CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Grover, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Grover, N.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 49:530-531 (2002)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2002


Correspondence

Non-pharmacological relief of acute pain following total abdominal hysterectomy

Manpreet Singh, MBBS, Rashid M. Khan, MD, S. Bano, MD, Wasimul Huda, MBBS, Seema Hakim, MD and Namita Grover, MBBS

Aligarh, India

To the Editor:

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been used effectively to reduce postoperative pain.1,2 Unfortunately, TENS is seldom available to the anesthesiologist in the operation theatre. We undertook a study to observe the efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) induced electrical stimulation in comparison to TENS as a mode of postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing elective total abdominal hysterectomy for the first 24 hr after surgery since both devices can deliver a similar configuration of current intensity and frequency.3,4 Forty-five ASA I and II patients (mean age 50.6 ± 5.03 yr, mean weight 50.21 ± 6.39 kg) were selected for this study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups of 15 patients each. Group I received Sham TENS (with reversed electrodes), Group II received conventional TENS (frequency 100 Hz, intensity 40–60 mA) and Group III received electrical stimulation by PNS (frequency 100 Hz, intensity 10–20 mA) for pain relief. Each period of monophasic rectangular pulsed electrical stimulation3,4 lasted for 20 min. This was administered on arrival in the recovery room and then eight and 16 hr later in the ward. Twenty minutes of TENS stimulation administered every eight hours has been reported earlier for relief of postoperative upper abdominal pain.1 All patients received a uniform premedication, general anesthetic technique and postoperative care. Before applying the dressing, para-incision electrodes were applied to deliver electrical stimulation.

Pain relief was graded as good = no pain, satisfactory = bearable pain not requiring rescue analgesia, unsatisfactory = unbearable pain requiring rescue analgesia (tramadol 2 mg•kg–1). It was observed that 66.66% and 73.33% patients of Groups II and III respectively had good postoperative analgesia during the study period (TableGo). On the contrary, 86.66% of the patients in the Sham TENS group had unsatisfactory pain relief. The mean doses of tramadol per kilogram body weight in the first 24 hr was 1.193 mg•kg–1 and 0.828 mg•kg–1 in Groups II and III respectively, compared to 3.680 mg•kg–1 in Group I patients. This difference between Groups II and III, compared to Group I was statistically significant (unpaired t test, P < 0.05). 73.33% and 80% of patients in Groups II and III respectively expressed their willingness to opt for a similar technique for postoperative pain relief in the future. We conclude that electrostimulation delivered with a PNS can provide good pain relief in the postoperative period in patients undergoing open abdominal hysterectomy. Pain relief was comparable to conventional TENS.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE Duration of satisfactory analgesia (hr)
 

References

1 VanderArk GD, McGrath KA. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation in treatment of postoperative pain. Am J Surg 1975; 130: 338–40.[Medline]

2 Bayindir O, Paker T, Akpinar B, Erenturk S, Askin D, Aytac A. Use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the control of postoperative chest pain after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1991; 5: 589–91.[Medline]

3 Brull SJ. Muscle Relaxants: what should I monitor and what does it tell me? In: Mcleskey CH (Ed.). 49th ASA Annual Refresher Course Lectures. Orlando, 1998: 422: 1–7.

4 Tasker RR. Neurostimulation and percutaneous neural destructive techniques. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO (Eds.). Neural Blockade, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company, 1988: 1085–117.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Grover, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Grover, N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS