CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuczkowski, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Benumof, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuczkowski, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Benumof, J. L.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 50:159-160 (2003)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2003

Regional Anesthesia and Pain

Images in Anesthesia: Headache caused by pneumocephalus following inadvertent dural puncture during epidural space identification: is it time to abandon the loss of resistance to air technique?

Krzysztof M. Kuczkowski, MD and Jonathan L. Benumof, MD

San Diego, California


Computerized tomography of the cranium. Air is visible within the basilar cisterns and subarachnoid space anteriorly and along the falx over the convexities of the brain.

17-yr-old healthy female at 39 weeks gestation was in labour and requested labour analgesia. During the advancement of the 18-GA Tuohy-Schliff epidural needle at the L3-4 interspace with loss of resistance to air technique (LORA) an inadvertent dural puncture occurred and approximately 4 mL of air in the syringe was injected into the subarachniod space one second before the free flow of cerebral spinal fluid into the syringe established the diagnosis of dural puncture. The patient reported an immediate onset of a severe occipital headache. A second successful epidural attempt was made at the same interspace, this time with the loss of resistance to saline technique. The epidural block provided good pain relief for labour and vaginal delivery. However, the severe occipital headache continued unabated. Neurological examination revealed no deficits. Computed tomography brain scan demonstrated the presence of intracranial air (Figure). The headache was treated conservatively and resolved in seven days. The LORA technique has been linked to complications including air embolism, compression of the cauda equina, increased incidence of dural puncture and pneumocephalus and has been criticized by some.1–5 This case adds one more piece of evidence that the safety of LORA technique should be reconsidered.


    References
 TOP
 References
 
1 Saberski LR, Kondamuri S, Osinubi OY. Identification of the epidural space: is loss of resistance to air a safe technique? A review of the complications related to the use of air. Reg Anesth 1997; 22: 3–15.[Medline]

2 Laviola S, Kirvela M, Spoto MR, Tschuor S, Alon E. Pneumocephalus with intense headache and unilateral pupillary dilatation after accidental dural puncture during epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 582–3.[Free Full Text]

3 Yentis SM. Time to abandon loss of resistance to air. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 184.

4 Gonzalez-Carasco FJ, Aquilar JL, Llubia C, Nogues S, Vidal-Lopez F. Pneumocephalus after accidental dural puncture during epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth 1993; 18: 193–5.[Medline]

5 Aida S. Taga K, Yamakura T, Endoh H, Shimoji K. Headache after attempted epidural block: the role of intrathecal air. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 76–81.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
I. A. Velickovic and P. Rostislav
Pneumocephalus Complicated by Postdural Puncture Headache After Unintentional Dural Puncture
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 747 - 748.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
S. A. Lang
Identification of the epidural space: air or saline?
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2003; 50(8): 860 - 861.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
C. L. Errando
Identification of the epidural space: air or saline?
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2003; 50(8): 861 - 861.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
K. M. Kuczkowski and J. L. Benumof
REPLY
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2003; 50(8): 861 - 862.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Loss of resistance to air is NOT an injection technique
Scott A. Lang
CJA Online, 14 Feb 2003 [Full text]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuczkowski, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Benumof, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuczkowski, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Benumof, J. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS