| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the University of Toronto, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Richard M. Cooper, University of Toronto, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, 3EN-421, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada. Phone: 416-340-5164; Fax: 416-340-3698; E-mail: richard.cooper{at}uhn.on.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical features: A 74-yr-old male presenting for repeat elective surgery had a history of failed intubations by direct laryngoscopy and pulmonary aspiration with a laryngeal mask airway. He refused awake flexible fibreoptic intubation. After the induction of general anesthesia, laryngoscopy was performed using a GlideScope®. This provided complete glottic exposure and easy endotracheal intubation.
Conclusion: This new videolaryngoscope provided excellent laryngeal exposure in a patient whom multiple experienced anesthesiologists had repeatedly found to be difficult or impossible to intubate using direct laryngoscopy. The clinical role of this device awaits confirmation in a large series of difficult airways.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Case report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Review of the medical records, revealed five previous general anesthetics. On two occasions, the airway was electively managed with a size 4 Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA; The Laryngeal Mask Company, Henley-on-Thames, UK) without incident. Three other times, direct laryngoscopy was attempted. Twice the laryngeal view as described was consistent with a Cormack-Lehane grade III view and once a grade IV view.4 On one of these occasions, endotracheal intubation was achieved with difficulty. On another occasion, intubation was unsuccessful and again a size 4 LMA was easily inserted. Finally, for the remaining procedure, spinal anesthesia was proposed but rejected by the patient. A ProSeal LMA (PLMA; size not recorded) was inserted without difficulty. It appeared to be well seated and positive pressure ventilation was provided, however airway obstruction developed. The record did not indicate how proper placement was confirmed. Ventilation became difficult despite efforts to deepen the level of anesthesia. Regurgitation of gastric contents was noted in the oropharynx and oxygen desaturation developed. The oropharynx was suctioned and the PLMA was removed. A Cormack-Lehane grade IV view was observed by direct laryngoscopyand endotracheal intubation could not be accomplished. Flexible fibreoptic intubation was successful but aspiration and arterial desaturation to a nadir of 87% occurred. The patients clinical condition improved, permitting extubation at the conclusion of the case.
Seven months later, the patient presented for repeat cystoscopic bladder tumour resection. He professed a lack of awareness of any prior anesthetic problems. On examination, he had a normal interincisor gap, thyromental distance, cervical range of motion and a class II Mallampati view.5 He declined the recommendation of awake fibreoptic intubation but agreed to this if laryngoscopy or fibreoptic intubation following induction proved unsuccessful. Sodium citrate was administered and anesthesia was induced with fentanyl, propofol and succinylcholine following preoxygenation. Cricoid pressure was maintained and a videolaryngoscope (GlideScope®, Saturn Biomedical Systems, Burnaby, BC, Canada) was inserted. The glottic opening was readily visualized (Cormack-Lehane grade I) and endotracheal intubation was accomplished using a malleable stylet within approximately 15 sec. At the conclusion of an uneventful case, extubation was performed using a tube exchanger (ETVC, CardioMed Supplies, Gormley, ON, Canada).6 The latter was removed shortly thereafter in the postanesthesia care unit.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The patient was subsequently provided with a "Difficult Airway Letter" and registration with the MedicAlert Foundation was strongly encouraged.1,8 It is important to emphasize that success with an alternative device does not change his designation as a difficult airway (or more precisely, a "difficult laryngoscopy"), particularly when the difficulty is not apparent from examination. As this case illustrates, even a properly informed patient cannot be relied upon as a historian and expertise with a successful alternative technique should be readily available.
Revision received March 14, 2003. Accepted for publication January 24, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Rose DK, Cohen MM. The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41: 37283.
3 Rosenblatt WH, Wagner PJ, Ovassapian A, Kain ZN. Practice patterns in managing the difficult airway by anesthesiologists in the United States. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 1537.
4 Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 110511.[Medline]
5 Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985; 32: 42934.[Medline]
6 Cooper RM. The use of an endotracheal ventilation catheter in the management of difficult extubations. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 903.
7 Cooper SD, Benumof JL, Ozaki GT. Evaluation of the Bullard laryngoscope using the new intubating stylet: comparison with conventional laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 96570.
8 Mark LJ, Beattie C, Ferrell CL, Trempy G, Dorman T, Schauble JF. The difficult airway: mechanisms for effective dissemination of critical information. J Clin Anesth 1992; 4: 24751.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. S. Xue, Q. Y. Yang, N. He, and Y. C. Xu The modified ventilating tube changer to facilitate tracheal intubation using the GlideScope(R) in patients with a limited mouth opening Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2008; 101(1): 126 - 127. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Enomoto, T. Asai, T. Arai, K. Kamishima, and Y. Okuda Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2008; 100(4): 544 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Robitaille, S. R. Williams, M.-H. Tremblay, F. Guilbert, M. Theriault, and P. Drolet Cervical Spine Motion During Tracheal Intubation with Manual In-Line Stabilization: Direct Laryngoscopy versus GlideScope(R) Videolaryngoscopy Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 935 - 941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Belyamani, S. Zidouh, and N. D. Kamili Intubation chez une adolescente souffrant du syndrome Rubinstein-Taybi en utilisant le videolaryngoscope [Intubation using a videolaryngoscope in an adolescent girl with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome] Can J Anesth, January 1, 2008; 55(1): 57 - 58. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Shippey, D. Ray, and D. McKeown Use of the McGrath(R) videolaryngoscope in the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2008; 100(1): 116 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Asai, Y. Enomoto, K. Shimizu, K. Shingu, and Y. Okuda The Pentax-AWS Video-Laryngoscope: The First Experience in One Hundred Patients Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 257 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Cortellazzi, L. Minati, C. Falcone, M. Lamperti, and D. Caldiroli Predictive value of the El-Ganzouri multivariate risk index for difficult tracheal intubation: a comparison of Glidescope(R) videolaryngoscopy and conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2007; 99(6): 906 - 911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Prabhu, D. Wong, S. Chakraborty, E Massicotte, G Tan, and R Cooper 44518 - RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF CERVICAL SPINE MOVEMENT DURING FLEXIBLE VIDEOBRONCHOSCOPY & LO-PRO GLIDESCOPE; A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL Can J Anesth, August 1, 2007; 54(suppl_1): 44518 - 44518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lane and G. Lewis Combined use of a videolaryngoscope and a transilluminating device for intubation Can J Anesth, July 1, 2007; 54(7): 589 - 590. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Shippey, D. Ray, and D. McKeown Case series: The McGrath(R) videolaryngoscope - an initial clinical evaluation: [Serie de cas : Le videolaryngoscope McGrath(R) - une premiere evaluation clinique] Can J Anesth, April 1, 2007; 54(4): 307 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Cooper Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope(R) videolaryngoscope: [Complications suite a l'utilisation du videolaryngoscope GlideScope(R)] Can J Anesth, January 1, 2007; 54(1): 54 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Muallem and A. Baraka Tracheal intubation using the GlideScope(R) with a combined curved pipe stylet, and endotracheal tube introducer Can J Anesth, January 1, 2007; 54(1): 77 - 78. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hirabayashi GlideScope(R) videolaryngoscope facilitates nasotracheal intubation. Can J Anesth, November 1, 2006; 53(11): 1163 - 1164. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Matsumoto, T. Asai, and K. Shingu Truview video laryngoscope in patients with difficult airways. Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 492 - 493. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Hung and J. A. Law Advances in airway management Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(6): 628 - 631. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Falco-Molmeneu, F. Ramirez-Montero, R. Carregui-Tuson, N. Santamaria-Arribas, T. Gallen-Jaime, and M. Vila-Sanchez The modified Eschmann guide to facilitate tracheal intubation using the GlideScope(R). Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(6): 633 - 634. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Trevisanuto, E. Fornaro, and C. Verghese The GlideScope(R) video laryngoscope: initial experience in five neonates. Can J Anesth, April 1, 2006; 53(4): 423 - 424. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Turkstra, R. A. Craen, D. M. Pelz, and A. W. Gelb Cervical Spine Motion: A Fluoroscopic Comparison During Intubation with Lighted Stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh Laryngoscope Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2005; 101(3): 910 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Cook, G. Lee, and J. P. Nolan The ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature: [Le masque larynge ProSealTM : un examen des publications] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2005; 52(7): 739 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zura, D. J. Doyle, and M. Orlandi Use of the Aintree intubation catheter(R) in a patient with an unexpected difficult airway: [L'usage d'un Aintree intubation catheter(R) dans un cas d'intubation difficile imprevue] Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(6): 646 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Hernandez and D. H. Wong Using a Glidescope for intubation with a double lumen endotracheal tube Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(6): 658 - 659. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Cuchillo and M. A. Rodriguez Considerations aimed at facilitating the use of the new GlideScope(R) videolaryngoscope Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(6): 661 - 661. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Sun, C. B. Warriner, D. G. Parsons, R. Klein, H. S. Umedaly, and M. Moult The GlideScope(R) Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2005; 94(3): 381 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Cooper, J. A. Pacey, M. J. Bishop, and S. A. McCluskey Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope(R)) in 728 patients: [Experience clinique preliminaire avec un nouveau videolaryngoscope (GlideScope(R)) chez 728 patients] Can J Anesth, February 1, 2005; 52(2): 191 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Asai Editorial II: Who is at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration? Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 497 - 500. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lim, T.-J. Lim, and E. H.C. Liu Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by inexperienced operators in simulated difficult airways Can J Anesth, June 1, 2004; 51(6): 641 - 642. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Doyle Miniaturizing the GlideScope(R) video laryngoscope system: a new design for enhanced portability Can J Anesth, June 1, 2004; 51(6): 642 - 643. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Cooper Laryngoscopy -- its past and future Can J Anesth, June 1, 2004; 51(suppl_1): R6 - R6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Doyle Awake intubation using the GlideScope(R) video laryngoscope: initial experience in four cases Can J Anesth, May 1, 2004; 51(5): 520 - 521. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Kaplan and G. Berci Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway Can J Anesth, January 1, 2004; 51(1): 94 - 94. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Doyle, A. Zura, and M. Ramachandran Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway Can J Anesth, January 1, 2004; 51(1): 95 - 95. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Cooper REPLY Can J Anesth, January 1, 2004; 51(1): 95 - 96. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Cooper REPLY Can J Anesth, November 1, 2003; 50(9): 966 - 966. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |