| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |




* From the Departments of Intensive Care and Neonatology,
Cardiology, and
Anesthesia, University Childrens Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Markus Weiss, Department of Anesthesia, University Childrens Hospital, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland. Phone: + 41 1 266 73 65; Fax: + 41 1 266 79 94; E-mail: markus.weiss{at}kispi.unizh.ch
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: With hospital Ethical Committee approval we studied intubated neonates and infants with a 24-GA radial arterial cannula. Fast flush boluses were delivered from the infusion bag pump flush system by opening the flow regulating device for two seconds at bag pump manometre pressures of 100, 200 and 300 mmHg. In the syringe pump flush system, fast flush bolus volumes of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mL were programmed on the electronic syringe pump and released by opening the flow regulating device for two seconds. A 12-MHz ultrasonic probe placed in the jugular fossa was used to detect white bubbles indicating retrograde embolization of flush solution into the ipsilateral subclavian and common carotid artery.
Results: Sixteen patients, aged from 1105 days (median 22 days) were studied. In all patients retrograde embolization into the subclavian artery was detected at syringe pump bolus volumes of 0.51.5 mL and at 100200 mmHg bag pump pressure. In nine of the 16 patients a positive signal was detected in the common carotid artery with 1.52.0 mL syringe pump bolus volumes and at 200300 mmHg bag pump pressure.
Conclusions: In neonates and infants, the standard practice of arterial fast bolus flushing using syringe pump and bag pump flush systems causes retrograde embolization of flush solution into the central arterial and even into the cerebral circulation. The mandatory limitation of fast flush bolus volumes and manometre pressures is urgent in order to reduce retrograde embolization of flush solution and the associated risks in these small patients.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the many events associated with arterial catheterization, retrograde embolization into the central arterial circulation from flushing the arterial cannula carries a substantial risk, particularly in small patients. Retrograde embolization of clots into the central arterial circulation causing cerebrovascular accidents in adults was first described by Gaan et al.14 Lowenstein et al. found a high correlation between patient height, minimum volume of flush solution and cerebral embolization.15 These results were confirmed in children by Edmonds et al., who reported that a small amount of flush solution (0.3 mL) injected rapidly, could reach the central arterial circulation in a five-month-old baby with a 57-cm body length.16 Ultrasonographic investigations in neonates with radial artery catheters have shown that hand-held syringe flush boluses of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL applied over a one-second period resulted in consistent retrograde embolization of flush solution in the aortic arch and into the left common carotid artery.17 If a five-second injection period was used, no positive signal was detected. Using a radioisotope method, even smaller flushing velocities applied manually were reported to cause retrograde flow in preterm babies with radial artery catheters.18
Whereas retrograde embolization with hand-held syringe flushing is well established, the risk of retrograde embolization of flush solution with routinely used syringe pump and bag pump flush systems remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the current practice of flushing arterial lines in neonates and small infants with respect to the risk of retrograde embolization of flush solution into the central arterial circulation.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An arterial blood pressure transducer set (Baxter, Ad Uden, The Netherlands) including a flow regulating device integrated into the pressure transducer, a 1.8-m long pressure line and a distal three-way stopcock was used in all patients. The three-way stopcock was followed by 10 cm of rigid tubing (PE-infusion line, Clinico Medical GmbH, Bad Mersfeld, Germany) which was connected to the 24-GA radial arterial cannula (0.7 x 19 mm Insyte-W, Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT, USA).
Syringe pump flush system
The electronic syringe pump, flushing the line at a flow rate of 1 mLhr-1, consisted of a Fresenius Injectomat cp-IS syringe pump (Fresenius AG, Bad Homburg, Germany), a 50-mL infusion syringe (Injectomat® - syringe 50 mL, Fresenius AG, Bad Homburg, Germany) filled with heparinized Ringers solution (1 IU heparinmL-1; Liquemin®, Roche Pharma AG, Reinach, Switzerland) and a 50-cm low-compliance infusion line (PE-infusion line, Clinico Medical GmbH, Bad Mersfeld, Germany) connected to the flow regulating device (Figure 1
).
|
Measurements
In patients with an electronic syringe pump system, bolus volumes of # 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2 mL, as used in routine clinical practice, were programmed and started on the electronic syringe pump. As soon as the initiated bolus volume was reached on the syringe pump display the pressurized bolus volume was released by opening the flow regulating device for a two-second period. In patients with a bag pump flush system, fast flush boluses were delivered by opening the flow regulating device for a two-second period at bag pump manometre pressures of 100, 200 mmHg and at a routinely used manometre pressure of 300 mmHg. To avoid introducing air bubbles or blood clots into the pressure line, no blood sampling was performed prior to flushing.
Flushing procedures were performed during routine postoperative echocardiography. A 12-MHz ultrasonic probe (Philips, HP 5500 Sonos, The Netherlands) placed in the jugular fossa was used to detect micro-air bubbles in the bloodstream indicating retrograde embolization of flush solution into the right- or left-sided subclavian and common carotid artery (Figure 2
). Micro-air bubbles are an ultra-sonographic phenomenon, generated by erythrocytes coated with Ringers solution or by Ringers solution itself flushed into the blood stream. As soon as a signal was detected in the common carotid artery, the investigation was stopped in that particular patient with no further increase of bolus volume or bag pump pressure. In addition, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, age, body weight and length were recorded.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In all patients retrograde embolization of flush solution into the ipsilateral subclavian artery was detected by ultrasonography with syringe pump bolus volumes of 0.51.5 mL and at bag pump pressures of 100200 mmHg. In nine of the 14 patients with a right-sided arterial radial cannula, a positive signal was detected in the right common carotid artery with 1.52.0 mL syringe pump bolus volumes and at a bag pump pressure of 200300 mmHg (Table I
). In the two patients with left-sided radial arterial cannulation, a syringe pump bolus volume of 1.5 mL in one patient and a bag pump pressure of 300 mmHg in the other patient resulted in retrograde embolization into the aortic arch, with subsequent flow into the descending aorta.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Flow regulating devices have been designed to provide constant flushing of a catheter system and to isolate the compliant fluid reservoir from the transducer to avoid damping of the blood pressure waveform. Such "regulated flow, isolating flushing devices" were first described by Johnson and Ito and Gardner and colleagues.5,6 They were developed by the Sorenson Research Company as a disposable device for continuous flushing of catheters which incorporates a "fast flush" facility for clearing the line after blood has been sampled. Now, several flow regulating devices are available from different manufacturers, many of which are incorporated into the invasive pressure transducer. Design and function of such flow regulating devices are described in detail by Latimer and Latimer and McKinney and Orr.4,12
Syringe pump flush systems are the standard for neonates and small children. They allow continuous low flow rates of 0.51 mLhr-1 and the use of measured flush boluses. However, dependent on the volume pressurized, the pressure level of the occlusion alarm and the compliance of the syringe infusion pump assembly, fast flush boluses may be released at pressures of up to 2000 mmHg (Table II
). A survey in our neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit revealed that bolus volumes between 1 and 2 mL are routinely preloaded before the flow regulating device is released for cleaning the pressure line. Higher volumes are more effective to purge the catheters.
|
In routine practice, bag pumps are set at a pressure of 300 mmHg. Inaccuracy of manometre pressures and additional hydrostatic pressure column my lead to excessive driving pressures in these flush systems.20
In contrast to the syringe pump flush systems, in which a highly pressurized small bolus volume is stored and then rapidly released, the bag pump flush system represents a pressurized, volume-unlimited "fluid injector", in which a fluid flow is created and then maintained while opening the flow regulating device. The role of opening times was elucidated and reported in our previous in vitro investigations.19
Although the fluid kinetics may be different for the two flush systems, both result in considerably high flow velocities with the associated potential risks. Rapid intra-arterial injection of flush solution can dislodge a thrombus from the cannula tip. Dependent on the volume and velocity of the flush bolus, retrograde embolization of flush solution may carry clot aggregates and air bubbles against the arterial blood flow into the central arteries, from where they are further transported by the arterial antegrade blood stream to distal vessels. In fact, the cerebral circulation may become affected as soon as the subclavian-vertebral junction is reached. Retrograde arterial flow, with or without embolization, is suggested as a possible cause of the association between high umbilical artery catheter positioning and cerebral hemorrhage in very low birthweight infants.21 The proximity of temporal and axillary artery catheters to the carotid bifurcation should also be considered.2224 Embolization into the arterial splanchnic circulation (superior mesenteric artery), particularly with left-sided radial, umbilical and posterior tibial arterial catheter flushing, is also conceivable.17
Rapid flushing not only results in retrograde embolization of flush solution, but also causes local arterial vasospasm, possible damage to the pressure transducer sensor, and transient elevation of arterial blood pressure and intracranial/intraventricular pressure.17 This is likely to be important in the pathogenesis of intraventricular hemorrhage, particularly in infants with preceding asphyxia and associated pressure-dependent blood flow.2527 In addition, it has been suggested that embolization of cold fluid into a vascular bed causes vasospasm, particularly in an abnormally sensitive arterial system or with the accidental use of very cold fluid.15
It is also conceivable that rapid central venous line flushing can result in elevation of right atrial pressure with the risk of paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen oval or an atrial septal defect, a phenomenon used to diagnose right-to-left shunts during echocardiography.28
Because of the constant findings of retrograde embolization of flush solution into the central arterial and even into the cerebral circulation with our routine practice, the study was stopped after 16 patients. Upper limits for manometre bag pressures as well as syringe pump bolus volumes were reduced. Based on our in vivo and in vitro findings, fast bolus flushing with the syringe pump flush system, should be limited to bolus volumes not higher than 0.5 mL. With a bag pump flush system, pressures should be limited to 150 mmHg and short (
one second) opening periods should be used for fast bolus flushing in neonates and infants.20
This study only focussed on one type of flow regulating device. Fast flow velocities from other flow regulating devices may be higher than reported and may vary considerably between different brands.13 Furthermore, the study did not investigate the influence of arterial blood pressure and other patient characteristics on retrograde embolization. However, our results should be representative of neonates and infants up to three months of age.
For safety reasons, flush tests were performed without prior aspiration of blood. The different viscosity of blood and Ringers solution may have resulted in different findings. However, exclusive flushing of Ringers solution through the cannula is common, particularly when the arterial waveform is abnormal.
In summary, routine flushing of arterial lines in neonates and infants using flow regulating devices combined with pressurized syringe pumps or bag pump flush systems results in the retrograde embolization of flush solution into the central arterial and even into the cerebral circulation. Limitation of bolus volumes in syringe pump flush systems, as well as limitation of infusion pressures and duration of flushing with bag pump flush systems, are required to prevent retrograde embolization of flush solution and the associated risks in these small patients.
Revision received November 29, 2002. Accepted for publication August 29, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Sellden H, Nilsson K, Larsson LE, Ekstrom-Jodal B. Radial arterial catheters in children and neonates: a prospective study. Crit Care Med 1987; 15: 11069.[Medline]
3 Wessling KH, Ty Smith N. Availability of intraarterial pressure waveforms from catheter-manometer systems during surgery. J Clin Monit 1985; 1: 116.[Medline]
4 Latimer RD, Latimer KE. Continuous flushing systems. A critical review. Anaesthesia 1974; 29: 30717.[Medline]
5 Johnson DG, Ito T. Continuous flush of arterial pressure-recording catheters. A safe and inexpensive system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969; 57: 6758.[Medline]
6 Gardner RM, Warner HR, Toronto AF, Gaisford WD. Catheter-flush system for continuous monitoring of central arterial pulse waveform. J Appl Physiol 1970; 29: 9113.
7 Meyer CL, Gresham EL, Moye L, Jansen RD, Lemons JA, Schreiner RL. Evaluation of a system for continuous neonatal blood pressure monitoring. Crit Care Med 1982; 10: 68991.[Medline]
8 Haselby KA, Dierdorf SF. A gravity-driven continuous flush system for vascular catheters. Anesth Analg 1982; 10: 8712.
9 Gardner RM, Bond EL, Clark JS. Safety and efficacy of continuous flush systems for arterial and pulmonary artery catheters. Ann Thorac Surg 1977; 23: 5348.[Abstract]
10 Gardner RM, Parker J, Feinauer R. System for umbilical artery monitoring. Crit Care Med 1982; 10: 4568.[Medline]
11 Oh T, Opie NJ, Davis NJ. Continuous flush system for radial artery cannulation. Anaesth Intensive Care 1976; 4: 2932.[Medline]
12 McKinney MS, Orr IA. Characteristics of the pharmaseal continuous flushing device. Anaesthesia 1989; 44: 2424.[Medline]
13 Rithalia SVS, Tinker J. Continuous flush devices for vascular pressure monitoring. Intensive Care Med 1983; 9: 2958.[Medline]
14 Gaan D, Mallick NP, Brewis RAL, Seedat YK. Cerebral damage from declotting Scribner Shunts. Lancet 1969; 2: 779.[Medline]
15 Lowenstein E, Little JW III, Lo HH. Prevention of cerebral embolization from flushing radial-artery cannulas. N Engl J Med 1971; 285: 14145.
16 Edmonds JF, Barker GA, Conn AW. Current concepts in cardiovascular monitoring in children. Crit Care Med 1980; 8: 54853.[Medline]
17 Butt WW, Gow R, Whyte H, Smallhorn J, Koren G. Complications resulting from use of arterial catheters: retrograde flow and rapid elevation in blood pressure. Pediatrics 1985; 76: 2504.
18 Campbell N, Loughnan PM, Duncan AW. The risk of cerebral embolisation from flushing peripheral artery catheters in the newborn. Austr Paediatr J 1982; 18: 141.
19 Cornelius A, Fischer J, Frey B, Baenziger O, Gerber AC, Weiss M. Pressurised bag pump and syringe pump arterial flushing systems: an unregognised hazard in neonates? Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 163843.[Medline]
20 Hug MI, Buettiker V, Cornelius A, Weiss M. Variability in infusion pressure and continuous flow rate delivered from pressurized bag pump flush systems. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30: 3417.[Medline]
21 Schick JB, Beck AL, DeSilva HN. Umbilical artery catheter position and intraventricular hemorrhage. J Perinatol 1989; 9: 3825.[Medline]
22 Prian GW, Wright GB, Rumack CM, OMeara OP. Apparent cerebral embolization after temporal artery catheterisation. J Pediatr 1978; 93: 1158.[Medline]
23 Simmons MA, Levine RL, Lubchenco LO, Guggenheim MA. Warning: serious sequelae of temporal artery catheterization. J Pediatr 1978; 92: 284.[Medline]
24 Moylan SL, Murdoch LJ. A prospective survey of axillary artery cannulation in paediatric intensive care. Paediatr Anaesth 1993; 3: 3740.
25 Goddard J, Lewis RM, Alcala H, Zeller RS. Intraventricular hemorrhage - an animal model. Biol Neonate 1980; 37: 3952.[Medline]
26 Funato M, Tamai H, Noma K, et al. Clinical events in association with timing of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. J Pediatr 1992; 121: 6149.[Medline]
27 Lou HC, Lassen NA, Friis-Hansen B. Impaired autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in the distressed newborn infant. J Pediatr 1979; 94: 11821.[Medline]
28 Valdes-Cruz LM, Pieroni DR, Roland JM, Varghese PJ. Echocardiographic detection of intracardiac right-to-left shunts following peripheral vein injections. Circulation 1976; 54: 55862.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. G. Wade Patient safety in anesthesia - continuing challenges and opportunities/La securite du patient en anesthesie - possibilites et defis permanents Can J Anesth, April 1, 2003; 50(4): 319 - 322. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |