| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |


* From the Department of Anesthesiology, Montreal Heart Institute, and the
Departments Of Pharmacy, and
Medicine Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Campus Notre-Dame, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Address correspondence to: Dr. A.Y. Denault, Department of Anesthesiology, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger Street East, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada. Phone: 514-376-3330, ext. 3732; Fax: 514-376-8784; E-mail: denault{at}videotron.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients who received inhaled PGI2 over a one-year period was undertaken. Demographic, hemodynamic, oxygenation status, mode of administration, side effects, duration of hospital stay, and mortality were noted.
Results: Thirty-five patients, of which 33 (92%) were in the intensive care unit, received inhaled PGI2. Of the 27 patients whose pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was monitored, a significant decrease in mean PAP from 34.8 ± 11.8 mmHg to 32.1 ± 11.8 mmHg was observed within one hour after the start of therapy (P=0.0017). Selective pulmonary vasodilatation occurred in 77.8% of the patients. Thirty-three patients had arterial blood gases before and after therapy. There was an improvement in the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in 88% of these with a 175% improvement on average. The ratio of PaO2/FIO2 improved from 108 ± 8 to 138 ± 105 (P=0.001). Six patients (17%) presented hypotension, two had subsequent pneumothorax, one had bronchospasm and in one patient PGI2 inhalation was stopped because of increasing peak pulmonary pressures from the secondary flow coming from the nebulizer. Mortality of the cohort was 54%.
Conclusion: Inhaled PGI2 can be useful in the treatment of patients with PHT and severe hypoxia. It can however be associated with systemic side effects.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(6-ketoPGF1
)2 and has a half-life of two to three minutes. Over the years, it has been used for many indications including long-term management of PHT. When given systemically, its use is limited by adverse effects including systemic hypotension and worsening of intrapulmonary shunt.3 Administration by inhalation has been used to improve its pulmonary selectivity. Hence, it reduces pulmonary hypertension (PHT) and improves oxygenation by matching perfusion and ventilation of lung units.4 With approval of our Research and Ethics Committee, we present our one-year experience with nebulized PGI2, including its utilization in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the operating room (OR).
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PGI2 (Flolan, Glaxo Wellcome Inc, Mississauga, ON, Canada) was given as epoprostenol salt 1.5 mg dissolved in 100 mL of sterile glycine buffer diluent for a concentration of 15 µgmL1. The drug is administered through a conventional in-line nebulizer kit (Ref 8901, Salter Labs, Arvin, CA, USA) with an oxygen flow of 6 Lmin1 connected to the inspiratory limb of the ventilator. For continuous administration, the bag containing the drug is attached to an ice pack and delivered directly in the nebulizer through a volumetric pump.
Statistical analysis
Paired Student's t tests were used to evaluate changes in hemodynamic and oxygenation variables. To determine independent predictors of death, we used unpaired Student' t tests to compare means and chi-square tests for proportions. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Thirty-three patients (94.3%) had ABG analyzed before and after inhaled PGI2 administration. The ratio of PaO2/FIO2 improved from 108 ± 81 to 138 ± 105 (P=0.001) initially and to 224 ± 134 (P 0.0001) after best improvement. In total, 87.9% of these patients improved their PaO2/FIO2 ratio with a 174.7% improvement on average observed in responders. Two patients did not have ABG either before or after treatment. One was a patient treated in the OR who had a SaO2 of 100% before and after treatment with a FIO2 of 50% and the other was treated in the ICU and improved his SaO2 from 95 to 100% with a FIO2 of 70%.
Six patients (17%) presented hypotension, two had subsequent pneumothoraces, one had bronchospasm and in one patient PGI2 inhalation was stopped because of increasing peak pulmonary pressures from the secondary flow coming from the nebulizer. Nineteen patients died. On average, the patients who died were older than those who survived (49.35 ± 19.2 yr vs 63.2 ± 10.7 yr, P=0.02).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostacyclin is known to be a powerful vasodilator through an increase in intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). When given systemically, it can have adverse effects such as hypotension and worsening of intrapulmonary shunt. Recently, it has been given by inhalation after nebulization both in animals and humans and this has been shown to increase pulmonary selectivity. PGI2 is not inactivated in the lung like other prostaglandins but is spontaneously hydrolyzed at physiologic pH to an inactive metabolite, 6-ketoPGF1
. Therefore, when given by inhalation, it tends to be absorbed locally in ventilated areas and is inactivated by the time it reaches the systemic circulation in significant amounts. Many animal models713 of hypoxemia and PHT and human studies have confirmed that inhaled PGI2 can improve oxygenation and decrease PHT in many subjects including those suffering from ARDS and PHT of various causes.
Case series are predominant in the literature on PGI2. Pappert et al.14 suggested that side effects and toxicity should be studied more extensively. One of our patients had bronchospasm on two occasions after receiving inhaled prostacyclin. She had a history of CREST syndrome, PHT secondary to lung fibrosis, coronary artery disease, hypertension and diabetes but was not a known asthmatic. A study by Hardy et al.15 demonstrated that PGI2 could exhibit both bronchoconstrictor and antibronchoconstrictor properties when inhaled. They demonstrated that, in asthmatics, inhaled PGI2 can prevent metacholine or PGD2 induced bronchospasm. On the other hand, small airway resistance as measured by forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and maximum expiratory flow at 30% vital capacity (Vmax30) was increased while larger airway resistance, measured by specific airway conductance remained unchanged. They hypothesized that pulmonary vasodilation could enhance the clearance of inhaled bronchoconstrictors while causing engorgement of small airways, thereby increasing resistance. On the other hand, Burghuber did not observe any changes in pulmonary function tests in normal volunteers receiving inhaled PGI2.16
Six patients had hypotension after treatment with inhaled PGI2. It is noteworthy that these patients were suffering from hypotension before the start of therapy. There was a patient with postmyocardial infarction persisting ventricular septal defect who had an intra-aortic balloon pump, a postoperative cardiac surgical patient on vasoactive support, a patient who had dilated cardiomyopathy and suspected septic shock and two patients with septic shock. Hypotension has rarely been encountered after inhaled PGI2 as opposed to iv PGI2 treatment.17 It is possible that ventricular dysfunction in these patients was associated with an improvement in cardiac output through a reduction in afterload, which has been reported with PGI2. Such a reduction in afterload could be associated with a fall in blood pressure but not in cardiac output. This is what we observed in one patient who had hypotension while receiving direct intratracheal boluses. The hypotension was associated with a 25% increase in cardiac index. It is also possible that with direct intratracheal administration or with relatively large nebulized doses that systemic absorption occurred because PGI2 is not inactivated by pulmonary epithelium. This "spillover" into the systemic circulation has been described.18
Inhaled NO has received a fair amount of interest in the last few years as a treatment of ARDS and PHT because of its ability to provoke selective pulmonary vasodilation.19 Its effect remains localized because it is inactivated by hemoglobin as soon as it reaches the circulation. It may, however, have toxic metabolites and can cause methemoglobinemia, especially when given at high concentrations for a long period of time and necessitates specialized and costly equipment to administer. Prostacyclin, on the other hand, has no known toxic metabolites and very few side effects. It can be administered easily by simple nebulization with minimal extra equipment, which is interesting for utilization in the OR. A full 24-hr of treatment, is estimated to cost $115.00 CDN. Several studies have compared NO and PGI2. Some authors have observed a better reduction in PAP with inhaled PGI217,20,21 while some show no significant difference between the two agents.18,22 Improvement in oxygenation sometimes appears to be better with NO,20 or with inhaled PGI2.23 Others showed no differences between the two agents.22 It should be noted that in all these studies, the administration of inhaled PGI2 was not controlled or randomized and that the doses used are not necessarily equipotent to NO.
Our study has several limitations. First, it is a retrospective study. Second, patients had very different pathologies bringing about the use of inhaled prostacyclin. This may explain why some responded sooner than others and why others required escalating doses of prostacyclin, becoming somewhat resistant to the drug. Some authors have reported inhaled PGI2 to be associated with in vitro hemostatic disturbances16,23 but this remains controversial. We did not explore this aspect. In addition, we could not determine the aerosol fraction that was deposited in the lung. This has been estimated to be less than 5% in mechanically ventilated patients.24,25
In summary, inhaled prostacyclin is a useful and affordable addition to anesthesiologists and intensivists in the treatment of PHT and hypoxia of various origins. Systemic absorption can occur despite administration by the inhaled route. Further studies are required to determine dose-responsiveness, optimal condition of utilization and impact on survival.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Revision received July 11, 2001. Accepted for publication May 18, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Kerins DM, Murray R, FitzGerald GA. Prostacyclin and prostaglandin E1: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic utility. Prog Hemost Thromb 1991; 10: 30737.[Medline]
3
Olschewski H, Ghofrani HA, Walmrath D, et al. Inhaled prostacyclin and iloprost in severe pulmonary hypertension secondary to lung fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160: 6007.
4 Walmrath D, Schneider T, Pilch J, Grimminger F, Seeger W. Aerosolised prostacyclin in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet 1993; 342: 9612.[Medline]
5 Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, et al. Report of the American-European Consensus conference on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Consensus Committee. J Crit Care 1994; 9: 7281.[Medline]
6 Domenighetti G, Stricker H, Waldispuehl B. Nebulized prostacyclin (PGI2) in acute respiratory distress syndrome: impact of primary (pulmonary injury) and secondary (extrapulmonary injury) disease on gas exchange response. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 5762.[Medline]
7 Walmrath D, Schermuly R, Pilch J, Grimminger F, Seeger W. Effects of inhaled versus intravenous vasodilators in experimental pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 108492.[Abstract]
8 Welte M, Zwissler B, Habazettl H, Messmer K. PGI2 aerosol versus nitric oxide for selective pulmonary vasodilation in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Eur Surg Res 1993; 25: 32940.[Medline]
9 Zobel G, Dacar D, Rodl S, Friehs I. Inhaled nitric oxide versus inhaled prostacyclin and intravenous versus inhaled prostacyclin in acute respiratory failure with pulmonary hypertension in piglets. Pediatr Res 1995; 38: 198204.[Medline]
10 Zwissler B, Welte M, Messmer K. Effects of inhaled prostacyclin as compared with inhaled nitric oxide on right ventricular performance in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1995; 9: 2839.[Medline]
11 Booke M, Bradford DW, Hinder F, et al. Effects of inhaled nitric oxide and nebulized prostacyclin on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in anesthetized sheep. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 18418.[Medline]
12 Kleen M, Habler O, Hofstetter C, et al. Efficacy of inhaled prostanoids in experimental pulmonary hypertension. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 11039.[Medline]
13
Hill LL, Pearl RG. Combined inhaled nitric oxide and inhaled prostacyclin during experimental chronic pulmonary hypertension. J Appl Physiol 1999; 86: 11604.
14 Pappert D, Busch T, Gerlach H, Lewandowski K, Radermacher P, Rossaint R. Aerosolized prostacyclin versus inhaled nitric oxide in children with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 150711.[Medline]
15
Hardy CC, Bradding P, Robinson C, Holgate ST. Bronchoconstrictor and antibronchoconstrictor properties of inhaled prostacyclin in asthma. J Appl Physiol 1988; 64: 156774.
16 Burghuber OC, Silberbauer K, Haber P, Sinzinger H, Elliott M, Leithner C. Pulmonary and antiaggregatory effects of prostacyclin after inhalation and intravenous infusion. Respiration 1984; 45: 4504.[Medline]
17
Olschewski H, Walmrath D, Schermuly R, Ghofrani A, Grimminger F, Seeger W. Aerosolized prostacyclin and iloprost in severe pulmonary hypertension. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124: 8204.
18 Walmrath D, Schneider T, Pilch J, Schermuly R, Grimminger F, Seeger W. Effects of aerosolized prostacyclin in severe pneumonia. Impact of fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151: 72430.[Abstract]
19
Troncy E, Francoeur M, Blaise G. Inhaled nitric oxide: clinical applications, indications, and toxicology. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44: 97388.
20 Zwissler B, Kemming G, Habler O, et al. Inhaled prostacyclin (PGI2) versus inhaled nitric oxide in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154: 16717.[Abstract]
21
Mikhail G, Gibbs J, Richardson M, et al. An evaluation of nebulized prostacyclin in patients with primary and secondary pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 1499504.
22
Haraldsson A, Kieler-Jensen N, Nathorst-Westfelt U, Bergh CH, Ricksten SE. Comparison of inhaled nitric oxide and inhaled aerosolized prostacyclin in the evaluation of heart transplant candidates with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. Chest 1998; 114: 7806.
23 van Heerden PV, Gibbs NM, Michalopoulos N. Effect of low concentrations of prostacyclin on platelet function in vitro. Anaesth Intensive Care 1997; 25: 3436.[Medline]
24 Thomas SH, O'Doherty MJ, Fidler HM, Page CJ, Treacher DF, Nunan TO. Pulmonary deposition of a nebulised aerosol during mechanical ventilation. Thorax 1993; 48: 1549.[Abstract]
25 MacIntyre NR, Silver RM, Miller CW, Schuler F, Coleman RE. Aerosol delivery in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 814.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Subramaniam and J.-P. Yared Management of Pulmonary Hypertension in the Operating Room Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2007; 11(2): 119 - 136. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fortier, R.G. DeMaria, Y. Lamarche, O. Malo, A. Denault, F. Desjardins, M. Carrier, and L.P. Perrault Inhaled prostacyclin reduces cardiopulmonary bypass-induced pulmonary endothelial dysfunction via increased cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2004; 128(1): 109 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Dias-Junior, A. Martineau, P. Couture, and A. Denault Pharmacologic Therapy of Acute Pulmonary Embolism * Response Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 266 - 267. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Martineau, G. Arcand, P. Couture, D. Babin, L. P. Perreault, and A. Denault Transesophageal Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Carbon Dioxide Embolism During Minimally Invasive Saphenous Vein Harvesting and Treatment with Inhaled Epoprostenol Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2003; 96(4): 962 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hache, A. Denault, S. Belisle, D. Robitaille, P. Couture, P. Sheridan, M. Pellerin, D. Babin, N. Noel, M.-C. Guertin, et al. Inhaled epoprostenol (prostacyclin) and pulmonary hypertension before cardiac surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2003; 125(3): 642 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Theodoraki, P. Rellia, A. Thanopoulos, L. Tsourelis, D. Zarkalis, P. Sfyrakis, and T. Antoniou Inhaled iloprost controls pulmonary hypertension after cardiopulmonary bypass: [L'inhalation d'iloprost permet de controler l'hypertension pulmonaire apres la circulation extracorporelle] Can J Anesth, November 1, 2002; 49(9): 963 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |