CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, D.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 49:554-560 (2002)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2002

General Anesthesia

Acupressure and ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

[L'acupression et l'ondansétron contre les nausées et les vomissements suivant la cholécystectomie laparoscopique]

Anil Agarwal, MD*, Neeta Bose, MD*, Atul Gaur, MD*, Uttam Singh, PhD{dagger}, Mithlesh Kumar Gupta, MD* and Dinesh Singh, MD*

* From the Department of Anesthesia, and
{dagger} Biostatistics, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Anil Agarwal, Type IV / 48, S.G.P.G.I.M.S., Lucknow, 226 014, India. Phone: +91-522-440004-8, ext. 2473(O), 2474(R); Fax: +91-522-440017, 440047, 440078; E-mail: aagarwal{at}sgpgi.ac.in


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of acupressure wrist bands and ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Methods: One hundred and fifty ASA I–II, patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in a randomized, prospective, double-blind and placebo-controlled study. Patients were divided into three groups of 50. Group I was the control; Group II received ondansetron 4 mg iv just prior to induction of anesthesia; in Group III acupressure wristbands were applied at the P6 points. Acupressure wrist bands were placed inappropriately in Groups I and II. The acupressure wrist bands were applied 30 min prior to induction of anesthesia and removed six hours following surgery. Anesthesia was standardized. PONV were evaluated separately as none, mild, moderate or severe within six hours of patients' arrival in the postanesthesia care unit and then at 24 hr after surgery by a blinded observer. If patients vomited more than once, they were given 4 mg ondansetron iv as the rescue antiemetic. Results were analyzed by Z test. A P value of < 0.05 was taken as significant.

Results: The incidence of PONV and the requirement of rescue medication were significantly lower in both the acupressure and ondansetron groups during the first six hours.

Conclusion: Acupressure at P6 causes a significant reduction in the incidence of PONV and the requirement for rescue medication in the first six hours following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, similar to that of ondansetron 4 mg iv.


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
POSTOPERATIVE nausea and vomiting (PONV) is frequent in patients undergoing general anesthesia. This is a distressing experience for patients. When symptoms persist, they may lead to dehydration, electrolyte imbalance and delayed hospital discharge. This may have significant implications regarding cost of therapy especially in day stay surgery. More serious complications may ensue, including tension on suture lines, venous hypertension and increased bleeding under skin flaps affecting quality of surgical outcome. The patients are at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration of vomitus as the airway reflexes are depressed postoperatively.1

The incidence of PONV may be as high as 60–70%, and is influenced by various patient related factors, type of surgery, anesthesia technique and drugs used and postoperative factors such as pain, dizziness, ambulation, usage of opiods etc.1,2–5 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy predisposes the patient to several stimuli which can induce vomiting. Various pharmacological means are available to alleviate PONV, but may cause side effects varying from lethargy, restlessness, tachycardia, extrapyramidal symptoms, dystonic reactions increasing the incidence of delayed discharge and unintended hospital re-admissions.

Acupuncture and acupressure are methods used by alternative medicine with varying results for the treatment of nausea and vomiting due to morning sickness,6 chemotherapy,7 general anesthesia,8 and postoperative morphine administration.9 Acupuncture and acupressure are based on the belief that an individual's well being depends on the balance of energy in the body. It is hypothesized that energy flows within the body along paths referred to as meridians and these techniques restore the balance of energy by manipulating these meridians.10 P6 (Nei-guan) a Chinese meridian point is used for the treatment of nausea and vomiting. The present study was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of acupressure wrist bands with ondansetron in preventing PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


    Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Following approval from our institutional Research Committee and Ethical Clearance, informed consent was obtained from all patients included in this study. One hundred and fifty patients of either sex, aged between 18 and 60 yr, ASA grade I–II, undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this randomized, prospective, double-blind and placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized into three groups of 50 each using a table of random numbers:

Group I – Control
Group II – Ondansetron
Group III – Acupressure

In Groups I and II, the spherical beads of the acupressure wrist bands were placed inappropriately on the posterior surface of both forearms 30 min prior to induction of anesthesia. Group II patients received ondansetron 4 mg iv just before induction. In Group III patients' acupressure bands were applied at the P6 point on both forearms 30 min before induction of anesthesia. Groups I and III patients received normal saline 1 mL iv just before induction of anesthesia to maintain blinding.

The acupressure wrist band has an adjustable strap 1.5 cm in width, a spherical plastic bead and a Velcro fastener to hold the bead in position (Figure 1Go). The treatment point P6 (Nei-Guan) is located on the anterior surface of the forearm approximately 1 cm deep to the skin, 2 body inches proximal to the distal crease of the wrist joint between the two tendons of flexor carpi radialis and palmaris longus. One body inch is equal to the width of the interphalangeal joint of the patient's thumb. The acupressure band was placed around the wrist, such that patient felt gentle pressure without discomfort. To confirm that compression was not excessive, a pulse oximeter was placed on the index finger to confirm adequate blood flow. Wrist bands were considered too loose and were tightened if a wedge of paper could fit between the pressure band and skin. Forearms were raised by 60 at the elbow and venous emptying occurred normally in all cases.



View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1 Location of P6 meridian point and the proper application of the acupressure wristband (see methods for details)

 
Exclusion criteria included patient's refusal to participate in the study, previous history of PONV and travel sickness, impaired renal function with increased urea and creatinine concentrations, diabetes mellitus, obesity, patients receiving antiemetic medication or a histamine H2-receptor antagonist within 72 hr of surgery.

Anesthesia was standardized. No antiemetic medication was given before or during the operation. All patients received 2 mg lorazepam po the night before surgery and two hours prior to surgery with sips of water. Anesthesia was induced with 2 µg•kg-1 fentanyl iv and 4–5 mg•kg-1 thiopentone and maintained with isoflurane 0–1% and nitrous oxide 60% in oxygen. Neuromuscular block was provided by vecuronium. At the end of the surgical procedure patients were extubated in the operating room after reversal of the neuromuscular block with neostigmine and atropine. Postoperative analgesia was provided with 100 mg diclofenac im every eight hours. The acupressure wrist band was removed six hours postoperatively.

The incidence of PONV was evaluated within six hours of the patient's arrival in the postanesthesia care unit and then at 24 hr after surgery by a blinded observer. The results were scored as none, nausea, retching/vomiting. Patients experiencing both nausea and vomiting were included in the vomiting group.11 Nausea was graded by visual analogue scale from 1–10 (1 = none, 2–5 = mild, 6–7 = moderate and 8–10 = severe). Vomiting and retching were not distinguished and their severity was classified using the number of episodes over 24 hr i.e., none, mild (0–2), moderate (3–5), or severe (> 5).12 If patients vomited more than once, they were given 4 mg ondansetron iv as the rescue antiemetic.

Patients' characteristics in the three groups were assessed using an unpaired Student's t test. PONV data was analyzed using a Z test to compare the occurrence in all three groups. Comparisons between groups were performed for overall nausea and retching/vomiting. Nausea and retching/vomiting were then compared separately at various levels of severity. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients were comparable in all three groups with regard to age, sex, height, weight and duration of surgery (Table IGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I Demographic data and duration of surgery
 
The incidence of PONV in the first six hours after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the control group was 44%. The acupressure and ondansetron groups had a significant decrease in the incidence of PONV during the same period (10% and 8% respectively). There was no significant difference in PONV in the six to 24 hr following laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery in all three groups (Figure 2Go, Tables II and IIIGoGo). A significant decrease in the requirement for rescue medication in groups II and III was observed in the first six hours following surgery. Antiemetic requirements were similar in the three groups at 24 hr following surgery (Tables II and IIIGoGo). No side effects or complications were observed due to the placement of acupressure wrist bands.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2 Number of patients presenting with nausea or vomiting during the first six hours (N6 and V6) and from 6-24 hr (N6-24 and V6-24) respectively after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II Incidence of nausea / vomiting / requirement of rescue antiemetics within six hours and between six to 24 hr following laparoscopic cholecystectomy
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE III Severity of nausea / vomiting within six hours following laparoscopic cholecystectomy
 

    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the treatment of cholelithiasis is popular amongst surgeons as well as patients due to its associated advantages, which includes a short hospital stay. The latter advantage has been negated by PONV, which is turning out to be the leading cause of unexpected re-admission after day surgery.13,14 The incidence of PONV has been reported to be as high as 53–72%.15 After laparoscopic cholecystectomy up to 70% patients have PONV if they are not on any antiemetic prophylaxis.16–18

The etiology of PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not wholly understood. Risk factors such as a prolonged CO2 insufflation, gall bladder surgery, intraoperative use of isoflurane, fentanyl and glycopyrrolate, female sex and postoperative use of patient controlled analgesia with morphine may contribute to these episodes.1,15,17,19,20 CO2 insufflation significantly increases peritoneal pressure, reduces intestinal blood flow and leads to intestinal ischemia and release of emetogenic substances.14 Also, the emetic centre is stimulated by the afferents from the gastro-intestinal track manipulated during surgery.1 Intraoperative hypotension may cause brainstem hypoxia and thus trigger the vomiting centre to induce emesis.21 Further, the intestinal tissue is active metabolically and has a poor tolerance for even brief periods of hypoxia/ischemia. An important intestinal response to ischemia is the release of serotonin, a highly emetogenic substance.

There are various drug therapies for the prevention of PONV. Droperidol is an effective antiemetic, but is associated with side effects such as agitation, sedation, extra-pyramidal reactions and delayed awakening with large doses. Smaller doses of (0.625 mg) of droperidol are as effective as larger doses (1.25 mg) and 4 mg iv ondansetron. Lower doses of droperidol may also be associated with restlessness.18 Transdermal scopolamine decreases PONV after laparoscopic surgeries, but 91% of patients experience side effects.13,22 Phenothiazines and antihistamines can produce sedation and lethargy. Metoclopramide is also an effective antiemetic but not without side effects including dystonic reactions, restlessness and tachycardia. Symptoms resembling parkinsonism have also been reported in children.23 Antagonists at the NK1 receptor represent a new class of antiemetics, which is still under investigation.24

Ondansetron, a 5-hydroxy tryptamine subtype 3 (5HT3) receptor antagonist, is an effective antiemetic for the prevention and treatment of PONV.1,13 It has been extremely useful in reducing PONV in women undergoing ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopic procedures. Despite its advantages, including minimal side effects, it is expensive compared with other antiemetics and may consume a major portion of an anesthetic pharmacy budget.18,25

Non-pharmacological methods like acupuncture, acupressure and laser stimulation have shown comparable antiemetic efficacy.26 The P6 (Nei-Guan) meridian point in acupuncture has been used to treat vomiting and other stomach ailments in traditional Chinese medical practice. In 1990, Dundee showed that acupuncture or acupressure at the P6 meridian point was as effective as a standard antiemetic in the treatment of nausea and vomiting.27

The mechanism of action of acupressure is not clear. It is postulated that acupressure causes low frequency electrical stimulation of the skin sensory receptors which may activate A ß and A {delta} fibres. These fibres synapse within the dorsal horn and may, in turn, cause release of endorphins from the hypothalamus. Increased levels of ß-endorphin concentration have been reported in human cerebrospinal fluid after acupuncture stimulation.21,28 In addition, serotonergic and norepinerphrinergic fibres may be activated and a possible change in serotonin levels has a role in prevention of PONV. It is also postulated that opiods may have antiemetic effects mediated by the action of ß-endorphins on µ receptors. Acupressure has been shown to enhance gastric motility.29 There is also a possible role of central dopaminergic receptors in acupuncture. The antiemetic effect of the P6 point may be mediated by an action opposing to that of central dopamine.30

Acupuncture and acupressure at the P6 point is associated with mixed clinical results. Harmon,4 Stein,21 Fan,31 and Dundee27,32,33 have observed a decrease in the incidence of PONV after P6 stimulation. The important component of this treatment includes the timing of stimulation31,34 and correct point location.31,35 For acupressure to be effective, it has to be applied prior to the emetic stimulus. A meta analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of non-pharmacological techniques such as acupuncture, electro-acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, acupoint stimulation and acupressure for the prevention of PONV.36 Non-pharmacological techniques were more effective in comparison to placebo for the prevention of PONV within six hours of surgery in adults.36 However, P6 stimulation was ineffective in minimizing PONV in children following tonsillectomy and strabismus surgery.37–39 Similarly, acupressure has been ineffective in cases of urological endoscopic surgery and pregnancy.40,41

In summary we compared acupressure with ondansetron and placebo for the prevention of PONV in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We observed that the incidence of PONV and the requirement for rescue antiemetics were significantly lower in the acupressure and ondansetron groups in the first six hours following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, there was no significant difference in PONV and the antiemetics required at 24 hr following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in all three groups.

Revision received March 15, 2002. Accepted for publication January 23, 2002.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1 Watcha MF, White PF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Its etiology, treatment, and prevention. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 162–84.[Medline]

2 Korttila K. The study of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69(Suppl. 1): 20S–3S.

3 Haley S, Edelist G, Urbach G. Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and enflurane as supplements to general anaesthesia for outpatient gynaecologic surgery. Can J Anaesth 1988; 35: 570–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4 Harmon D, Gardiner J, Harrison R, Kelly A. Acupressure and the prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 387–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5 Watcha MF, Simeon RM, White PF, Stevens JL. Effect of propofol on the incidence of postoperative vomiting after strabismus surgery in pediatric outpatients. Anesthesiology 1991; 75: 204–9.[Medline]

6 Dundee JW, Sourial FBR, Ghaly RG, Bell PF. P6 acupressure reduces morning sickness. J R Soc Med 1988; 81: 456–7.[Abstract]

7 Dundee JW, Ghaly RG, Fitzpatrick KTJ, Lynch G, Abram P. Optimising antiemesis in cancer chemotherapy (Letter). Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987; 294: 179.

8 Dundee JW, Ghaly RG, Bill KM, Chestnutt WN, Fitzpatrick KTJ, Lynas AGA. Effect of stimulation of the P6 antiemetic point on postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63: 612–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 Ho CM, Hseu SS, Tsai SK, Lee TY. Effect of P-6 acupressure on prevention of nausea and vomiting after epidural morphine for post-cesarean section pain relief. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 40: 372–5.[Medline]

10 Vincent CA, Richardson PH. The evaluation of therapeutic acupuncture: concepts and methods. Pain 1986; 24: 1–13.[Medline]

11 Allen DL, Kitching AJ, Nagle C. P6 acupressure and nausea and vomiting after gynaecological surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 1994; 22: 691–3.[Medline]

12 Tigerstedt I, Salmela L, Aromaa U. Double-blind comparison of transdermal scopolamine, droperidol and placebo against postoperative nausea and vomiting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1988: 32: 454–7.[Medline]

13 Liberman MA, Howe S, Lane M. Ondansetron versus placebo for prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2000; 179: 60–2.[Medline]

14 Goll V, Akça O, Greif R, et al. Ondansetron is no more effective than supplemental intraoperative oxygen for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 112–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15 Wang JJ, Ho ST, Liu YH, et al. Dexamethasone reduces nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 772–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16 Parlow JL, Meikle AT, van Vlymen J, Avery N. Post discharge nausea and vomiting after ambulatory laparoscopy is not reduced by promethazine prophylaxis. Can J Anesth 1999; 46: 719–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17 Naguib M, El Bakry AKE, Khoshim MHB, et al. Prophylactic antiemetic therapy with ondansetron, tropisetron, granisetron and metoclopramide in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, double-blind comparison with placebo. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 226–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18 Tang J, Watcha MF, White PF. A comparison of costs and efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol as prophylactic antiemetic therapy for elective outpatient gynecologic procedures. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 304–13.[Abstract]

19 Cohen MM, Duncan PG, DeBoer DP, Tweed WA. The postoperative interview: assessing risk factors for nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 7–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20 Fredman B, Jedeikin R, Olsfanger D, Flor P, Gruzman A. Residual pneumoperitoneum: a cause of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 152–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21 Stein DJ, Birnbach DJ, Danzer BI, Kuroda MM, Grunebaum A, Thys DM. Acupressure versus intravenous metoclopramide to prevent nausea and vomiting during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 342–5.[Abstract]

22 Bailey PL, Streisand JB, Pace NL, et al. Transdermal scopolamine reduces nausea and vomiting after outpatient laparoscopy. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 977–80.[Medline]

23 Ferrari LR, Donlon JV. Metoclopramide reduces the incidence of vomiting after tonsillectomy in children. Anesth Analg 1992; 75: 351–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24 Heffernan AM, Rowbotham DJ. Postoperative nausea and vomiting – time for balanced antiemesis? (Editorial). Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 675–7.[Free Full Text]

25 Kapur PA. Pharmacy acquisition costs: responsible choices versus overutilization of costly pharmaceuticals (Editorial). Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 617–8.[Free Full Text]

26 White PF. Are nonpharmacologic techniques useful alternatives to antiemetic drugs for the prevention of nausea and vomiting? Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 712–4.[Medline]

27 Dundee JW. Belfast experience with P6 acupuncture antiemesis. Ulster Med J 1990; 59: 63–70.[Medline]

28 Clement-Jones V, McLoughlin L, Tomlin S, Besser GM, Rees LH, Wen HL. Increased ß-endorphin but not metenkephalin levels in human cerebrospinal fluid after acupuncture for recurrent pain. Lancet 1980; 1: 946–8.

29 Lin X, Liang J, Ren J, Mu F, Zhang M, Chen JDZ. Electrical stimulation of acupuncture points enhances gastric myoelectrical activity in humans. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 1527–30.[Medline]

30 Fassoulaki A, Papilas K, Sarantopoulos C, Zotou M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces the incidence of vomiting after hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 1012–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31 Fan CF, Tanhui E, Joshi S, Trivedi S, Hong Y, Shevde K. Acupressure treatment for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 821–5.[Abstract]

32 Dundee JW, McMillan CM. Clinical uses of P6 acupuncture antiemesis. Acupunct Electrother Res 1990; 15: 211–5.[Medline]

33 Dundee JW, Ghaly G. Local anesthesia blocks the antiemetic action of P6 acupuncture. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991; 50: 78–80.[Medline]

34 Dundee JW, Ghaly RG. Does the timing of P6 acupuncture influence it's efficacy as a postoperative antiemetic? Br J Anaesth 1989; 63: 630P.

35 Fitzpatrick KTJ, Dundee JW, Ghaly RG, Patterson CC. Is it necessary always to use the right forearm for acupuncture antiemesis? Br J Anaesth 1988; 61: 117–8P.

36 Lee A, Done ML. The use of nonpharmacologic techniques to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 1362–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37 Shenkman Z, Holzman RS, Kim C, et al. Acupressure – acupuncture antiemetic prophylaxis in children undergoing tonsillectomy. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1311–6.[Medline]

38 Yentis SM, Bissonnette B. P6 acupuncture and postoperative vomiting after tonsillectomy in children. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67: 779–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39 Lewis IH, Pryn SJ, Reynolds PI, Pandit UA, Wilton NCT. Effect of P6 acupressure on postoperative vomiting in children undergoing outpatient strabismus correction. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67: 73–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40 Agarwal A, Pathak A, Gaur A. Acupressure wristbands do not prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting after urological endoscopic surgery. Can J Anesth 2000; 47: 319–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41 O'Brien B, Relyea MJ, Taerum T. Efficacy of P6 acupressure in the treatment of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 708–15.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
S. Thomas and S. Beevi
Dexamethasone reduces the severity of postoperative sore throat: [La dexamethasone reduit la severite du mal de gorge postoperatoire]
Can J Anesth, November 1, 2007; 54(11): 897 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
S. Thomas and S. Beevi
Epidural dexamethasone reduces postoperative pain and analgesic requirements: [L'administration peridurale de dexamethasone reduit la douleur et la demande d'analgesiques postoperatoires].
Can J Anesth, September 1, 2006; 53(9): 899 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
A. L Kovac
Meta-Analysis of the Use of Rescue Antiemetics Following PONV Prophylactic Failure with 5-HT3 Antagonist/Dexamethasone Versus Single-Agent Therapies
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2006; 40(5): 873 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. J. Rowbotham
Recent advances in the non-pharmacological management of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2005; 95(1): 77 - 81.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White, M. A. Hamza, A. Recart, J. E. Coleman, A. R. Macaluso, L. Cox, O. Jaffer, D. Song, and R. Rohrich
Optimal Timing of Acustimulation for Antiemetic Prophylaxis as an Adjunct to Ondansetron in Patients Undergoing Plastic Surgery
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 367 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. J. Gan, K. R. Jiao, M. Zenn, and G. Georgiade
A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Electro-Acupoint Stimulation or Ondansetron Versus Placebo for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2004; 99(4): 1070 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS