CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, M.
Right arrow Articles by Namiki, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, M.
Right arrow Articles by Namiki, A.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 49:1100-1101 (2002)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2002


Correspondence

Fentanyl abolishes the hyperdynamic response to isoflurane without affecting the change in bispectral index

Masayasu Nakayama, MD, Michiko Hayashi, MD, Noriaki Kanaya, MD and Akiyoshi Namiki, MD PhD

Sapporo, Japan

To the Editor:

A sudden increase in the inspired isoflurane concentration activates adrenosympathetic function, resulting in tachycardia and hypertension.1–5 We studied the effect of fentanyl on the changes in hemodynamics and the hypnotic level, as measured by bispectral index (BIS), after a sudden increase in isoflurane concentration. Forty-two adult patients (ASA I–II) were anesthetized with either 2 mg•kg-1 thiamylal (control group, n = 22) or 2 µg•kg-1 fentanyl followed by 2 mg•kg-1 thiamylal (fentanyl group, n = 20). Mask inhalation of isoflurane at 0.5% in 100% oxygen began after loss of consciousness. Two minutes later, the vapourizer setting for isoflurane was suddenly increased to 3.5% and maintained for five minutes. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and BIS (Model A1050; Aspect Medical Systems, Natick, MA, USA) were measured every minute. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA.

Anesthetic induction with thiamylal did not change HR or MAP but significantly reduced BIS in both groups (FigureGo). The increase in isoflurane concentration significantly increased HR and MAP in the control group. In contrast, in the fentanyl group, HR did not change and MAP decreased significantly. Two minutes after the isoflurane concentration had been increased, BIS significantly and progressively decreased to about 50 in both groups. There were no inter-group differences in the BIS value throughout the study period.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE Changes in heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and bispectral index (BIS) after anesthetic induction with thiamylal and high concentrations of isoflurane with or without fentanyl pretreatment. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. BL = baseline; LER = loss of eyelash reflex. *P < 0.05 vs the control group; {dagger}P < 0.05 vs values at LER.

 
This result suggests that a small dose of fentanyl can abolish the airway-irritating effect of isoflurane without affecting the hypnotic action of isoflurane as measured by BIS.

References

1 Randell T, Seppala T, Lindgren L. Isoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen increases plasma concentrations of noradrenaline but attenuates the pressor response to intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991; 35: 600–5.[Medline]

2 Yli-Hankala A, Randell T, Seppala T, Lindgren L. Increases in hemodynamic variables and catecholamine levels after rapid increase in isoflurane concentration. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 266–71.[Medline]

3 Ebert TJ, Muzi M. Sympathetic hyperactivity during desflurane anesthesia in healthy volunteers. A comparison with isoflurane. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 444–53.[Medline]

4 Tanaka S, Tsuchida H, Namba H, Namiki A. Clonidine and lidocaine inhibition of isoflurane-induced tachycardia in humans. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 1341–9.[Medline]

5 Nakayama M, Hayashi M, Ichinose H, Yamamoto S, Kanaya N, Namiki A. Values of the bispectral index do not parallel the hemodynamic response to the rapid increase in isoflurane concentration. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 958–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, M.
Right arrow Articles by Namiki, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, M.
Right arrow Articles by Namiki, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS