CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maltby, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fick, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Maltby, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fick, G. H.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 48:A58 (2001)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2001


Abstracts - Tuesday June 12 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m.

GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPY: LARYNGEAL MASK VS. TRACHEAL TUBE

J. Roger Maltby, MB, Michael T. Beriault, MD, Neil C. Watson, MB, David Liepert, MD and Gordon H. Fick, PhD*

Department of Anesthesia, Foothills Medical Centre
* Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta

INTRODUCTION

The LMA-Classic is used for gynecological laparoscopy in non-obese patients.1,2 The ProSeal LMA3 incorporates a posterior inflatable cuff that permits higher airway pressure without oropharyngeal leak. We compared the LMA-Classic (BMI <=30 kg.m-2) or ProSeal LMA (BMI >30 kg.m-2) with endotracheal tube (ETT) for elective gynecologic laparoscopy.

METHODS

Patients aged >=18 yr, ASA I - III were randomized to LMA or ETT. Following preoxygenation, anesthesia was induced using propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium. A size 4 LMA (Classic or ProSeal) or ETT 7.0 mm was inserted. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane and nitrous oxide in 30-50% oxygen, VT 10 mL.kg-1 and rate 10.min-1. Ventilation parameters were recorded before peritoneal insufflation (baseline) and with head down tilt during peritoneal insufflation (insufflation). The surgeon, blinded to the type of airway, assessed gastric size laparoscopically on a 0-10 scale at insertion of the laparoscope and at the end of the procedure.

RESULTS

Demographic data, anesthetic time, insufflation time, and changes in gastric distension were similar in both groups. Ventilation measurements are shown in the TableGo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE Ventilation parameters
 
DISCUSSION

The LMA-Classic in non-obese patients and the ProSeal LMA in obese patients permitted effective ventilation during gynecological laparoscopy. Changes in gastric distension scores were not clinically significant and no surgeon requested passage of a gastric tube to deflate the stomach.

REFERENCES

1 Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 129–33.[Abstract]

2 Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 139–43.[Abstract]

3 Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 42–8.[Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maltby, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fick, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Maltby, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fick, G. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS