CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fehlings, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fehlings, M.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 49:A39 (2002)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2002


Abstracts - Monday June 24th 2002 1600 - 1800

METABOTROPIC GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR IN TRAUMATIC AXONAL INJURY IN THE RAT

Andrew Baker, MD, Nicholas Phan, MD, N. Persaud, Min Zhao, Elaine Liu and Michael Fehlings, MD PhD

Departments of Anesthesia and Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital and The University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario

INTRODUCTION

Following SCI and TBI, secondary injury mechanisms promote axonal damage. We hypothesized that the mGluR1 and mGluR5 receptors are involved in these processes and sought to determine their role in post-traumatic axonal dysfunction.

METHODS

Western immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry were performed on rat corpus callosum following fluid percussion TBI. Compound action potentials (CAPs) were recorded in dorsal columns after SCI and corpus callosum brain slices following TBI. [Ca2+]i fluorescence was measured in spinal cord slices in wild-type and mGluR1-/- mice.

RESULTS

Immunoblots showed increase ßAPP at 24hr, calpain activation at 30min and 24hr, and NF200 breakdown at 7d following TBI. Axonal electrophysiological recovery following in vitro SCI and TBI improved with Group 1 blockade using PHCCC. [Ca2+]i imaging showed a reduction in post-traumatic [Ca2+]i rises with PHCCC and mGluR1 gene deletion. Following TBI, Group 1 mGluRs blockade led to a CAP recovery of 77.1 ± 10.2% compared to 37.6 ± 5.4% in controls. mGluR1 blockade led to a recovery of 52.9 ± 7.4%, while mGluR5 blockade resulted in 63.2 ± 10.3% recovery. All results were statistically significant (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that Group1 mGluRs are involved in axonal dysfunction following neurotrauma. Combined mGlur1 and mGlur5 blockade leads to a better axonal recovery than blockade of each receptor alone.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fehlings, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fehlings, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS