| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |


* From the Departments of Anesthesiology
and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dr. James R. Boyce, Department of Anesthesiology, JT 845Q University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 South 19th Street, Birmingham, AL 35294-6810, USA. Phone: 205-934-6948; Fax: 205-975-3080; E-mail: james.boyce{at}ccc.uab.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Sixty-four patients scheduled for oromaxillofacial surgery under nasal endotracheal anesthesia were recruited. Twenty-eight residents at all levels of training performed FOI through the patients right nostril after the induction of general anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade. Oxygenation and ventilation were maintained by a faculty anesthesiologist using a Sanders device to deliver a jet of oxygen through a nasal trumpet placed in the patients left nostril. The time from induction until completion of the FOI was recorded. Residents were subsequently queried about the educational benefit of the technique using a standardized questionnaire.
Results: All residents were able to successfully intubate all patients in this study. Thirteen residents successfully performed intubations on three or more occasions with 70% performing the technique faster on the third trial than on the first. No evidence of hypoxemia, gastric distension, pneumothorax, hemodynamic instability or recall was observed. All respondents to the questionnaire reported that the technique was useful as an educational tool and recommended its use with other residents.
Conclusion: Transnasal jet ventilation-assisted FOI is a useful method to train residents in FOI while maximizing patient comfort and safety.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, we described a technique to teach FOI under controlled conditions, maximizing the educational experience for the resident as well as safety and comfort for the patient.7 The present communication describes the procedure in more detail and our experience teaching first to third year residents with this technique in anesthetized patients. The report also illustrates the learning curve of residents who were instructed by this technique on three or more occasions.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Each patient was placed on the OR table in a 20° reverse Trendelenburg position and sedated with iv midazolam after routine noninvasive monitors were applied. One millilitre of a solution of 2% lidocaine and 0.1% phenylephrine was instilled in both nasal cavities. Induction of anesthesia was accomplished with fentanyl 3 µgkg-1, lidocaine 1.5 mgkg-1, sodium thiopental 3 to 5 mgkg-1 and rocuronium 0.7 mgkg-1 followed by mask-bag ventilation with 100% oxygen. When anesthesia and neuromuscular paralysis were established, a nasal trumpet, well lubricated with lidocaine jelly was introduced into the left nasal cavity. Ventilation was then accomplished by manual jet ventilation into the lumen of the nasal trumpet using a Sanders jetting device (Mannujet III, VBM Medizintechnic Lans, Sulz, Germany) with a 14-gauge iv catheter attached to the Luer lock of the noncompliant tubing. The driving oxygen pressure was started at 25 psi and increased, as needed, using the reducing valve of the jetting device. If chest expansion was not adequate with each jet inflation, the nasal trumpet was withdrawn and rotated slightly or the driving pressure was increased and jetting resumed. Additional iv hypnotics and opioids were administered as needed according to the vital signs. Eyes were protected with ointment and tape.
The residents were instructed in the basics of fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the OR prior to the patients arrival. The fundamental actions of the flexible bronchoscope tip were demonstrated and a warmed nasal RAE® endotracheal tube was advanced to the most proximal portion of the endoscope (Olympus LF-2, Melville, NY, USA). Most of the instruction, however, was communicated during the endoscopic attempts by the residents. A teaching camera attachment (Olympus OTV-S5) was connected to the eyepiece of the bronchoscope. Concurrent with nasal jet ventilation by the faculty anesthesiologist, the resident proceeded with endoscopy through the opposite nostril (Figure 1
). When the resident had visualized the epiglottis indicating proximity to the glottic aperture, the faculty anesthesiologist changed the intermittent jetting to a low continuous flow of oxygen from the jetting device. After successful cannulation of the trachea the endoscope was removed and the circle system connected to establish positive pressure ventilation. The presence of the end tidal CO2 waveform confirmed successful FOI. The time from the beginning of the iv induction to the appearance of the first end-tidal CO2 waveform was measured and defined as the "intubation time." In order to determine if there was any learning effect associated with the procedure, we compared the intubation times of the first and third FOIs performed by residents who performed at least three FOIs. First vs third trial comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Descriptive statistics are stated as mean values.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
A total of 25 of the 28 residents who had experienced the technique responded to the questionnaire regarding the educational value of the technique; three graduates could not be reached as they had left the program. Responses were overwhelmingly positive with no negative responses and predominantly high endorsements of the educational value of the technique (Figure 3
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The importance of patient selection should be emphasized. The technique, when used for training purposes, should be utilized primarily in patients whose preoperative evaluation would predict easy unobstructed mask ventilation. Therefore, patients with any glottic or supraglottic pathology such as laryngeal cancer or papillomata, base of tongue tumours, retropharyngeal abscess, or any obstructive lesion at the larynx or proximal to it, should not be candidates for this technique.
We arbitrarily placed our patients in a slight reverse Trendelenburg position to maximize chest expansion with minimal jetting pressures. It has been shown in morbidly obese patients that total respiratory compliance is greater in the reverse Trendelenburg position than in the supine position,8 and the same benefit may apply to the non-obese patient as well.
With the camera attachment the faculty anesthesiologist can provide real time guidance and direction to the resident and still maintain adequate oxygenation and ventilation with the transnasal jet ventilation. Often, when the resident had advanced the tip of the bronchoscope close to the glottic aperture, a low continuous flow of oxygen from the jetting device separated the soft tissues such as the epiglottis from the posterior pharyngeal wall and enhanced the view of the cords, expediting successful entry into the tracheal lumen.
Whenever jet ventilation is employed as part of the anesthetic technique, barotrauma is always a concern. The absence of complications related to barotrauma in our study is probably due to two factors. First, since the oral cavity is not sealed, any increased pressure in the oropharynx will easily escape to ambient air through the mouth. Often, with each jet inflation, gas would escape through the lips as well as inflate the lungs. Second, with the vocal cords abducted due to neuromuscular blockade, the jet stream leaving the distal end of the nasal trumpet has unobstructed access to the tracheal lumen. Without neuromuscular paralysis, stimulation by the jet stream can activate the glottic-closure reflex9 causing airway obstruction. For this reason, succinylcholine with its early recovery time may not be an appropriate neuromuscular blocker for this procedure as many of the residents FOI attempts exceeded the duration of muscle paralysis afforded by this agent.
In summary, we have shown that transnasal jet ventilation may be a useful adjunct in teaching FOI. Patient safety and acceptance was demonstrated by adequate oxygenation and ventilation indices, minimal complications, and absence of patient recall. All residents surveyed on this educational experience affirmed its value.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 597602.[Medline]
3 Morris IR. Fibreoptic intubation. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41: 9961008.
4 Koppel JN, Reed AP. Formal instruction in difficult airway management. A survey of anesthesiology residency programs. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 13436.[Medline]
5 Naik VN, Matsumoto, ED, Houston PL, et al. Fiberoptic orotracheal intubation on anesthetized patients. Do manipulation skills learned on a simple model transfer into the operating room? Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 3438.[Medline]
6 Rowe R, Cohen RA. An evaluation of a virtual reality airway simulator. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 626.
7 Boyce JR. Effectiveness of transnasal jet ventilation-a teaching aid (Letter). Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 716.
8 Perilli V, Sollazzi L, Bozza P, et al. The effects of the reverse Trendelenburg position on respiratory mechanics and blood gases in morbidly obese patients during bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 15205.
9 Ikari T, Sasaki CT. Glottic closure reflex: control mechanisms. Ann Otol 1980; 89: 2204.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |