| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

* From the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and the
Non-Invasive Cardiovascular DiagnosticUnit Institute of Cardiology Medical University of Gdansk Poland.
Address correspondence to:Dr. Magdalena Lasinska-Kowara, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University of Gdansk, ul. Dêbinki 7, 80-952 Gdansk, Poland. Phone: ++ 48 58 349 24 06; Fax: ++ 48 58 346 11 82; E-mail: magda{at}amg.gda.pl Work was carried out at the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care with the cooperation of the Non- invasive Cardiovascular Diagnostic Unit, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical features: A 24-yr-old woman was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a preliminary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) one week after Cesarean section. Neither computerized tomography nor Doppler sonography showed any signs of deep venous thrombosis or PE. In the ICU she required intubation and ventilatory support for acute respiratory and circulatory failure. Bedside echocardiography revealed features of left ventricular failure. A diagnosis of postpartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) was made, appropriate treatment instituted and the patient soon improved.
A 29-yr-old, previously healthy primipara presented at the Maternity Clinic on the fourth postpartum day complaining of increasing dyspnea and fatigue. Within eight hours she required intubation, ventilatory support and subsequent defibrillation due to cardiac arrest. She was transferred to the ICU with a preliminary diagnosis of PE. She developed pulmonary edema followed by cardiac arrest with successful resuscitation. Bedside echocardiography revealed a left ventricular ejection fraction below 30% with an increased systolic diameter of the left ventricle, restrictive diastolic abnormalities and no signs of pulmonary hypertension. Peripartum cardiomyopathy was diagnosed and supportive treatment for heart failure was instituted.
Conclusion: It is possible to misdiagnose postpartum cardiomyopathy for PE. An error in diagnosis is life-threatening for the patient. Echocardiography is a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis. As a noninvasive procedure, it should be performed at the bedside as soon as possible to institute proper treatment and to avoid potentially fatal errors.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Case 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On admission to the ICU the patient was conscious, severely dyspneic and tachypneic. During the next hour she became restless, arterial blood gases showed a pO2 of 6.05 kPa (46 mmHg) and a pCO2 of 3.42 kPa (26 mmHg) and she required intubation and mechanical ventilation.
At this stage echocardiography revealed left ventricular (LV) enlargement with severe systolic dysfunction, an ejection fraction (EF) of 25%, mild mitral regurgitation, a restrictive mitral inflow pattern (deceleration time of E wave 90 msec) and borderline pulmonary hypertension calculated from a small tricuspid jet of regurgitation (Figure 1
AC). PPCM was diagnosed on the basis of echocardiography. The patient received digoxin, captopril, furosemide, aldactone and beta-blockers. Captopril was temporarily changed to nitroprusside and ketanserin to improve peripheral perfusion. Heparin was continued in lowered doses to reduce the possibility of thrombembolic complications. After three consecutive days the patient's gas exchange improved, ventilatory support was stopped and her trachea was extubated. At this moment echocardiography showed a normal diastolic LV diameter with moderate improvement of systolic LV function (EF 45%) and longer deceleration time of E wave (120 msec; Figure 2
AC). On the sixth day after admission the patient was discharged from the ICU to the maternity clinic. TTE performed a week later showed a normal LV diameter with slightly impaired EF (50%) with no signs of mitral regurgitation and normal pulmonary artery pressures.
|
|
| Case 2 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Within five hours from admission she progressed to respiratory insufficiency with a pO2 of 5.76 kPa (43.8 mmHg) and a pCO2 of 2.9 kPa (22.1 mmHg). She was intubated and full ventilatory support was initiated with FIO2 0.5 and PEEP +8 cmH2O. The chest radiograph was suggestive of congestion. She was given digoxin, furosemide and a bolus of iv heparin and seemed to be temporarily stabilized. Before transferring the patient to the ICU, cardiac arrest by ventricular fibrillation occurred. Treatment with defibrillation (x 2), adrenaline 3 mg, atropine 1 mg and lidocaine 100 mg iv restored sinus rhythm.
Soon after admission to the ICU another cardiac arrest occurred and the patient was again resuscitated successfully. Thoracotomy for pulmonary embolectomy was considered as a therapeutic option. The patient was too unstable to be transported for a CT scan. Bedside echocardiography revealed a LV systolic diameter above normal, a severely impaired systolic function with EF 22% and no signs of pulmonary hypertension. Supportive treatment for left ventricular failure (LVF) was started consisting of captopril, digoxin, dopamine as required, furosemide, spironolactone and nitroglycerin.
Weaning from respiratory support was complicated by pulmonary edema due to LVF after the first trial of extubation. Mechanical ventilation was finally discontinued on the fifth day after admission. Four days later, the EF was 45% and the mitral inflow pattern remained abnormal. Echocardiographic examination three weeks later showed almost normal diameters of the left ventricle with an EF of 56%.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although some factors seem to correlate with the disease, e.g., silent myocarditis, autoimmune or idiopathic processes, their contribution to the etiology and pathogenesis of the disease remains hypothetical. An article published recently by Pearson et al. briefly summarises the actual state of knowledge.1
Potential risk factors for this condition are not well defined. Those described (multiparity, multifetal pregnancy, advanced maternal age, pregnancy induced hypertension and tocolytic therapy) are too widely distributed in the maternal population to allow screening. Classically, PPCM has been diagnosed when heart failure occurs within a month before or five months after delivery, without previous evidence of cardiac dysfunction and with no other identifiable cause. It is only recently that echocardiographic findings were incorporated into the diagnostic criteria of PPCM,1 although echocardiography had already been strongly recommended before.810
Establishing an accurate diagnosis of PPCM rapidly is not always easy. First complaints are non-specific and misleading. Increasing fatigue is a feature of late pregnancy and puerperium. Dyspnea is associated with many other common disease states ranging from pneumonia and bronchial asthma to PE.
Uniform opacity of the right lung, treated initially as massive pneumonia in case 1 might also have been a unilateral pulmonary edema. Three similar cases of unilateral pulmonary edema have been described recently as caused by severe mitral regurgitation directed towards right pulmonary vein.11 Echocardiographic findings in our first patient also included mitral regurgitation secondary to dilatation of the left ventricle.
It has already been reported in the literature that PE was diagnosed instead of PPCM.8,12 It is widely stressed that the natural hypercoagulability of pregnancy can predispose to thrombembolic complications.13 As massive PE is the leading cause of maternal death14 it is the most feared diagnosis and other diseases like PPCM are easily forgotten. However, distinguishing between the two is vital for the patient. In both, progression of symptoms is rapid and can lead to death in a short time from the initial presentation. Management of PPCM is quite different from that of PE. Treatment of PPCM is conservative and concentrates on supporting LV function, leaving time for the symptoms to resolve spontaneously. PE requires more aggresive management. High doses of iv heparin remain the treatment of choice for DVT with or without PE. Although they are relatively safe for the fetus (heparin does not cross the placental barrier) the mother is at risk of bleeding complications, especially after delivery. Massive PE can be treated only with urgent surgery and the chances of survival are low.
Sometimes the condition of the patient does not allow for procedures like pulmonary angiography, ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy or spiral CT. Echocardiography has already been described as a useful diagnostic procedure to differentiate between PE and PPCM. Both our cases support this recommendation.
Echocardiographic findings in PE include right ventricular dilatation and a circular shape of the right ventricle in the short axis with paradoxical interventricular septum motion and pulmonary hypertension calculated from tricuspid regurgitation. Sometimes thrombus is visualized by TTE15 and more frequently by transoesophageal echocardiography.16,17
The echocardiographic manifestations of dilated cardiomyopathy are LV dilatation with an end diastolic diameter >2.7 cm/m2, a low EF (<30%) and mitral regurgitation due to mitral annulus dilatation.10 Mild pulmonary hypertension and an abnormal - restrictive - mitral inflow pattern may be found using Doppler method.
Because of its rarity, PPCM is considered late in the differential diagnosis, as happened in both of cases described. Some authors stress the fact that early diagnosis and treatment improves the prognosis of PPCM.9,18
Echocardiography can also provide prognostic information. Patients who deteriorate have higher LV end- diastolic diameters as compared to those who improve.19,20 The response to a dobutamine challenge test assessed echocardiographically is also diminished, even when routine parameters return to baseline.4
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Revision received May 23, 2001. Accepted for publication April 9, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Veille J-C, Zaccaro D. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: summary of an international survey on peripartum cardiomyopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 3159.[Medline]
3 Witlin AG, Mabie WC, Sibai BM. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: an ominous diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 1828.[Medline]
4 Lampert MB, Weinert L, Hibbard J, Korcarz C, Lindheimer M, Lang RM. Contractile reserve in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy and recovered left ventricular function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 18995.[Medline]
5 Brown CS, Bertolet BD. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: a comprehensive review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 40914.[Medline]
6
Yahagi N, Kumon K, Nakatani T, et al. Peripartum cardiomyopathy and tachycardia followed by multiple organ failure. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 5812.
7 Kluger MT, Bersten AD. Multi-organ failure in peripartum cardiomyopathy. Anaesth Intensive Care 1991; 19: 4503.[Medline]
8 Chan L, Hill D. ED echocardiography for peripartum cardiomyopathy. Am J Emerg Med. 1999; 17: 57880.[Medline]
9 Heider AL, Kuller JA, Strauss RA, Wells SR. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: a review of the literature. Obst Gynecol Surv 1999; 54: 52631.
10
Hibbard JU, Lindheimer M, Lang RM. A modified definition for peripartum cardiomyopathy and prognosis based on echocardiography. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 3116.
11 Lesieur O, Lorillard R, Ha Thi H, Dudeffant P, Ledain L. Unilateral pulmonary oedema complicating mitral regurgitation: diagnosis and demonstration by transoesophageal echocardiography. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 46670.[Medline]
12 Aroney C, Khafagi F, Boyle C, Bett N. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: echocardiographic features in five cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 1036.[Medline]
13 Woodhams BJ, Candotti G, Shaw R, Kernoff PB. Changes in coagulation and fibrynolysis during pregnancy: evidence of activation of coagulation preceding spontaneous abortion. Thromb Res 1989; 55: 99107.[Medline]
14
Toglia MR, Weg JG. Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 10814.
15 Dudziak M, Wojtowicz A, Mierzejewski L, Emerich J, Rynkiewicz A. Pulmonary artery thrombus visualized in transthoracic echocardiography in women in the 7th month of pregnancy. Polish Heart Journal 2000; 52: 2467.
16 Torbicki A. Echocardiography in pulmonary embolism. In: Mopurgo M (Ed.). Pulmonary Embolism. Vol. 75 Lung biology in health and disease. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994: 15378.
17 Rosenberg JM, Lefor AT, Kenien G, Marvasti M, Obeid A. Echocardiographic diagnosis and surgical treatment of postpartum pulmonary embolism. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49: 6679.[Abstract]
18 Leonard RB, Schwartz E, Allen DA, Alson RL. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: a case report. J Emerg Med 1992; 10: 15761.[Medline]
19 Ravikishore AG, Kaul UA, Sethi KK, Khalilullah M. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: prognostic variables at initial evaluation. Int J Cardiol 1991; 32: 37780.[Medline]
20 Witlin AG, Mabie WC, Sibai BM. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: a longitudinal echocardiographic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 112932.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B Quinn, B Doyle, and J McInerney Postnatal pre-cordial pain. Pulmonary embolism or peripartum cardiomyopathy Emerg. Med. J., November 1, 2004; 21(6): 746 - 747. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |