McIntire DM, Leveno KJ. Chorioamnionitis and the prognosis for term infants. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 274–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 Looff JD, Hager WD. Management of chorioamnionitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984; 158: 161–6.[Medline]

10 Camann WR. Epidural analgesia in labor and fetal hyperthermia (Letter). Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 316–7.[Free Full Text]

11 Morishima HO, Glaser B, Niemann WH, James LS. Increased uterine activity and fetal deterioration during maternal hyperthermia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 121: 531–8.[Medline]

12 Negishi C, Lenhardt R, Ozaki M, et al. Opiods inhibit febrile responses in humans, whereas epidural analgesia does not. An explanation for hyperthermia during epidural analgesia. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 218–22.[Medline]

13 Raghavan M, Mondal GP, Bhat VV, Srinivasan S. Perinatal risk factors in neonatal infections. Indian J Pediatr 1992; 59: 335–40.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
Y. Cohen, M. C. Vallejo, B. Kaul, and S. Ramanathan
Epidural analgesia and maternal fever
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2002; 49(7): 760 - 760.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vallejo, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ramanathan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vallejo, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ramanathan, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS