CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, D. H
Right arrow Articles by Van Den Kerkhof, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, D. H
Right arrow Articles by Van Den Kerkhof, E.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 49:A22 (2002)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2002


Abstracts - Monday June 24th 2002 1600 - 1800

DRUG SIDE EFFECT REPORTING IN CANADIAN ACADEMIC ACUTE PAIN SERVICES

David H Goldstein, MD FRCPC and Elizabeth Van Den Kerkhof, RN DrPH

Department of Anesthesiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative pain is usually managed by Acute Pain Management Services1,2. In addition to managing pain, the treatment of therapy side effects is an important aspect of patient care. The purpose of this study was to determine the type and frequency of side effects monitored by Acute Pain Management Services (APMS) in Canadian academic hospitals.

METHODS

62 Canadian hospitals affiliated with academic institutions were surveyed regarding the existence of APMSs. The 93-question survey took approximately 20 minutes to complete and consisted mostly of multiple choice responses with some open-ended questions. The survey included questions about the collection of side effect data.

RESULTS

42 of the 47 (76%) respondents had an APMS. The percent of respondents reporting the collection of side effect information is displayed in the table. Drugs used on APMSs included non-steroidal antiinflammatories, local anesthetics, opiates, antiemetics, and anti-pruritic drugs.

DISCUSSION

The management of acute pain postoperatively has seen dramatic changes over the past decade. Future efforts should address minimum acceptable guidelines for acute pain assessments and documentation, thereby fostering a continuous quality improvement environment.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Percent of APMSs reporting the collection of side effect information

 
REFERENCES

1 Clin J Pain 1989: 5 Suppl 1:S28–33

2 Can J Anaesth 1993;40:568–75[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, D. H
Right arrow Articles by Van Den Kerkhof, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, D. H
Right arrow Articles by Van Den Kerkhof, E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS