| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Jacques E. Chelly, Department of Anethesiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3550 Terrace Street, A-1305 Scaife Hall, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA. Phone: 412-648-9560; Fax: 412-648-1887; E-mail: chelje{at}anes.upmc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Formalin 5% was injected in the hind paw in the presence and absence of NOS inhibitors (e.g., 7-nitro indazole, N-nitro-L-arginine and aminoguanidine). Catheters were chronically implanted to continuously record mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR). MAP, HR and paw lifting time were recorded at control and every five minutes for 35 min following formalin and NOS inhibitors.
Results: Formalin injected into the rat hind paw induced a biphasic nociceptive behaviour: an initial acute phase (phase 1: during zero to five minutes after the formalin injection) followed by a prolonged tonic response (phase 2: beginning about ten minutes after the formalin injection). Aminoguanidine, an inhibitor of the inducible NOS and 7-nitro indazole, an inhibitor of the neuronal NOS, did not affect phase 1, whereas N-nitro-L-arginine, a non-selective NOS inhibitor decreased it (49%). All three NOS inhibitors diminished nociceptive behaviours during phase 2. L-arginine reversed antinociceptive effects of N-nitro-L-arginine in phase 1 and in phase 2. Pressor effects induced by formalin in phase 1 were abolished following all three NOS inhibitors. During phase 2, formalin-induced pressor effects remained unaffected by N-nitro-L-arginine and aminoguanidine but were inhibited by 7-nitro indazole.
Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that NO is predominantly generated by vascular endothelial NOS in phase 1 and phase 2, whereas the neuronal NOS and the inducible NOS exhibit antinociceptive effects through a non-NO related pathway in phases 1 and 2 in rats subjected to the formalin test.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NO is involved in the transmission and modulation of nociceptive information at the periphery, spinal cord and supraspinal level.2 Experimentally, several models of pain have been developed. Among them are the awake rats subjected to the formalin test.35 The formalin test model produces a biphasic response: the early nociceptive response, possibly related to C fibre activation and the late nociceptive response, which appears to be dependent on a combination of inflammatory reactions in the peripheral tissue and facilitation of spinal transmission.6,7 Formalin injection into the plantar surface of the hind paw induces nociceptive behaviour, and this formalin-induced agitation behaviour has been used as a model for animal pain.8 Recently, it has been reported that NOS inhibitors depressed the agitation behaviour when administered by topical application,9 intrathecally10,11 intraperitoneally,2 intracerebroventricularly or orally.2 However, studies on the peripheral role of the NO pathway involved in the mechanism of hyperalgesia have been limited. Although NOS inhibitors apparently have little or no effect on nociceptive transmission under normal conditions,12 there is ample evidence that peripheral inflammation and/or CNS injury increases NOS activity that in turn may underlie numerous abnormal pain-related sensations.1315
Thus, this study was designed to assess the systemic effects of NOS inhibitors e.g., N-nitro-L-arginine, as a non-selective NOS inhibitor,16 also reported to cause hypertension,17 aminoguanidine, as a specific inhibitor of inducible NOS18 and 7-nitro indazole, as a specific inhibitor of neuronal NOS19 in the presence and in the absence of L-arginine, the precursor of NO synthesis, in the modulation of acute pain and the associated cardiovascular changes in awake rats subjected to the formalin test.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental design
Animals of all groups were placed on a metal mesh screen (20 cm x 20 cm). Rats were divided into six groups. Group 1 received N-nitro-L-arginine at 1 mgkg-1 iv bolus, in the presence (n = 8) and in the absence of L-arginine (n = 8); Group 2 received aminoguanidine, at 30 mgkg-1 iv bolus in the presence (n = 8) and in the absence of L-arginine (n = 8); Group 3 received 7-nitro-indazole at 50 mgkg-1 ip bolus in the presence (n = 8) and in the absence of L-arginine (n = 8); Group 4 (n = 6) received L-arginine alone at 1 gkg-1 over one minute, iv whereas Group 5 (n = 8) received saline and served as the control.
To eliminate the possibility that the pressor effects of N-nitro-L-arginine contributed to analgesia, we assessed the effects of phenylephrine, an
1-adrenoceptor agonist administered in a dose of 50 mgkg-1min-1 iv, on BP and nociceptive behaviours (Group 6; n = 5). The doses of NOS inhibitors and L-arginine were chosen based on data previously reported by Gardiner et al. in 1990 in awake rats.17
To evaluate paw edema in response to formalin injection, we measured the plantar circumference of the formalin-injected paw with a thread to the nearest millimetre according to the method of Eschalier et al.20
Maximum effects (steady-state) following NOS inhibitors or saline administration occur within 30 min. When steady-state was achieved, formalin 5% (30 µL) was injected at the plantar surface of the rat hind paw with a 28-gauge needle attached to a 50-µL Hamilton syringe (PGC Scientifics, Frederick, MD, USA) with PE-10 tubing (ID: 0.28 mm; OD: 0.61 mm Becton-Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA). Systolic and diastolic arterial BP were recorded with a P50 Statham pressure transducer (Gould, Cleveland, OH, USA) connected to the PE-50 arterial catheter. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was electronically derived and simultaneously displayed. HR was continuously recorded with a Gould tachometer (Gould, Cleveland, OH, USA) that was triggered by a differential arterial pressure signal. Baseline MAP and HR measurements were recorded at least 30 min following acclimation and before the initiation of the experiment. MAP and HR were collected at five-minute intervals for 35 min following the formalin injection. The femoral vein was connected to a syringe driver (Medfusion, Medex, Inc., Duluth, GA, USA) from the PE-50 tubing and used for drug administration. Formalin-induced nociceptive behaviours were assessed by an observer blinded to group assignment. Formalin injected into the rat hind paw induced a biphasic lifting behaviour. An initial acute phase (phase 1: during zero to five minutes after the formalin injection) followed by a prolonged tonic response (phase 2: beginning about ten minutes after the formalin injection). Thus, to quantify the formalin responses, the instances of spontaneous paw lifting time was counted at zero to five minutes and at five-minute intervals during ten to 35 min after formalin injection. For data analysis, phase 1 and phase 2 were examined separately. Observations were carried out for a period of 35 min after formalin injection.
Statistical analysis
Hemodynamic and nociceptive changes between groups were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance. When significant, an appropriate multiple comparison method (Dunnetts t test) was applied. In addition, a paired t test was performed between baseline and steady-state in each group. All values are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). P < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nociceptive scoring
Table I
summarizes the effects of NOS inhibitors in the presence and in the absence of L-arginine in rats subjected to the formalin test. Subcutaneous injection of formalin resulted in two-phase nociceptive behaviours in all groups. In the primary phase (phase 1), the response was immediate and lasted up to five minutes following formalin injection whereas phase 2 lasted 30 to 35 min. Figure 1
represents cumulative paw lifting time in (early, zero to five minutes) phase 1 and in (late, ten to 35 min) phase 2 in animals treated with saline, 7-nitro indazole, N-nitro-L-arginine and aminoguanidine following the formalin administration. The administration of aminoguanidine and 7-nitro indazole did not affect paw lifting time in phase 1 whereas N-nitro-L-arginine significantly decreased by 50% paw lifting time in phase 1 following formalin injection. In contrast, paw lifting time was significantly diminished in the presence of 7-nitro indazole by 33%, N-nitro-L-arginine by 38% and aminoguanidine by 76% during phase 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edema formation
Our data demonstrate that the paw injected with formalin was 4 ± 1 mm larger than the non-injected paw. Paw edema remained unchanged in animals treated with N-nitro-L-arginine and 7-nitro indazole whereas paw edema was significantly reduced in aminoguanidine-treated animals (2 ± 1 vs 4 ± 1 mm).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Blockade of NOS by N-nitro-L-arginine reduced the paw lifting time recorded immediately after the formalin administration (phase 1). While the nociceptive responses to peripheral administration of formalin can be modulated by inhibitors of the synthesis of NO, they can also be increased by L-arginine, a precursor of the synthesis of NO. As a result, our data show that the inhibitory effects induced by N-nitro-L-arginine on paw lifting time could be reversed by L-arginine, suggesting that the constitutive NOS enzyme is involved in the NO generation occurring in the early phase following formalin administration. In contrast, the administration of 7-nitro indazole, a specific neuronal NOS inhibitor did not induce any significant changes on phase 1 in response to formalin administration indicating that neuronal NOS plays a minor role in the modulation of pain in the initial phase of the formalin test.
An important aspect of this work is that we have also studied the possible involvement of inducible NOS in the generation of NO in acute pain modulation in rats subjected to the formalin test. Consequently, compounds that selectively inhibit inducible NOS and scavenge peroxynitrite such as aminoguanidine have been shown to exert anti-inflammatory/permeability effects in various experimental models.21,22 Our data demonstrate that aminoguanidine response on paw lifting time remains unchanged in phase 1 in animals subjected to the formalin test. Therefore, the lack of significant effects of aminoguanidine during phase 1 may be considered as evidence that inducible NOS does not contribute to the modulation of pain behaviours in the initial phase of the formalin test.
As compared to phase 1, our data show that all three studied NOS inhibitors, i.e., N-nitro-L-arginine, 7-nitro-indazole and aminoguanidine were effective in decreasing paw lifting time during phase 2. Our data demonstrate that L-arginine also reversed the N-nitro-L-arginine-induced inhibitory behaviour effects in phase 2, but further decreased paw lifting time induced by 7-nitro indazole and aminoguanidine in phase 1 and phase 2. Accordingly, our data indicate that endothelial NOS remains the only isoform involved in phases 1 and 2 in response to formalin injection. Furthermore, our data suggest that neuronal and inducible NOS isoforms induced indirect inhibitory pain behaviours responses likely through a non-specific NO pathway. Although our findings parallelled those reported by Allawi et al.23 suggesting that 7-nitro indazole exerted effects in the periphery which were unrelated to neuronal NOS blockade, they contrast data previously reported by Hao et al.24 in spinally injured rats. The reason for the discrepancy between those two studies is not clear although it may reflect differences in nociceptive stimulus or in the NOS inhibitor used. Our data also indicate that the inhibitory behaviour effects of N-nitro-L-arginine and 7-nitro indazole in phase 2 are not secondary to an anti-edema action because N-nitro-L-arginine and 7-nitro indazole failed to prevent paw edema following formalin injection. In contrast, aminoguanidine significantly decreased paw edema in response to formalin administration, supporting previous data reported in carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia in rats.25 Thus, it may be hypothesized that formalin administration causes cytotoxicity at least in part through peroxynitrite production during inflammation.26,27 Peroxynitrite production has been previously reported in animals subjected to dextran or carrageenan-induced acute inflammation.28 Therefore, our data indicate that aminoguanidine exhibits antinociceptive activity in the formalin model secondary to an anti-inflammatory effect, suggesting that the anti-inflammatory effects induced by aminoguanidine may be related to an inhibition of the expression/activity of the inducible NOS and/or to oxyradical and peroxynitrite scavenging. However, additional in vivo experiments are required to further examine the contribution of inducible NOS in the modulation of pain in animals subjected to the formalin test.
In addition to lifting behaviours, the formalin stimulus induced increases in BP and HR. These findings link those previously described by Yoon et al.29 Despite inhibition of paw lifting time, NOS inhibitors affected differently the associated increases in BP and HR in awake rats subjected to the formalin administration. Although all NOS inhibitors inhibited the initial tachycardia (phase 1), they had little effect on the increase in HR observed during phase 2 following formalin administration. Similarly, the pressor effects induced by formalin administration were inhibited by all three NOS inhibitors during phase 1 while the pressor effects induced by formalin were inhibited by only one NOS inhibitor, 7-nitro indazole during phase 2. However, prior to formalin administration, N-nitro-L-arginine induced a significant increase in MAP, suggesting endothelial NOS inhibition.30 In order to exclude the possibility that the effects of N-nitro-L-arginine on BP were related to an analgesic effect, the effects of phenylephrine, an
1-adrenoceptor agonist were also examined. Phenylephrine increased the systemic BP to a similar extent as N-nitro-L-arginine, but failed to relieve pain behaviour.
At doses of NOS inhibitors used which produce pronounced antinociceptive activity, no changes in animal behaviours were observed or could be detected. Furthermore, no reduction in locomotor activity was apparent. Thus, at doses within the antinociceptive range, all NOS inhibitors used in this study have no detectable sedative or other behavioural effects that might contribute to their antinociceptive effect.
In conclusion, we have reported that endothelial NOS isoform plays a crucial role in phase 1 and in phase 2 whereas neuronal and inducible NOS isoforms modulate pain behaviours through a non-NO related pathway. In addition, our data also suggest that aminoguanidine is likely to exhibit antinociception through an anti-inflammatory effect. Therefore, our data provide direct evidence of the involvement of NO in the modulation of pain and some of the associated cardiovascular changes that have been shown to be independent of nociceptive behaviour and directly related to the level of the pain stimuli. However, further studies to clarify the role of the NO pathway in chronic hyperalgesia are warranted.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Revision received July 21, 2003. Accepted for publication January 28, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Moore PK, Oluyomi AO, Babbedge RC, Wallace P, Hart SL. L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester exhibits antinociceptive activity in the mouse. Br J Pharmacol 1991; 102: 198202.[Medline]
3 Abbott FV, Franklin KB, Westbrook RF. The formalin test: scoring properties of the first and second phases of the pain response in rats. Pain 1995; 60: 91102.[Medline]
4 Taylor BK, Peterson MA, Basbaum AI. Persistent cardiovascular and behavioral nociceptive responses to subcutaneous formalin require peripheral nerve input. J Neuroscience 1995; 15: 757584.[Abstract]
5 Tjolsen A, Berge OG, Hunskaar S, Rosland JH, Hole K. The formalin test: an evaluation of the method. Pain 1992; 51: 517.[Medline]
6 Hunskaar S, Hole K. The formalin test in mice: dissocation between inflammatory and non-inflammatory pain. Pain 1987; 30: 10314.[Medline]
7 Coderre TJ, Vaccarino AL, Melzack R. Central nervous system plasticity in the tonic pain response to subcutaneous formalin injection. Brain Res 1990; 535: 1558.[Medline]
8 Dubuisson D, Dennis SG. The formalin test: a quantitative study of the analgesic effects of morphine, meperidine, and brainstem stimulation in rats and cats. Pain 1977; 4: 16174.[Medline]
9 Haley JE, Dickenson AH, Schachter M. Electrophysiological evidence for a role of nitric oxide in prolonged chemical nociception in the rat. Neuropharmacology 1992; 31: 2518.[Medline]
10 Goettl VM, Larson AA. Nitric oxide mediates long-term hyperalgesic and antinociceptive effects of the N-terminus of substance P in the formalin assay in mice. Pain 1996; 67: 43541.[Medline]
11 Malmberg AB, Yaksh TL. Spinal nitric oxide synthesis inhibition blocks NMDA-induced thermal hyperalgesia and produces antinociception in the formalin test in rats. Pain 1993; 54: 291300.[Medline]
12 Meller ST, Gebhart GF. Nitric oxide (NO) and nociceptive processing in the spinal cord. Pain 1993; 521: 12736.
13 Meller ST, Pechman PS, Gebhart GF, Maves TJ. Nitric oxide mediates the thermal hyperalgesia produced in a model of neuropathic pain in the rat. Neuroscience 1992; 50: 710.[Medline]
14 Verge VM, Xu Z, Xu XJ, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z, Hokfelt T. Marked increase in nitric synthase mRNA in rat dorsal root ganglia after peripheral axotomy: in situ hybridization and functional studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 1161721.
15 Semos ML, Headley PM. The role of nitric oxide in spinal nociceptive reflexes in rats with neurogenic and non-neurogenic peripheral inflammation. Neuropharmacology 1994; 33: 148797.[Medline]
16 Alderton WK, Cooper CE, Knowles RG. Nitric oxide synthases: structure, function and inhibition. Biochem J 2001; 357: 593615.[Medline]
17 Gardiner SM, Compton AM, Kemp PA, Bennett T. Regional and cardiac haemodynamic effects of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester in conscious, Long Evans rats. Br J Pharmacol 1990; 101: 62531.[Medline]
18 Joly GA, Ayres M, Chelly F, Kilbourn RG. Effects of NG-methyl-L-arginine, NG-nitro-L-arginine, and aminoguanidine on constitutive and inducible nitric oxide synthase in rat aorta. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1994; 199: 14754.[Medline]
19 Moore PK, Wallace P, Gaffen Z, Hart SL, Babbedge RC. Characterization of the novel nitric oxide synthase inhibitor 7-nitro indazole and related indazoles: antinociceptive and cardiovascular effects. Br J Pharmacol 1993; 110: 21924.[Medline]
20 Eschalier A, Kayser V, Guilbaud G. Influence of a specific 5-HT3 antagonist on carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia in rats. Pain 1989; 36: 24955.[Medline]
21 Szabo C, Ferrer-Sueta G, Zingarelli B, Southan GJ, Salzman AL, Radi R. Mercaptoethylguanidine and guanidine inhibitors of nitric-oxide synthase react with peroxynitrite and protect against peroxynitrite-induced oxidative damage. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 90306.
22 Doursout MF, Kilbourn RG, Hartley CJ, Chelly JE. Comparison of responses to aminoguanidine and N-methyl-L-arginine in a porcine endotoxin shock model. In: Moncada S, Toda N, Maeda H, Higgs EA (Eds.). The Biology of Nitric Oxide, Part 6. London: Portland Press Proceedings; 1998: 219.
23 Allawi HS, Wallace P, Pitcher A, Gaffen Z, Bland-Ward PA, Moore PK. Effect of 7-nitro indazole on neurotransmission in the rat vas deferens: mechanisms unrelated to inhibition of nitric oxide synthase. Br J Pharmacol 1994; 113: 2828.[Medline]
24 Hao JX, Xu XJ. Treatment of a chronic allodynia-like response in spinally injured rats: effects of systemically administered nitric oxide synthase inhibitors. Pain 1996; 66: 3139.[Medline]
25 Duarte ID, Lorenzetti BB, Ferreira SH. Peripheral analgesia and activation of the nitric oxide-cyclic GMP pathway. Eur J Pharmacol 1990; 186: 28993.[Medline]
26 Ischiropoulous H, Zhu L, Beckman JS. Peroxynitrite formation from macrophage-derived nitric oxide. Arch Biochem Biophys 1992; 298: 44651.[Medline]
27 Beckman JS, Ischiropoulos H, Zhu L, et al. Kinetics of superoxide dismutase- and iron-catalyzed nitration of phenolics by peroxynitrite. Arch Biochem Biophys 1992; 298: 43845.[Medline]
28 Cuzzocrea S, Zingarelli B, Calapai G, Nava F, Caputi A. Zymosan-activated plasma induces paw oedema by nitric oxide and prostaglandin production. Life Sci 1997; 60: 21520.[Medline]
29 Yoon MH, Yaksh TL. The effect of intrathecal gabapentin on pain behavior and hemodyanmics on the formalin test in the rat. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 4349.
30 Rees DD, Palmer RM, Schulz R, Hodson HF, Moncada S. Characterization of three inhibitors of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vitro and in vivo. Br J Pharmacol 1990; 101: 74652.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |