CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ide, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goto, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ide, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goto, F.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 50:450-453 (2003)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2003

Regional Anesthesia and Pain

Epidural abscess in a patient with dorsal hyperhidrosis

[Un abcès péridural chez un patient souffrant d’hyperhidrose dorsale]

Masanobu Ide, MD, Shigeru Saito, MD, Masayuki Sasaki, MD and Fumio Goto, MD

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, Gunma University School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Shigeru Saito, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, Gunma University School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan. Phone: +81-27-220-8454; Fax: +81-27-220-8473; E-mail: shigerus{at}showa.gunma-u.ac.jp


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: To report the management of a patient who developed a lumbar epidural abscess when an epidural catheter was placed three years after a thoracic sympathectomy. The possible contribution of hyperhidrosis is discussed.

Clinical features: A 62-yr-old male had compensatory hyperhidrosis in his back after thoracic sympathectomy. The patient, who suffered from thromboangeitis obliterans, underwent lumbar (L2–3) epidural catheterization in order to improve arterial circulation and ameliorate resting pain in his left leg. On the third day after catheterization, the patient complained of a dull pain in his back. Emergency magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 12-mm abscess in the epidural space. On the tenth day after catheterization, laminotomy at the 3–4 lumbar vertebrae and local drainage were performed. A 14-mm abscess was removed from the epidural space. The patient was discharged on day 21 after catheterization without any disability.

Conclusion: Special precautions against infection may be necessary in patients with hyperhidrosis in the area where continuous epidural catheterization is attempted.


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case
 Discussion
 References
 
EPIDURAL abscess is a rare but serious complication of epidural anesthesia.1 It can occur either spontaneously or following epidural anesthesia. Herein we report the management of a patient who had undergone thoracic sympathectomy and who developed a lumbar epidural abscess when an epidural catheter was placed three years after sympathectomy. Compensatory sweating in the back following sympathectomy was considered to be an etiological factor of the local infection.


    Case
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case
 Discussion
 References
 
A 62-yr-old male was diagnosed with thromboangeitis obliterans. The patient did not have any immunosuppressive disease, such as malignancy, renal failure, alcoholism, drug abuse, and was not under steroid therapy. Three years previously, bilateral endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy was performed for symptoms in the upper extremities. Compensatory hyperhidrosis was observed in his back after the sympathectomy. One year previously, he had right lumbar sympathectomy, and six months previously, he had left lumbar sympathectomy. At the time of admission, his general condition was good but he had severe resting ischemic pain in his left leg, despite treatment with limaprost alfadex (30 µg•day-1) and sarpogrelate hydrochloride (300 mg•day-1). The patient underwent lumbar (L2–3) epidural catheterization in order to improve arterial circulation and ameliorate resting pain in his left leg. At the time of catheterization at the pain clinic, the physician washed his hands with chlorhexidine gluconate and wore sterile surgical gloves. The site of insertion and surrounding area were cleaned three times with 5% chlorhexidine gluconate and a sterile surgical drape with a round aperture (10 cm diameter) was used on the patient’s back. A 17-G Tuohy needle and a 950-mm epidural catheter with a diameter of 1 mm were used for the insertion. The catheter had a side hole and an end hole, and a membrane filter with a pore size of 0.2 micron was attached between the end of the catheter and the disposable continuous infusor (Daiken-Ika Inc., Tokyo, Japan). All of the instruments came from a sterile epidural catheterization kit. The infusor was prepared aseptically in the pain clinic. Epidural catheterization was completed without incident in a single trial with loss of resistance to air. The site of insertion was covered with a sterile, water and bacteria proof wound dressing (8 cm x 10 cm) with a gauze pad (4 cm x 6.5 cm) at the centre of the dressing.

Following continuous epidural analgesia with 0.25% bupivacaine 2 mL•hr-1, resting pain and cyanosis in the left leg dissipated. Although he was taking oral limaprost alfadex and sarpogrelate hydrochloride, laboratory examinations showed no coagulation abnormality. The infusor was filled with 96 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, every 48 hr. The site of insertion was cleaned with chlorhexidine gluconate and the surgical dressing was changed every day by a practitioner wearing sterile gloves. However, due to excessive sweating of his back, nurses found that the dressing became saturated with perspiration within a day. No neurological symptoms were observed in either leg, with the exception of a slight numbness secondary to the effects of the local anesthetic infusion.

On the third day after catheterization, the patient complained of dull pain in his back. Upon removing the surgical dressing, the physician noted a 5-mm area of erythema surrounding the insertion site. The catheter was removed immediately. No neurological symptoms were observed in the lower extremities. Body temperature was 37.8°C. Blood tests revealed 7800•dL-1 leucocytes and 6.5 unit C-reactive protein (CRP). Administration of antibiotics (piperacillin 2 g•day-1, cefmetazole 2 g•day-1) was started immediately. However, on the fourth day after catheterization, the erythematous area had expanded. One millilitre of yellow exudate was aspirated from the insertion point and sent for bacterial culture. Beginning on day five, local inflammation gradually subsided, but CRP and white blood cell count continued to increase. Fever and low back pain persisted. Emergency magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 12-mm abscess in the epidural space (FigureGo). Cultures of the removed catheter and exudate obtained on the fourth day revealed staphylococcus aureus infection. Blood culture, sampled on the third day, revealed no bacteria in blood. Since the patient’s symptoms of infection did not improve over the following six days, the patient and his family agreed that he should undergo laminotomy and local drainage.



View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE Sagittal magnetic resonance image (MRI) of the vertebral column. Emergency MRI revealed a 12-mm abscess in the epidural space.

 
On the tenth day after catheterization, laminotomy at the 3–4 lumbar vertebrae and local drainage were performed. A 14-mm abscess was drained from the epidural space. The patient became consistently afebrile on the fourth day postsurgery. Back pain disappeared within three days after the operation. Motor and sensory function were not disturbed at any point during this period. The patient was discharged on day 21 after catheterization.


    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case
 Discussion
 References
 
The reported incidence of spinal epidural abscess after epidural analgesia varies widely. Kindler reported the incidence as 1:130002 and Wang as 1:1930.3 In the report by Wang, the majority of patients with epidural abscess were immunocompromised.3 Diabetes mellitus, corticosteroid use or anticoagulant therapy are well known risk factors for infection.4 In the case reported here, the patient was not immunosuppressed. We suspect that the compensatory hyperhidrosis in his back may have contributed to the infection. We speculate that bacteria on the surface of the skin multiplied in the humid environment and eventually contaminated the epidural space. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common causative organism in epidural abscesses, accounting for more than 60% of cases.5 In this case, we were able to culture the bacteria from the infected site. Staphylococcus aureus was the single bacteria detected in this case. This bacteria exists anywhere and can be transmitted not only from skin but also through blood.5 Staphylococcus epidermidis is another common bacteria causing catheter colonization and infection.6 However, staphylococcus epidermidis was not cultured in this case.

Compensatory sweating is a common complication of thoracic sympathectomy. Herbst reported the incidence as 67.4%,7 and Zacherl reported it as 67%.8 A combination of thoracic sympathectomy and lumbar epidural anesthesia is not uncommon in patients with thromboangeitis obliterans.9 Since ischemic symptoms often appear first in the upper extremities, patients commonly undergo thoracic sympathectomy in the early phase of the disease. Later, when the ischemic symptoms become apparent in the lower extremities, patients often have lumbar epidural blocks in order to relieve pain and to prevent vascular contraction. Permanent lumbar sympathectomy may be scheduled when the epidural block improves circulation in the legs.

Although several case reports describe the successful management of an epidural abscess using conservative therapy with antibiotics,10,11 surgical intervention is recommended in most of the available literature.3 In a review by Kindler, 76% of patients underwent laminectomy or other surgery.2 The time elapsed between the first symptoms and the surgical treatment was six days in this case. In patients with an epidural abscess, delay in diagnosis and therapeutic intervention can result in severe morbidity. Wang reported four cases with long-lasting neurologic deficits among their nine epidural abscess cases.3 Early diagnosis and immediate initiation of treatment are crucial to prevent permanent disability.

In the case presented, the site of catheter insertion received regular daily care. Still, infection could not be prevented, suggesting that more intensive care against infection may be required in patients with hyperhidrosis. To avoid infections, Smedstad recommended full aseptic precautions at the time of catheterization, such as use of scrub, gloves, gown and mask by the practitioner, and aseptic preparation of the patient using standard surgical antiseptic solutions.12 Furthermore, Brookman and Rutledge recommended use of a closed drug delivery system, minimal bag changes, topical antiseptic and more frequent changes of dressing and filters.5 Bernard et al. reported a high incidence of catheter infection in cases of continuous peripheral nerve blocks.13 Thus, the precautions against infection mentioned above should probably be universal. Alternatively, practitioners may choose to be more conservative when considering the potential risks of epidural anesthesia in patients with hyperhidrosis.


    Footnotes
 
This publication was supported by a Grant-in-Aid from the Japanese Ministry of Education and Science.

Revision received February 13, 2003. Accepted for publication December 5, 2002.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case
 Discussion
 References
 
1 Brown DL. Spinal, epidural, and caudal anesthesia. In: Miller RD (Ed.). Anesthesia, 5th ed., Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000: 1491–519.

2 Kindler CH, Seeberger MD, Staender SE. Epidural abscess complicating epidural anesthesia and analgesia. An analysis of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42: 614–20.[Medline]

3 Wang LP, Hauerberg J, Schmidt JF. Incidence of spinal epidural abscess after epidural analgesia. A national 1-year survey. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1928–36.[Medline]

4 Heller AR, Ragaller M, Koch T. Epidural abscess after epidural catheter for pain release during pancreatitis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 1024–7.[Medline]

5 Brookman CA, Rutledge ML. Epidural abscess: case report and literature review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 428–31.[Medline]

6 Darchy B, Forceville X, Bavoux E, Soriot F, Domart Y. Clinical and bacteriologic survey of epidural analgesia in patients in the intensive care unit. Anesthesiolgy 1996; 85: 988–98.[Medline]

7 Herbst F, Plas EG, Fugger R, Fritsch A. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for primary hyperhidrosis of the upper limbs. A critical analysis and long-term results of 480 operations. Ann Surg 1994; 220: 86–90.[Medline]

8 Zacherl J, Imhof M, Huber ER, et al. Video assistance reduces complication rate of thoracoscopic sympathicotomy for hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 1177–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 Rosenfield K, Isner JM. Disease of peripheral vessels. In: Topol EJ (Ed.). Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1998: 2597–620.

10 Hori K, Kano T, Fukushige T, Sano T. Successful treatment of epidural abscess with a percutaneously introduced 4-French catheter for drainage. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 1384–6.[Medline]

11 Nordberg G, Mark H. Epidural abscess after epidural analgesia treated successfully with antibiotics. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42: 727–31.[Medline]

12 Smedstad KG. Infection after central neuraxial block (Editorial). Can J Anaesth 1997; 44: 235–8.[Free Full Text]

13 Bernard N, Pirat P, Branchereau S, Gaertner E, Capdevila X. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks in 1416 patients: a prospective multicenter study measuring incidences and characteristics of infectious adverse events. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 882 (abstract).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
K. C. Cummings and J. A. Dolak
Case report: Epidural abscess in a parturient with pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy (PUPPP): [Presentation de cas : un abces peridural chez une parturiente qui presente des papules et des plaques prurigineuses urticariennes de la grossesse (PPPUG)].
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2006; 53(10): 1010 - 1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ide, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goto, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ide, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goto, F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS