CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 50:R5 (2003)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2003


Saturday June 21st, 2003

Evidence-based management of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Tong J. Gan, MB FRCA FFARCS(I)

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Tong J. Gan, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Phone: 919-681-4660; Fax: 919-681-7901; E-mail: gan00001{at}mc.duke.edu.

POSTOPERATIVE nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common complications following surgery. Prior to the 1960s, when older inhalational agents such as ether and cyclopropane were widely used, the incidence of vomiting was reported to be as high as 60%.1,2 Better anesthetic techniques, along with a new generation of antiemetics and shorter acting anesthetic drugs, reduced the incidence of PONV to about 30% in today’s practice. Nevertheless, PONV still occurs, with an incidence as high as 60–70% in some high-risk patients.3,4 Pediatric populations are not spared from PONV. While the incidence may be lower in children less than two years of age,5,6 some procedures, tonsillectomies and strabismus surgery, are associated with high incidence of PONV.7,8 Ambulatory patients appear to have lower incidence of PONV compared with in-patients,9 but this could be related to the fact that postdischarge nausea and vomiting are not recognized. While PONV is rarely fatal, it is considered one of the most unpleasant postoperative symptoms. Even mild PONV may result in delayed hospital discharge, decreased patient satisfaction and increased use of resources, including medical and nursing care and other supplies.10 Avoiding PONV is very important to patients. They rated avoiding PONV more important than avoiding pain postoperatively.11 Patients are willing to spend up to US $100 out of their pocket for an effective antiemetic.12

Consensus guidelines on PONV management

The management of PONV is complex and there is literature supporting the use of every antiemetic available in practice. Hence, it is often difficult for practitioners to adopt an evidence-based practice for PONV management. Recently, a multidisciplinary panel of experts convened to review the medical literature on PONV and to produce guidelines for the management PONV.13 The panel consulted the medical literature for level of evidence rating scales that were pertinent and widely used, then adapted them to the body of scientific literature relating to PONV.14,15 In the absence of published data, recommendations were made on the basis of expert opinion. The following scales were used in rating the guidelines:

Level of evidence based on study design

  1. Large randomized, controlled trial, n >= 100 per group
  2. Systematic review
  3. Small randomized, controlled trial, n < 100 per group
  4. Nonrandomized, controlled trial or case report
  5. Expert opinion

Strength of recommendation based on expert opinion

  1. Good evidence to support the recommendation
  2. Fair evidence to support the recommendation
  3. Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against

The aim of this scale was to present information on both the design and the source of the data (I to V) independent of the validity of those data. The quality of the data was judged by the panel, which determined whether the recommendation was good, fair, or insufficient. For instance, a logistic regression analysis that aims to identify risk factors for PONV would fall into level IV since such trials are not randomized. However, information emerging from that study may be judged as "A" by the panel.

Identification of patients at high risk for PONV enables targeting prophylaxis to those who will benefit most from it. Universal PONV prophylaxis is not cost effective, is unlikely to benefit patients at low risk for PONV and would put them at risk from the potential side effects of antiemetic agents. Patient, anesthesia, and surgery related risk factors have been identified (Guideline 1). Anesthesia related risk factors include the use of volatile agents, which cause PONV during the early postoperative period (within 0–2 hr),16 nitrous oxide,17 opioids3,16 and high doses of neostigmine (> 2.5 mg) for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade.15 Patient related factors include female gender,3,18 history of PONV or motion sickness3,18,19 and non-smoking status.3,19 High levels of anxiety and postoperative pain, especially of pelvic or visceral origin, may also be associated with a higher incidence of PONV.20–22

According to a recent consensus panel, obesity and the stage of the menstrual cycle do not increase the risk of PONV.13 Long surgical procedures (each 30 min increase in duration increases PONV risk by about 60 %)18 and certain types of surgery also carry a greater risk of PONV.4,18,23 In adults, high incidences of PONV are found in intra-abdominal surgery, major gynecological surgery, laparoscopic surgery, breast surgery, neurosurgery, eye and otorhinolaryngology (ENT) surgery. Pediatric operations at high risk for PONV include strabismus, adenotonsillectomy, hernia repair, orchidopexy, penile surgery and middle ear procedures.24,25 Some authors, however, could not demonstrate an association between type of surgery and the risk of PONV.3 The incidence of PONV increases after the age of three years with a peak incidence of about 40% in the 11–14 yr age group.3,25,26 Prior to puberty, gender differences for PONV have not been identified.13

In a study of 2,722 patients, Apfel et al. developed a simplified risk score consisting of four predictors: female gender, history of motion sickness or PONV, non-smoking status and the use of opioids for postoperative analgesia. If none, one, two, three or four of these risk factors were present, the incidences of PONV were ten, 21, 39, 61 and 79% respectively.3

Guideline I. Identify adults at high risk for PONV

Patient-specific risk factors

Anesthetic risk factors

Surgical risk factors

Guideline II. Identify children at high risk for postoperative vomiting (POV)

Risk factors for POV in children are similar to those in adults, with the following differences:

Guideline III. Reduce baseline risk factors for PONV

Approaches for lowering baseline risk factors include:

Guideline IV. Antiemetic therapy for PONV prophylaxis in adults

Serotonin (5-HT3) antagonists

    -Ondansetron (IA)

    -Dolasetron (IA)

    -Granisetron (IA)

    -Tropisetron (IA)

Dexamethasone (IIA)

Droperidol (IA)

Dimenhydrinate (IIA)

Ephedrine (IIIB)

Prochlorperazine (IIIA)

Promethazine (IIIB)

Transdermal scopolamine (IIB)

Nonpharmacologic techniques

    Acupuncture (IIA)

    Hypnosis (IIIB)

Guideline V Antiemetic doses for children

Agent     Dose     Evidence

Ondansetron     50–100 µg•kg –1 up to 4 mg     IIA

Dolasetron     350 µg•kg –1 up to 12.5 mg     V

Dexamethasone     150 µg•kg–1 up to 8 mg    IA

Droperidol    50 – 75 µg•kg–1 up to 1.25 mg    IIA

Dimenhydrinate     0.5 mg•kg–1    IIA

Perphenazine    70 µg•kg–1    IA

Guideline VI Antiemetic treatment for patients with PONV who did not receive prophylaxis or in whom prophylaxis failed

Rule out inciting medication or mechanical causes of PONV (V)

Initial therapy

Failed prophylaxis

Use agent from different class (V) or propofol, 20 mg prn (adults; IIIB)

*Low-dose 5-HT antagonist dosing: ondansetron 1.0 mg; dolasetron 12.5 mg; granisetron 0.1 mg; tropisetron 0.5 mg; **Alternative therapies for rescue: droperidol 0.5 mg iv; dexamethasone (2–4 mg iv); promethazine 12.5 mg iv.

Conclusion

While we have achieved significant advances in the management of PONV, it still occurs frequently in high-risk patients. These guidelines provide a comprehensive, evidence-based reference tool for the management of patients at risk for PONV. Not all surgical patients will benefit from antiemetic prophylaxis, thus identification of patients who are at increased risk is imperative. The major risk factors for PONV are: female gender, non-smoking status, history of PONV/motion sickness, use of volatile anesthetics, nitrous oxide, intraoperative and postoperative opioids, increased duration of surgery, and type of surgery (laparoscopy, ENT, neurosurgery, breast, strabismus, laparotomy, plastic surgery).

The first step in reducing PONV risk is to reduce baseline risk factors among patients at risk (FigureGo). There is increasing evidence that the combination of several potentially beneficial factors (multimodal approach) may lead to an improved outcome.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE Algorithm for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis.

 
Drugs for PONV prophylaxis for adults include the 5-HT3 antagonists: ondansetron, dolasetron, granisetron, and tropisetron; dexamethasone, droperidol, dimenhydrinate, transdermal scopolamine, ephedrine, prochlorperazine, and promethazine. These drugs should be considered for use as monotherapy or in combination for patients at moderate risk for PONV. In general, combinations are more effective than monotherapy. Double and triple antiemetic combinations are recommended for patients at high risk for PONV. All prophylaxis in children at moderate or high risk for POV should be with combination therapy using a 5-HT3 antagonist and a second drug. Antiemetic rescue therapy should be administered to patients who have an emetic episode after surgery. If PONV occurs within six hours postoperatively, patients should not receive a repeat dose of the prophylactic antiemetic. An emetic episode more than six hours postoperatively can be treated with any of the drugs used for prophylaxis except dexamethasone and transdermal scopolamine.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 
References

1 Dent SJ, Ramachandra V, Stephen CR. Post-operative vomiting: incidence, analysis and therapeutic measures in 3000 patients. Anesthesiology 1955; 16: 564.

2 Water RM. Present status of cyclopropane. Br Med J 1936; 2: 1013.

3 Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 693–700.[Medline]

4 Gan TJ, Ginsberg B, Grant AP, Glass PS. Double-blind, randomized comparison of ondansetron and intraoperative propofol to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 1036–42.[Medline]

5 Heyland K, Dangel P, Gerber AC. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1997; 7: 230–3.[Medline]

6 Rose JB, Watcha MF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 104–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7 Ved SA, Walden TL, Montana J, et al. Vomiting and recovery after outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in children. Comparison of four anesthetic techniques using nitrous oxide with halothane or propofol. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 4–10.[Medline]

8 Shende D, Bharti N, Kathirvel S, Madan R. Combination of droperidol and ondansetron reduces PONV after pediatric strabismus surgery more than single drug therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 756–60.[Medline]

9 Visser K, Hassink EA, Bonsel GJ, Moen J, Kalkman CJ. Randomized controlled trial of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane-nitrous oxide - postoperative nausea and vomiting and economic analysis. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 616–26.[Medline]

10 Hill RP, Lubarsky DA, Phillips-Bute B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antiemetic therapy with ondansetron, droperidol, or placebo. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 958–67.[Medline]

11 Macario A, Weinger M, Carney S, Kim A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 652–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12 Gan T, Sloan F, Dear G, El-Moalem HE, Lubarsky DA. How much are patients willing to pay to avoid postoperative nausea and vomiting? Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 393–400.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13 Gan TJ, Meyer TA, Chung CA, et al. Concensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2003 (in press).

14 Tramer MR, Moore A, McQuay H. Omitting nitrous oxide in general anesthesia: meta-analysis of intraoperative awareness and postoperative emesis in randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 186–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15 Tramer MR, Fuchs-Buder T. Omitting antagonism of neuromuscular block: effect on postoperative nausea and vomiting and risk of residual paralysis. A systematic review. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 379–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16 Apfel CC, Katz MH, Krank P. Volatile anaesthetics may be the main cause of early but not dealyed postoperative vomiting: a randomized controlled trial of factorial design. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 1–10.[Free Full Text]

17 Tramer M, Moore A, McQuay H. Omitting nitrous oxide in general anaesthesia: meta-analysis of intraoperative awareness and postoperative emesis in randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 186–93.

18 Sinclair DR, Chung F, Mezei G. Can postoperative nausea and vomiting be predicted? Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 109–18.[Medline]

19 Koivuranta M, Laara E. A survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 413–4.

20 Andersen R, Krohg K. Pain as a major cause of postoperative nausea. Can Anaesth Soc J 1976; 23: 366–9.[Medline]

21 Jenkins LC, Lahay D. Central mechanisms of vomiting related to catecholamine response: anaesthetic implication. Can Anaesth Soc J 1971; 18: 434–41.[Medline]

22 Rees MR, Clark RA, Holdsworth CD. The effect of beta adrenoreceptor agonists and antagonists on gastric emptying in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1980; 10: 551–4.[Medline]

23 Fabling JM, Gan TJ, El-Moalem HE, Warner DS, Borel CO. A randomized, double-blinded comparison of ondansetron, droperidol, and placebo for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after supratentorial craniotomy. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 358–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24 Rowbotham DJ. Current management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69: 46S–59S.

25 Lerman J. Surgical and patient factors involved in postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69: 24S–32S.

26 Rowley MP, Brown TC. Postoperative vomiting in children. Anaesth Intensive Care 1982; 10: 309–13.[Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS