| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, Gunma University, School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Yuji Kadoi, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, Gunma University, School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511 Japan. Phone:81-272-20-7111; Fax: 81-272-20-8473; E-mail: kadoi{at}med.gunma-u.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Nine ASA I or II patients scheduled for ECT were studied. Bilateral ECT was performed after the administration of propofol 1 mgkg1, succinylcholine 1 mgkg1, and assisted mask ventilation with 100% oxygen. Cardiac function was monitored by transthoracic echocardiography, prior to anesthesia induction and throughout the ECT procedure until ten minutes after the seizure.
Results: Increased end-systolic area and decreased fractional area change were observed at one minute after the seizure compared to the awake condition. No regional wall motion abnormalities were observed in all patients both at baseline condition and during the ECT.
Conclusion: Systolic performance of the left ventricle estimated by echocardiography decreased transiently in the immediate period after the electric shock.
ELECTROCONVULSIVE therapy (ECT) is used for treating patients with psychiatric depression.1 However, there have been many reports describing cardiac morbidity associated with ECT.1 The cardiac morbidity of ECT is due to arrhythmias and instability of arterial blood pressure resulting in myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest.1 Therefore, it would be important to assess the cardiac function during ECT.
There are two echocardiographic reports describing the regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) during ECT.23 However, there has been no echocardiographic report describing the time course of cardiac function change during ECT.
Recently, an echocardiographic automated border detection system has been developed, which provides on line, beat-to-beat values of left ventricular cavity area.4 These measurements can then be used to estimate load-dependent parameters of systolic performance such as fractional area change or ejection fraction.
The purpose of this study is to assess the time course of left ventricular systolic performance during ECT, using an echocardiographic automated border detection system.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximeter and ECG were recorded continuously before ECT until the end of the procedure.
After the administration of propofol 1 mgkg1 over ten seconds and loss of consciousness, succinylcholine 1 mgkg1 was administrated, and assisted mask ventilation with 100% oxygen. Within two to three minutes after propofol injection, bilateral ECT was performed.
The transthoracic echocardiograph (Hewlett Packard SONOS 5500®, 3.5 MHz transducer, Andover, MA, USA) used in this study, had automated border detection system (Acoustic Quantification® system), which could trace the endocardial border continuously, compute the cross-section area of the left ventricular cavity, measure the R-R intervals from the corresponding displayed electrocardiographic tracing.4
Left ventricular parasternal short-axis images were recorded at the mid-papillary muscle level for measurements. While viewing the real-time images, the investigator activated automated border detection and adjusted the time gain compensation controls of the ultrasonograph to facilitate the automatic tracking of the highlighted indicator on to the echocardiographic image of the left ventricular endocardial border. Using the track ball of the ultrasonograph, the investigator outlined a region of interest that contained the left ventricular cavity throughout the cardiac cycle, excluding other cardiac chambers. The areas of left ventricle (LV) were then calculated from each cardiac cycle and displayed in a waveform. All studies were performed by the same operator (Y.K.) to eliminate interobserver variability and improve reproducibility. To minimize intraobserver variability, we recorded the acoustic quantification on video tape and re-assessed the validity of the gain setting. As all patients in this study were lean, we could observe LV cavity clearly in all cases.
The following left ventricular indexes were measured for each patient: (1) end-systolic area (ESA), (2) end- diastolic area (EDA), (3) fractional area change (FAC); FAC=(EDA-ESA)/EDA X 100.
According to Mulier et al.,6 we used the quotient of systolic blood pressure and (EDA-ESA) as an index of left ventricular afterload. Data are expressed as means ± SEM.
After confirmation of equal variance among the group by the Bartlett test, changes in the variables were compared with analysis of variance for repeated measures with a P value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Post-hoc testing was performed using Scheffe's test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study we used propofol at a dose of 1 mgkg1 as a hypnotic drug. Fredman et al.5 reported that propofol at a dose of 0.75 mgkg1 improved hemodynamic stability after ECT. In contrast, Mulier et al.6 reported that propofol at a dose of 1.4 mgkg1 reduced systolic arterial blood pressure mainly through its negative inotropic properties. This discrepancy might be attributable to the difference in a propofol dose and in premedical drugs such as beta-adrenoceptor antagonists or atropine.7
The decrease in FAC observed at one minute after the ECT would be derived from two mechanisms. Both administration of propofol at a dose of 1 mgkg1 and increased systolic blood pressure shown in the Figure could induce a decrease in myocardial contractility.
There have been two reports describing RWMA during ECT. Messina et al.2 reported a 45% incidence of new RWMA immediately after ECT. In contrast, O'Connor et al.3 reported that new RWMA were seen in only one of 26 (4%) ECT sessions. They also reported that patients without RWMA at baseline had no new RWMA after ECT. In the present study, we did not examine all segments of the LV because we focussed on systolic performance during ECT. However, we could not detect any RWMA in the section we observed. This partial result is consistent with O'Connor's report. A more extensive study will be necessary to determine whether new RWMA could be observed after ECT.
Although we realize that automated border detection system might underestimate or overestimate EDA and ESA, an echocardiographic automated border detection system is a promising non-invasive assessment of cardiac performance.8 And, many investigators have also observed that accurate, real time measures of left ventricular area dimension can be obtained with echocardiographic automated border detection system.9
In summary, we found that systolic performance of the LV, estimated by echocardiography is decreased transiently in the immediate period after ECT.
Accepted for publication November 17, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2
Messina AG, Paranicas M, Katz B, Markowitz J, Yao F-S, Devereux RB. Effect of electroconvulsive therapy on the electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. Anesth Analg 1992; 75: 5114.
3 O'Connor CJ, Rothenberg DM, Soble JS, et al. The effect of esmolol pretreatment on the incidence of regional wall motion abnormalities during electroconvulsive therapy. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 1437.[Abstract]
4 Bednarz JE, Marcus RH, Lang RM. Technical guidelines for performing automated border detection studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1995; 8: 293305.[Medline]
5
Fredman B, d'Etienne J, Smith I, Husain MM, White PF. Anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy: effects of propofol and methohexital on seizure activity and recovery. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 759.
6
Mulier JP, Wouters PF, Van Aken H, Vermaut G, Vandermeersch E. Cardiodynamic effects of propofol in comparison with thiopental: assessment with a transesophageal echocardiographic approach. Anesth Analg 1991; 72: 2835.
7
Mayur PM, Shree RS, Gangadhar BN, Subbakrishna DK, Janakiramaiah N, Rao GSU. Atropine premedication and the cardiovascular response to electroconvulsive therapy. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 4667.
8 Cahalan MK, Ionescu P, Melton HE, Adler S, Kee LL, Schiller NB. Automated real-time analysis of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 47785.[Medline]
9 Hillel Z, Thys D. Monitoring left ventricular performance. In: Omoto R, Oka Y (Eds). Transesophageal Echocardiography. Tokyo: Shindan-to-Chiryo Co., Ltd, 2000: 5770.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Lynch, A. K. Pandurangi, and J. L. Levenson Electroconvulsive Therapy in a Candidate for Heart Transplant With an Implantable Cardiovertor Defibrillator and Cardiac Contractility Modulator Psychosomatics, July 1, 2008; 49(4): 341 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Saito, F. Nishihara, T. Akihiro, K. Nishikawa, H. Obata, F. Goto, and N. Yuki Landiolol and esmolol prevent tachycardia without altering cerebral blood flow: [Le landiolol et l'esmolol previennent la tachycardie sans alterer le debit sanguin cerebral] Can J Anesth, December 1, 2005; 52(10): 1027 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Ding and P. F. White Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2002; 94(5): 1351 - 1364. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |