| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Jean Wong, Department of Anesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada. Phone: 416-603-5118; Fax: 416-603-6494;jean_wong{at}yahoo.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Sixty-eight patients over the age of 60 were randomized into one of two groups. In the standard practice (SP) group, the anesthesiologists were blinded to the BIS value, and isoflurane was titrated according to standard clinical practice. In the BIS group, isoflurane was titrated to maintain a BIS value between 5060.
Results: The total isoflurane usage was 30% lower in the BIS group compared to the SP group (5.6 ± 3 vs 7.7 ± 3 mL, P <0.05). The time to orientation was faster in the BIS group compared to the SP group (9.5 ± 3 vs 13.1 ± 4 min, P <0.001). There were no differences in the postoperative psychometric tests between the two groups.
Conclusions: There was no difference in the level of postoperative cognitive dysfunction between the two groups. However, titration of isoflurane using the BIS index decreased utilization of isoflurane and contributed to faster emergence of elderly patients undergoing elective knee or hip replacement surgery.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction may contribute to increased perioperative morbidity.6 Therefore, it is important to minimize the risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
The bispectral index (BIS) is a continuous processed electroencephalography parameter that has been developed to measure the hypnotic effects of anesthetic and sedative agents on the brain.7 Previous studies have shown that BIS guided titration of the hypnotic agents propofol, desflurane, and sevoflurane led to faster recovery profiles.8,9 The elderly orthopedic patient population may be at higher risk for delayed recovery and postoperative cognitive dysfunction, thus this group of patients may benefit from BIS monitoring.
This study was designed to investigate whether BIS monitoring improves clinical anesthetic delivery, recovery profiles, and decreases the level of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing total knee or hip replacement surgery with general anesthesia compared to standard clinical practice.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Exclusion criteria were significant cardiorespiratory or other end-organ disease, depression or psychiatric disorders, dementia, previous cerebrovascular accident, head trauma, inadequate command of English, and drug or alcohol abuse. Patients were excluded if they scored <24 on the preoperative baseline Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) performed upon arrival in the same day admission unit.
Patients were randomized to receive general anesthesia with either BIS guided titration of anesthesia or standard clinical practice. A block randomization with concealed varying block sizes was performed with computer generated random numbers.
Preoperatively, a research assistant interviewed the patients and conducted psychometric tests including the MMSE,1012 Trieger dot test13 and digit symbol substitution test (DSST). No premedication was given.
Routine monitoring included a 5-lead electrocardiogram, pulse oximeter, and non-invasive blood pressure cuff. All patients had BIS sensors (Aspect Medical Systems Inc., Newton, MA, USA) applied to the forehead and temple by a research assistant. The BIS values were displayed and recorded by an Aspect EEG monitor (model A-1050, Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA, USA). An iv infusion of normal saline was established in the patient's upper extremity. The BIS value was recorded continuously prior to induction until after the patient was awake and responding to verbal commands.
In both groups, general anesthesia was induced with propofol 12 mgkg1 iv, fentanyl 23 µgkg1 iv, midazolam 1 mg iv and endotracheal intubation was performed after administration of rocuronium 0.6 mgkg1 iv.
All of the four anesthesiologists participating in this study had greater than five years of experience providing anesthetic patient care. In the standard practice (SP) group, the anesthesiologist was blinded to the BIS value by turning the BIS monitor away from the anesthesiologist's view. The administration of isoflurane and fentanyl were adjusted according to standard clinical practice and to provide a rapid recovery.
In the BIS group, the anesthesiologist adjusted the administration of isoflurane and fentanyl to maintain a BIS index of 5060.
In both groups, patients were ventilated and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane and 6070% nitrous oxide in oxygen at 3 Lmin1 for the first five minutes, then the gas flow was decreased to 1.5 Lmin1. Intermittent bolus doses of iv rocuronium (0.20.3 mgkg1) were administered as needed.
In the SP group, if the patient exhibited hypertension (mean arterial pressure >25% above baseline), and tachycardia (heart rate >90 beatsmin1), the attending anesthesiologist had the options of increasing the inspired isoflurane concentration or administering fentanyl 2550 µg iv or labetolol 510 mg iv. The mode of treatment was at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist.
In the BIS titrated group, if the patient exhibited hypertension, or tachycardia, the mode of treatment was dependent on the BIS index. If the BIS index was >60, anesthesia was deepened by increasing the inspired isoflurane concentration until the BIS index was between 5060. If the BIS index was already in the targeted range, and the patient exhibited hypertension or tachycardia, fentanyl 2550 µg iv was administered. If the BIS index was <50, isoflurane was decreased and fentanyl 2550 µg iv was administered for hypertension or tachycardia if the patient showed signs of inadequate analgesia (i.e., lacrimation, grimacing, movement, etc.) or labetolol 510 mg iv was administered if the patient did not show signs of inadequate analgesia.
In both groups, 15 min prior to the end of surgery, fentanyl 0.51.0 µgkg1 iv was administered. In the SP group, ten minutes prior to the end of surgery, the inspired concentration of isoflurane was decreased according to usual clinical practice. In the BIS group, ten minutes prior to the end of surgery, the isoflurane concentration was adjusted to maintain a BIS of 6070. Reversal of neuromuscular blockade was achieved with neostigmine (0.05 mgkg1) and glycopyrrolate (0.01 mgkg1) five minutes prior to the discontinuation of inhalational agents. In both groups the isoflurane and nitrous oxide were discontinued at the end of surgery.
The usage (mL) of isoflurane was calculated using the formula described by Dion (usage of volatile anesthetic (mL)=dialed concentration x total fresh gas flow x duration at that concentration x molecular weight divided by 2412 x density.14
The times to awakening (eye opening to verbal command), extubation, and time to readiness for transfer to postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was determined at one-minute intervals from discontinuation of the isoflurane.
The time to orientation to person, place and time was determined by assessing the patient at one-minute intervals in PACU. The Aldrete score was assessed at 15-min intervals by a research assistant blinded to group assignment, to determine readiness for discharge from PACU (i.e., Aldrete score >9).15 The MMSE, DSST, and Trieger dot test were conducted at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after arrival in PACU, and at 24, 48, and 72 hr postoperatively. Symptoms of clinical cognitive dysfunction (i.e., reduced ability to maintain attention to external stimuli, disorganized thinking, disorientation, memory impairment, etc.)16 reported from nurses, family members, research assistant, or patient (all blinded to group assignment) were recorded. The patients received patient controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine postoperatively. At the 72-hr interview, the patients were asked a series of questions relating to whether they had any recall of intraoperative events (Appendix). The date of discharge from hospital and reasons for delay in discharge were recorded. The patients were interviewed by telephone at 14 days after surgery to assess whether they had any recall of intraoperative events and sleep disturbances.
Parametric data were analyzed using t tests for comparison between groups. The emergence and recovery times between the two groups were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using the Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) statistic. Nonparametric variables including the scores in the MMSE, DSST, and Trieger dot test between the two groups were analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test or Chi square test with Yates' correction, as appropriate. A difference in drug requirements between the two groups was tested by unpaired t test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Data are expressed as mean values ± SD or numbers (n).
A power analysis (
=0.05, ß=80%) was performed prior to the initiation of the study. This analysis suggested that 28 patients in each group would be adequate to detect a 20% reduction in the times from discontinuation of anesthetics to orientation [assumption of 13 ± 3.4 min (mean ± standard deviation) in the SP group based on a pilot study].
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the absence of a gold standard for measuring the effects of anesthetics on the brain, autonomic activity such as changes in blood pressure and heart rate have been used to titrate anesthetic agents. However, this has been shown to have poor correlation with anesthetic depth.18 As well, the high prevalence of cardiovascular disease and subsequent drug use in elderly patients may inhibit typical hemodynamic responses to surgical stimulation.
The minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane and other volatile anesthetic gases decreases with increased age.1921 Monitoring of the hypnotic effect of volatile anesthetics may help optimize the appropriate use of hypnotics, analgesics, and vasoactive drugs. A recent study examining the effect of increased age on the BIS index showed that increased age did not change the BIS index associated with clinical endpoints for sedation. As well, the BIS index was a better predictor of depth of sedation than end-tidal sevoflurane concentration.21 Another study found that increased age had no effect on the rate of BIS reduction with increasing propofol concentration.22
In our study, the faster time to orientation in the BIS vs standard practice group is consistent with other studies. In a study of ambulatory gynecological surgical patients, the times to orientation were faster in the BIS-titrated group vs the control group receiving desflurane 8.4 ± 2.4 vs 10.5 ± 4.2 min, and sevoflurane 13.2 ± 4.0 vs 10.2 ± 2.8 min respectively.9 The times to reach the recovery endpoints of eye opening (6.3 vs 9.5 min) and responding to command (6.7 vs 10.5 min) were also faster in the BIS vs standard practice group of patients receiving propofol, alfentanil and nitrous oxide.8 In our study, the time to achieve an Aldrete score >9 was faster in the BIS than the SP group. The trend toward faster times to discharge from PACU of patients in the BIS group may have been significant if our sample size had been larger.
A large multicentre study reported the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients was 25.8% one week after major non-cardiac surgery, and 9.9% three months after major non-cardiac surgery.23 The authors used the MMSE, and six other neuropsychological tests. The reported incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction ranges between 2841% for elderly patients in the orthopedic surgery group.4,5 The wide range for reported incidence might be attributed to differences in diagnostic criteria, populations under study, and differences in surveillance methods.6 The low incidence of reported postoperative cognitive dysfunction in our study may be related to the small sample size.
Postoperatively, we did not find significant differences in the neuropsychological tests between the BIS group and the SP group. The MMSE, Trieger Dot Test, and DSST were used in this study because they are commonly used tests of cognition which are easy to conduct, have a high compliance rate among elderly subjects, and can be used for serial testing in fluctuating conditions such as the perioperative period.10,13 The time required to complete the three tests, on average was approximately ten minutes. However, the MMSE, Trieger Dot Test, and DSST may not be sensitive enough to detect mild cognitive deficits, and possible learning effects of repeated tests may have obscured detection of postoperative deterioration in test performance.24 As well, administration of postoperative PCA morphine may have minimized any differences between the two groups.
Another limitation of this study is that the power analysis was based on detecting a difference in early recovery i.e., the time to orientation between the two groups. Thus, the sample size may be inadequate to detect a difference in the level of postoperative cognitive dysfunction between the two groups.
None of the patients in our study reported recall; however, we would require a larger sample size to find a difference between the two groups since the incidence of intraoperative recall during general anesthesia is low.25
In summary, titrating isoflurane using BIS monitoring led to a 30% reduction of isoflurane maintenance requirements, and faster emergence and earlier recovery of elderly patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty.
| APPENDIX Postoperative questionnaire |
|---|
|
|
|---|
What is the first thing that you remember after your operation?
Can you remember anything between those two periods?
Did you dream during your operation?
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Revision received October 22, 2001. Accepted for publication August 10, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2
Dodds C, Allison J. Postoperative cognitive deficit in the elderly surgical patient. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 44962.
3 Gustafson Y, Brannstrom B, Berggren D, et al. A geriatric-anesthesiologic program to reduce acute confusional states in elderly patients treated for femoral neck fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 65562.[Medline]
4 Williams-Russo P, Urquhart BL, Sharrock NE, Charlson ME. Post-operative delirium: predictors and prognosis in elderly orthopedic patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 75967.[Medline]
5 Rogers MP, Liang MH Daltroy LH, et al. Delirium after elective orthopedic surgery: risk factors and natural history. Int J Psychiatry Med 1989; 19: 10921.[Medline]
6
O'Keeffe ST, Chonchubhair AN. Postoperative delirium in the elderly. Br J Anaesth 1994, 73: 67387.
7 Johansen JW, Sebel PS. Development and clinical application of electroencephalographic bispectrum monitoring. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 133644.[Medline]
8 Gan TJ, Glass PS, Windsor A, et al. Bispectral index monitoring allows faster emergence and improved recovery from propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 80815.[Medline]
9 Song D, Joshi GP, White PF. Titration of volatile anesthetics using bispectral index facilitates recovery after ambulatory anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 8428.[Medline]
10 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 18998.[Medline]
11 Parikh SS, Chung F. Postoperative delirium in the elderly. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 122332.[Abstract]
12
Chung FF, Chung A, Meier RH, Lautenschlaeger E, Seyone C. Comparison of perioperative mental function after general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia with intravenous sedation. Can J Anaesth 1989; 36: 3827.
13 Letourneau JE, Denis R. The reliability and validity of the Trieger tests as a measure of recovery from general anesthesia in a day-care surgery unit. Anesth Prog 1983; 5: 1525.
14 Dion P. The cost of anesthetic vapours (Letter). Can J Anaesth 1992; 39: 6334.[Medline]
15
Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970; 49: 92434.
16 Pousada L, Leipzig RM. Rapid bedside assessment of postoperative confusion in older patients. Geriatrics 1990; 45: 5966.
17 Doenicke AW, Roizen MF, Hoernecke R, Harbauer K, Schubert S, Zaba Z. TIVA with etomidate or propofol in day-case surgery: is the bispectral index a useful parameter to lower the maintenance dose? Anesth Analg 1999, 88: S53 (abstract).
18 Stevens WC, Dolan WM, Gibbons RT, et al. Minimum alveolar concentrations (MAC) of isoflurane with and without nitrous oxide in patients of various ages. Anesthesiology 1975; 42: 197200.[Medline]
19 Katoh T, Suguro Y, Ikeda T, Kazama T, Ikeda K. Influence of age on awakening concentrations of sevoflurane and isoflurane. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 34852.[Medline]
20 Gold MI, Abello D, Herrington C. Minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane in patients older than 65 yr. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 7104.[Medline]
21 Katoh T, Bito H, Sato S. Influence of age on hypnotic requirement, bispectral index, and 95% spectral edge frequency associated with sedation induced by sevoflurane. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 5561.[Medline]
22 Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K, et al. Comparison of the effect-site keos of propofol for blood pressure and EEG bispectral index in elderly and younger patients. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 151727.[Medline]
23 Moller JT, Cluitmans P, Rasmussen LS, et al. Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: ISPOCD1 study. Lancet 1998; 351: 85761.[Medline]
24
Dijkstra JB, Houx PJ, Jolles J. Cognition after major surgery in the elderly: test performance and complaints. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 86774.
25 Ranta SO-V, Laurila R, Saario J, Ali-Melkkilä T, Hynynen M. Awareness with recall during general anesthesia: incidence and risk factors. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 10849.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. S. Cheng, J. Yeh, and P. Flood Anesthesia Matters: Patients Anesthetized with Propofol Have Less Postoperative Pain than Those Anesthetized with Isoflurane Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 264 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Gaba Correlation of the Depth of Anesthesia with POCD (Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction) Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1298 - 1298. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schubert, E. Farag, and E. J. Mascha Correlation of the Depth of Anesthesia with POCD (Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction) Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1298 - 1299. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Aime, N. Verroust, C. Masson-Lefoll, G. Taylor, P.-A. Laloe, N. Liu, and M. Fischler Does Monitoring Bispectral Index or Spectral Entropy Reduce Sevoflurane Use? Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1469 - 1477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Zohar, I. Luban, P. F. White, E. Ramati, S. Shabat, and B. Fredman Bispectral index monitoring does not improve early recovery of geriatric outpatients undergoing brief surgical procedures: [Le monitorage avec l'index bispectral n'ameliore pas la recuperation precoce des patients ambulatoires ages apres une operation breve] Can J Anesth, January 1, 2006; 53(1): 20 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. White, J. Tang, G. F. Romero, R. H. Wender, R. Naruse, A. Sloninsky, and R. Kariger A Comparison of State and Response Entropy Versus Bispectral Index Values During the Perioperative Period Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 160 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Erden, Z. Yangin, K. Erkalp, H. Delatioglu, F. Bahceci, and A. Seyhan Increased Progesterone Production During the Luteal Phase of Menstruation May Decrease Anesthetic Requirement Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2005; 101(4): 1007 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Tobias and R. Grindstaff Bispectral Index Monitoring During the Administration of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patient J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2005; 20(4): 233 - 237. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Passot, F. Servin, J. Pascal, F. Charret, C. Auboyer, and S. Molliex A Comparison of Target- and Manually Controlled Infusion Propofol and Etomidate/Desflurane Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1338 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |