CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greschner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stasiuk, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greschner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stasiuk, R.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 49:217-218 (2002)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2002


Correspondence

Improving styletted oral tracheal intubation: rational use of the OTSU

M. Greschner, BSC MSC MD CM FRCPC

Moncton, New Brunswick

To the Editor:

How fortuitous that Dr. Stasiuk's article on the "rational use of the ‘oral tracheal stylet unit' (OTSU)" appears on 911 of the October issue of the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia for it is clearly a cry for help! In the operating rooms (OR) at the Moncton Hospital, rather than having to ensure that my ‘OTSU' is configured as in Figures 1 and 2 and then having to decide whether to hold it as in Figures 3 or 4, I simply ask my anesthesia assistant to remove the stylet. I strongly suspect that the real problem that Dr. Stasiuk is facing is a lack of a competent anesthesia assistant. If we in the rest of Canada made it a requirement that a competent anesthesia assistant be available at all times in every OR (as has been the standard enjoyed for years by our Québecois colleagues, who have a respiratory therapist to assist them in each OR), then Dr. Stasiuk would not need to figure out ways to do things on his own and publication of such articles would not be deemed necessary.

Reference

1 Stasiuk RBP. Improving styletted oral tracheal intubation: rational use of the OTSU. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 911–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


 

Improving styletted oral tracheal intubation: rational use of the OTSU

Russell Stasiuk, MD FRCPC

Vancouver, British Columbia

Letters to the Editor on styletted oral tracheal intubation reflect a broad cross section of views held by many experienced anesthesiologists. Their diverse philosophies on choice of intubating technique range from using a styletted tracheal tube when intubation becomes problematic1 to requiring the assistance of a helper with all patients. However, every anesthesiologist at some time will be faced with a life-threatening crisis in airway management that requires immediate and effective tracheal intubation using only universally available equipment, i.e., the laryngoscope, tracheal tube, and stylet. Everyone in clinical anesthesia must decide whether their personal technique is flexible enough to achieve successful placement of the endotracheal tube at initial laryngoscopy under truly adverse circumstances. If the answer is no, then a re-thinking of how one approaches intubation is required.

The purpose of my article was to inform the reader of a technique of intubation, evolved through thousands of uses, that maximizes successful tracheal tube placement under a variety of situations.2 To attain clinical proficiency, it is necessary, first, to understand the relationships between the airway, laryngoscopy, shape and delivery of the OTSU, and how glottic placement of the tracheal tube tip is recognized. Second, it requires each step be performed in its proper sequence and practiced with every intubation.

Use of the OTSU is not a quick fix or after thought when dealing with a difficult intubation. It is an extension of the process used for simple, routine intubations, and its successful application depends upon familiarity with the technique gained from managing many patients with a spectrum of airways.

Not everyone will agree that re-evaluation of the intubating process is necessary or will commit to mastering this technique. The groups most likely to respond and benefit are: a) resident staff, relatively new to anesthesia, who are receptive and motivated to learn an advanced skill; b) individuals, who after having experienced problems with intubation, remark – "there must be a better way"; and c) anesthesiologists who accept the intellectual challenge needed to study, understand, and acquire the technical skills for intubating quickly and easily. All will find a dramatic drop in the number of intubations previously considered difficult, and when confronted with exceptionally difficult airways will intubate successfully thereby preventing potential injury to their patients.

References

1 Stix M, Mancini E. How a rigid stylet can make and endotracheal tube move. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 1008.[Free Full Text]

2 Stasiuk RBP. Improving styletted oral tracheal intubation: rational use of the OTSU. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 911–8.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greschner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stasiuk, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greschner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stasiuk, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS