CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikawa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Niwa, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mikawa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Niwa, Y.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 48:421-422 (2001)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2001


Correspondence

Effects of pirenzepine, omeprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole on human neutrophil functions

Katsuya Mikawa, MD, Hirohiko Akamatsu, MD, Kahoru Nishina, MD and Yukie Niwa, MD

Kobe, Japan

To the Editor:

Anesthesia and surgery inhibit several neutrophil functions1 involved in antibacterial host defence mechanisms. Pirenzepine (a muscarinic receptor antagonist) and omeprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole (proton pump inhibitors) are administered peri-operatively for prophylaxis against aspiration pneumonitis or stress ulceration.24 Critically ill patients, potentially immunocompromised, often receive these gastric protective agents for the same purpose. This is why, after institutional approvement and informed consent, we assessed chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and superoxide (O2-) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production of neutrophils isolated from 12 healthy adult volunteers in the presence of pirenzepine, omeprazole, lansoprazole, or rabeprazole at clinically relevant concentrations, four times, and ten times these concentrations, according to methods described previously.5 We also measured intracellular calcium ion ([Ca++]i) concentrations and O2- and H2O2 production by the xanthine- xanthine oxidase system. Although pirenzepine, omeprazole, and lansoprazole had no effect on neutrophil chemotaxis, phagocytosis, O2- and H2O2 production, and the stimulant-induced elevation of [Ca++]i, rabeprazole inhibited these functions/responses in a dose-dependent manner (FigureGo). Rabeprazole impaired chemotaxis at clinically relevant concentrations. All drugs failed to scavenge O2- and H2O2 generated by an acellular system. Inhibition of calcium mobilization may have contributed, in part, to reduction of neutrophil function by rabeprazole. Thus, rabeprazole could be beneficial in non-septic patients with systemic inflammation or multiple organ failure. On the other hand, pirenzepine, omeprazole, and lansoprazole may not interfere with neutrophil function in infectious or septic patients. Further in vivo studies are required to assess the clinical effects of these gastric protectors on neutrophil function.



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE Data (mean ± SD) are expressed as percentage of the control (in the absence of the drugs). *P< 0.05 vs control.

 

References

1 Khan FA, Kamal RS, Mithani CH, Khurshid M. Effect of general anaesthesia and surgery on neutrophil function. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 769–75.[Medline]

2 Maekawa N, Nishina K, Mikawa K, Shiga M, Obara H. Comparison of pirenzepine, ranitidine, and pirenzepine-ranitidine combination for reducing preoperative gastric fluid acidity and volume in children. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 53–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 Nishina K, Mikawa K, Maekawa N, Takao Y, Shiga M, Obara H. A comparison of lansoprazole, omeprazole, and ranitidine for reducing preoperative gastric secretion in adult patients undergoing elective surgery. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 832–6.[Abstract]

4 Nishina K, Mikawa K, Takao Y, Shiga M, Maekawa N, Obara H. A comparison of rabeprazole, lansoprazole, and ranitidine for improving gastric fluid property in adults undergoing elective surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 717–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 Nishina K, Akamatsu H, Mikawa K, et al. The inhibitory effects of thiopental, midazolam, and ketamine on human neutrophil functions. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 159–65.[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Timmins, K. Hirota, and T. Kushikata
Preanaesthetic H2 antagonists for acid aspiration pneumonia prophylaxis. Is there evidence of tolerance?
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2003; 91(3): 446 - 447.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikawa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Niwa, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mikawa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Niwa, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS