| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

* From the Departments of Anesthesiology,
and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Peter Chi-Ho Chung, Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, 222, Mai-Chin Road, Keelung, Taiwan, R.O.C. Phone: +886-2-24313131-2777; Fax: +886-2-24313161; E-mail: p654084{at}cgmh.org.tw
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical features: A 61-yr-old male was scheduled for right lung lobectomy. Induction of general anesthesia was smooth, and subsequent resection of the right middle lobe was uneventful. Difficult ventilation with high airway pressure and poor right lung re-expansion prompted repositioning of the double-lumen tube after the resection. The removal of the right middle bronchial clamp and associated right mainstem manipulation caused flooding of blood into the double-lumen tube.
Mindful of the risk of fatal desaturation, the surgeon immediately opened the right mainstem bronchus and cleared the airway. Confirmation of a displaced double-lumen tube prompted the surgeon to insert an endotracheal tube (internal diameter 5.5 mm) from the opened right mainstem bronchus to the left main bronchus to maintain oxygenation. Although bronchoscopic examination confirmed proper location of the reinserted tube, oxygen saturation was not sufficiently (60%) improved. Another 5.5-mm endotracheal tube was inserted, with its tip inside the right upper bronchiole, for further ventilatory support. Finally, a rise in SpO2 to around 95% allowed completion of surgery.
Conclusions: Displacement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube and flooding with clotted blood will result in potentially fatal ventilation difficulties. Repositioning and cleaning of the tube must be prompt to reduce the risk of hypoxemia. Where emergency single-lung ventilation is required, we suggest the utilization of a modified single-lumen endotracheal tube with a shortened cuff-tip length to ensure an adequate margin of safety for mainstem bronchus intubation.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Case report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite the dramatic consequences of replacing the DLT it seems prudent to suggest, that the emergency management of the dislodged left-sided DLT and the associated flooding with blood should be evaluated carefully, within the surgical context. In our case, single-lung ventilation with direct transbronchial endotracheal intubation did not provide sufficient oxygenation, despite cleaning of the airway. There are several possible explanations for this failure. Firstly, flooding of the surgical field with fresh blood may obstruct the upper orifice of the left mainstem bronchus of the dependent lung in the left lateral position after the DLT was dislodged. However, a postoperative chest roentgenogram clearly ruled out this possibility in this patient.
Secondly, the cuff-tip length (CTL) of the left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube (3 cm; Kendall, Sher-I-Bronch®) is 1.5 cm shorter than that of the 5.5-mm ETT (4.5 cm; Kendall Curity®). If the endobronchial cuff of the DLT is positioned just below the carina, we estimate that, on average, this will provide a safety margin of 2 cm.2 Using the 5.5-mm ETT (Kendall Curity®) for transbronchial intubation, a CTL of 4.5 cm may cause obstruction or bypass of the left upper lobe orifice. As the length of the left mainstem bronchus in oriental patients is below average, it is reasonable to assume that these patients are at elevated risk for this complication.3 Moreover, the Murphy-eye on the right side of the ETT will tend to lie opposite to the orifice of the left upper bronchiole, thus hindering ventilation. The absence of breathing sounds at the left apex provided further confirmation of this complication. As the left lower lobe typically constitutes just 2025% of total lung volume, ventilation of this segment alone will be associated with a large shunt fraction and inadequate ventilation1,2,4 and oxygenation. Ventilating the left lower lobe increased SpO2 to only 60%. Additional ventilation of the right upper lobe was necessary to produce satisfactory oxygen saturation (up to 95%).
Thus, the design of the single-lumen ETT restricted its effectiveness to provide adequate single-lung ventilation, even though the position of the cuff just past the carina was confirmed by direct fibreoptic bronchoscopy. When no suitable short-cuff ETT is available in an emergency situation, cutting the bevelled tip of the ETT will reduce CTL, reducing the risk of left upper lobe obstruction during transbronchial intubation.46 Modification of the endotracheal tip needs to take into account its original design, however.7 The distal inflating lumen of the conventional single-lumen ETT can be protected by fashioning a small birds mouth aperture (Figure 2
) as opposed to the parallel cutting recommended by other workers.4,5 The modified 3-cm CTL will ensure an adequate safety margin for left upper lobe ventilation, especially in oriental patients3 (Figure 1
). Additionally, it seems reasonable to suggest that such a modification of the ETT may be of value for mainstem bronchial intubation, as a second approach to single-lung isolation in tracheal resection instead of using a Foley catheter8 when high-frequency positive-pressure jet ventilation is not available.6,8,9 Additionally, the shortened CTL decreases the risk of herniation of the cuff over the tracheal carina during outward movement of the ETT to ensure upper lobe ventilation.
|
Revision received March 3, 2003. Accepted for publication January 20, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Benumof JL, Partridge BL, Salvatierra C, Keating J. Margin of safety in positioning modern double-lumen endotracheal tubes. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 72938.[Medline]
3 Chang PJ, Sung YH, Wang LK, Tsai YC. Estimation of the depth of left-side double-lumen endobronchial tube placement using preoperative chest radiographs. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 2002; 40: 259.[Medline]
4 Theman TE, Kerr JH, Nelems JM, Pearson FG. Carinal resection. A report of two cases and a description of the anesthetic technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976; 71: 31420.[Abstract]
5 Lippmann M, Mok MS. Tracheal cylindroma: anesthetic management. Br J Anaesth 1977; 49: 3836.
6 Abou-Madi MN, Cuadrado L, Domb B, Barnes J, Trop D. Anesthesia for tracheal resection: a new way to manage the airway. Can Anaesth Soc J 1979; 26: 268.[Medline]
7 Campos JH. Effects on oxygenation during selective lobar versus total lung collapse with or without continuous positive airway pressure. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 5836.[Abstract]
8 Macnaughton FI. Catheter inflation ventilation in tracheal stenosis. Br J Anaesth 1975; 47: 12257.
9 Baraka A. Oxygen-jet ventilation during tracheal reconstruction in patients with tracheal stenosis. Anesth Analg 1977; 56: 42932.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Slinger Analyzing the replay of a great save/Analyser la reprise d'un sauvetage spectaculaire Can J Anesth, June 1, 2003; 50(6): 538 - 540. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |