CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kavanagh, B. P.
Right arrow Articles by Laffey, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kavanagh, B. P.
Right arrow Articles by Laffey, J. G.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 50:R9 (2003)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2003


Sunday June 22nd, 2003

Perioperative control of CO2

Brian P. Kavanagh, MB FRCPC and John G. Laffey, MD FFARCSI

From the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Brian P. Kavanagh, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada. Phone: 416-813-6860; Fax: 416-813-5313; E-mail: brian.kavanagh{at}utoronto.ca

CO2, a waste gas, accumulates in the presence of respiratory failure and has characteristically been thought of as a gas to be excreted. Like other waste products, many practitioners thought the less present the better.1 Perhaps because end-tidal CO2 monitoring is now mandatory, anesthesiologists are now continuously aware on a second-to-second basis, of some measure of CO2 flux in their patients. This monitoring imperative, coupled with new insights into oxygenation and carbon dioxide exchange, in addition to the increasing knowledge of the importance of ventilatory technique, means that the anesthesiologist is faced with contemplating "carbon dioxide" issues on a continuous basis.

Control of PaCO2 during anesthesia

The level of arterial CO2 under normal circumstances is tightly controlled in the region of 40 mmHg. Changes in PaCO2 result from altered production or altered elimination. Hypercapnia results from either increased production, decreased elimination, or direct administration of CO2. Increased production characteristically can occur from hyperpyrexia, increased muscle activity and sepsis. In the context of anesthesia, some of the more important causes of increased production include emergence from anesthesia, direct addition of CO2 (e.g., laparoscopy), tourniquet release, and intraoperative catastrophes such as malignant hyperthermia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome or thyroid crisis. Clearance of CO2 is a function of the adequacy of alveolar ventilation with respect to pulmonary perfusion. Alveolar ventilation is reduced with decreased minute ventilation or when the physiologic deadspace is increased. Increases in deadspace in the context of anesthesia can of course occur from inappropriate circuit connection, as well as bronchospasm or impaired pulmonary perfusion. Reduced minute ventilation results from inadequate tidal volume or respiratory rate.

Traditional indications for direct administration of CO2 containing gas mixtures have included the speeding of recovery from anesthesia or to directly produce cerebral vasodilatation. In the modern era this has been replaced by laparoscopy which increases CO2 through direct peritoneal injection of CO2; the respiratory effects are complicated by impairment of abdominal compliance causing reduced minute ventilation, as well as reducing venous return and potentially increasing physiologic deadspace through reduced pulmonary perfusion. Finally, most anesthetics involve some degree of rebreathing, involving a requirement for CO2 scavenging. Depletion of scavenging efficiency or bypass of scavenging systems results in an increased FICO2 which will elevate PaCO2 directly. Finally, an increasingly commonly recognized cause of hypercapnia in critically ill patients includes overfeeding, particularly with excessive carbohydrates.

Measurement of CO2 in the operating room

End-tidal CO2 reflects that proportion of arterial CO2 that is delivered to the pulmonary vascular bed and then detected in the proximal airway. The anesthesiologist frequently uses end-tidal CO2 as a surrogate for arterial CO2 but there are important differences. In the context of increased deadspace, the gradient will be increased and the end-tidal CO2 will be significantly lower (as opposed to just moderately lower) than the arterial CO2 tension. The end-tidal CO2 has additional uses also. First, it can be used to confirm tracheal (as opposed to esophageal) intubation in the presence of intraoperative anesthesia or sedation. In the setting of resuscitation, end-tidal CO2 tension reflects the degree of lung perfusion and hence cardiac output, provided that the endotracheal tube is definitely placed in the trachea. Of course, unless end-tidal CO2 is detected, in the setting of resuscitation, the absence of end-tidal CO2 cannot be used to distinguish between the misplacement of an endotracheal tube and absence of pulmonary perfusion. Finally, the shape of the end-tidal CO2 trace can indicate the cause of increased deadspace where bronchospasm results in a upwardly sloping expiratory curve because of inhomogeneous emptying of alveolar lung units. Aside from physiology, alterations in end-tidal CO2 give valuable warnings to the anesthesiologist. An increase in end-tidal CO2 always means an increase in arterial CO2, affecting either increased production or diminished minute ventilation. A reduction in end-tidal CO2 however can mean reduced CO2 production, increased clearance or increased gradient. Importantly, for the anesthesiologist, a reduced end-tidal CO2 may reflect inadequate pulmonary perfusion and cardiac output, and an abrupt drop in end-tidal CO2 may be the first sign of a pulmonary embolism (thrombo-embolic or venous air embolism).

An additional series of gradients exist that are becoming increasingly important to the anesthesiologist. Although traditionally, anesthesiologists have measured arterial and/or end-tidal CO2, direct assessment of tissue CO2 is increasingly recognized as a marker of tissue ischemia. The best described methods include gastric tonometry, where a tonometer (sampling line) lies in the stomach in direct connection with the gastric mucosa, and the contents of the tonometric line reach equilibrium with the gastric mucosal cells.2 A decrease in cellular gastric intramucosal pH is thought to reflect adverse mucosal oxygen supply/demand balance, reflected in either reduced gastric intramucosal pH or increased gastric intramucosal CO2. In order to correct for arterial levels of CO2 tension, this is perhaps best corrected for PaCO2, and expressed as the intramucosal to arterial CO2 gradient.

A final measure of CO2 of potential interest to anesthesiologists is global mixed venous to arterial CO2 gradient. Elevation of this gradient reflects inadequate oxygen delivery and excess accumulation of CO2 in the mixed venous blood. This is a marker of reduced global delivery of oxygen and cardiac output.

Hypocapnia – perioperative causes

The usual cause of perioperative hypocapnia is excessive mechanical ventilation.3 This is usually inadvertent or in many cases simply ignored. In the vast majority of situations it is without adverse effect. Additional causes of low PaCO2 aside from increased alveolar ventilation, include reduced production, most commonly secondary to a hypothermia-induced low metabolic rate.

Hypocapnia – potential benefits

There are some good reasons for inducing acute hypocapnic alkalosis.3 For patients who have life-threatening elevations in intracranial pressure and who are in danger of coning (brainstem herniation), rapid induction of hypocapnia through hyperventilation is mandatory, in conjunction with adjunct therapies (mannitol, hypertonic saline) while definitive diagnosis or therapy is attempted. Similarly, neonatal patients with severe pulmonary hypertensive crisis can be dramatically improved by induction of hypocapnia. However, there are very few other situations where hypocapnia is of benefit.

Hypocapnia – experimental evidence of risks

Hypocapnia may adversely affect global organ oxygen supply/demand balance by decreasing systemic oxygenation,4,5 decreasing oxygen unloading at the tissue level, and concurrently increasing organ metabolic demand.

Neurologic
Hypocapnia reduces cerebral oxygen supply by decreasing cerebral blood blow, and severe hypocapnia may result in global and regional cerebral ischemia. Furthermore, in experimental acute focal ischemia, hypocapnia increases the size of the region at risk of ischemia, and in combined global and ischemic injury in the immature brain, hypocapnia worsens the histologic magnitude of stroke.6 Hypocapnia further exacerbates the cerebral oxygen supply/demand imbalance by increasing neuronal excitability,7 via a direct effect on the neuronal membrane. In the clinical context hypocapnia induced critical cerebral ischemia has been demonstrated following cardiac arrest, and in children with head injury.8 Hypocapnia during resuscitation increases functional and histologic evidence of brain injury following experimental cardiac arrest in dogs.9

Pulmonary
Adverse pulmonary consequences of experimentally induced hypocapnia have been described in terms of effects on airways, alveolar-capillary permeability, lung compliance, pulmonary vasculature, as well as overall impact on lung injury. Hypocapnia causes and potentiates bronchoconstriction.10 At a localized level, this may reduce excessive ventilation, and would be beneficial in the context of localized pulmonary perfusion deficits (e.g., pulmonary emboli). However, generalized bronchoconstriction in response to hypocapnia may have deleterious consequences, particularly in patients with asthma. Hypocapnia increases microvascular permeability, in both tracheal mucosa, and the alveolar-capillary barrier.11 This may be important in the pathogenesis of pulmonary edema. Hypocapnia decreases lung compliance in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease probably as a result of altered surfactant production. Alveolar hypocapnia attenuates hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, worsening intrapulmonary shunt and systemic oxygenation.5 Experimental hypocapnia causes profound acute parenchymal lung injury,12 that may be ameliorated by normalization of alveolar PCO2 with increasing FICO2, and worsens ischemia-reperfusion induced lung injury.11

Myocardial
Hypocapnia adversely impacts on myocardial O2 supply/demand balance and may increase the risk of myocardial ischemia. Experimental hypocapnia increases coronary vascular resistance, reduces coronary blood flow and myocardial O2 delivery and left ventricular performance and reduces collateral flow in experimental myocardial ischemia.13 Hypocapnia also increases O2 demand by increasing myocardial contractility. Finally, myocardial oxygenation may be additionally compromised at the microvascular level, because alkalosis increases myocardial capillary permeability. These findings may explain the mechanism of hypercapnia-induced accentuation of ischemic injury in the neonatal lamb myocardium.14

Hypocapnia – clinical evidence of risks

There is an increasing body of physiological – and outcome – data from clinical studies indicating adverse consequences of hypocapnia in clinical contexts of direct relevance to anesthesiologists.

Neurologic
Hypocapnia may cause prolonged neurologic dysfunction in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Indices of psychomotor function following emergence from general anesthesia indicate that otherwise healthy patients subjected to hypocapnia are significantly impaired for up to 48 hr.15 Hypocapnic ventilation resulted in worse postanesthetic neuropsychological performance compared with normocapnic ventilation, in terms of increased time to regain consciousness, prolonged reaction times, poorer flicker-fusion and digit span scores, as well as longer track tracing times and counting-down times.15 Similar findings have been reported in other studies,16 and the effects appear to be especially pronounced in older patients.15 The role of CO2 in these studies is underscored by the finding that exposure to hypercapnia in anesthetized patients appears to enhance postoperative neuropsychologic performance.15 The effects of hypocapnia in these studies of essentially healthy patients, while often prolonged, were reversible. However the potential clearly exists for hypocapnia to cause permanent psychomotor changes in susceptible patients.

Hypocapnia has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of adverse outcome in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. In one report, severe hypocapnia has been implicated in the pathogenesis of neurologic damage postcardiopulmonary bypass.17 Alpha-stat management of blood gases during cardiopulmonary bypass, resulting in lower systemic CO2 levels, has been demonstrated to worsen cerebrovascular status.18

These concerns are compounded by evidence of prolonged adverse neurological outcome following severe hypocapnia induced by hyperventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).19 Hypocapnia pre-ECMO has been associated with an increased incidence of sensorineural hearing loss in school age children.19 Finally, prophylactic hyperventilation of head injured patients, formerly employed in order to reduce intracranial pressure, has been clearly associated with worsened outcome.20

Pulmonary
The association of hyperventilation, hypocapnia and worsened acute lung injury is increasingly well documented. In fact, hypocapnia has long been implicated in the pathogenesis of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).21 In 1971, Trimble et al. demonstrated that hypocapnia increased airway resistance, increased work of breathing, worsened ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) matching, increased alveolar-arterial O2 gradient and decreased PaO2 in patients diagnosed with what was then termed post-traumatic pulmonary insufficiency.21 Both hyperventilation and hypocapnia have been identified as independent determinants of long term pulmonary dysfunction in patients with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Clinical data confirms that hypocapnia may contribute to airway obstruction and bronchospasm in asthmatic patients.22

Myocardial
Hypocapnia may contribute to the development of clinical relevant acute coronary syndromes in patients with coronary disease undergoing anesthesia. Hypocapnia reduces cardiac performance in these patients, primarily through increasing systemic vascular resistance. In the critically ill, hypocapnia has been clearly linked to the development of arrythmias.23

Hypercapnia – perioperative causes

The causes of intraoperative hypercapnia have been reviewed earlier and several are of particular interest to the anesthesiologist, including laparoscopy, and anesthesia associated catastrophes including malignant hypothermia. In addition, shivering on awakening is associated with elevated production of CO2. It is not clear whether elevated CO2 is harmful or beneficial in the context but it certainly marks disordered physiology.

Hypercapnia – potential benefits

Hypercapnia has been progressively accepted in critical care in perioperative medicine for patients with lung injury or asthma. This is called permissive hypercapnia and in principle reflects the growing acceptance that excessive tidal stretch is harmful and that with reduced tidal stretch, there is an obligatory elevation in arterial CO2. This is reflected in the results of almost all the major trials of ventilatory strategy in ARDS where minute ventilation and tidal volume have been reduced, resulting in this hypercapnic state. For ARDS the idea was first proposed by Hickling et al.24,25 but was initially demonstrated in neonatal respiratory failure by Wung et al. from Columbia University, New York.26 Thus, permissive hypercapnia can benefit a patient with lung injury or asthma because the lung stretch, which is likely injurious, is reduced. In this setting the hypercapnia is tolerated and intensivists and anesthesiologists have become "used" to the hypercapnia and, as their practice evolves, see it as less of a threat to the patient. Potential downsides from permissive hypercapnia have been reviewed in detail,27 and they include elevated intracranial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance or potentially increased sympathetic or mimetic activity.

Hypercapnia may result in beneficial effects at a cellular level through augmentation of O2 supply and demand, inhibition of free radical activity, and inhibition of cellular enzyme systems. At an organ level, hypercapnia may be protective to the central nervous system (CNS), lungs, or heart. The initial indication that hypercapnia had benefits in brain ischemia came from the work of Vannucci et al.,6 who showed in a neonatal animal model of hypoxia ischemia model that supplemental CO2 added to inspired gas resulted in less overall histological brain injury. In addition, neuronal cells in culture have been shown to be far less susceptible to free radical injury, an important component of ischemia reperfusion in the setting of acidosis. More recently pulmonary investigation of hypercapnia focused on models of ischemia reperfusion or stretch induced lung injury. Ex vivo reperfusion models have demonstrated that hypercapnic acidosis is extremely protective against reperfusion injury, and this protection was associated with inhibition of the xanthine oxidase.28 Subsequent work using this model confirmed that the protection afforded by hypercapnic acidosis is superior to that afforded by the equivalent acidemia induced by metabolic acidosis.29 Finally, a stretch induced injury has been shown to be attenuated by hypercapnic acidosis in ex vivo30 and in vivo31 models. Although these effects are dramatic, they have only been reproduced in short term experimental models and the mechanisms are unclear.

Myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury is significantly inhibited by hypercapnic acidosis.14 This has direct application to perioperative care, especially for the anesthetic care of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. A prospective randomized control trial evaluated postoperative cardiac and CNS status in the blood gas management during cardiopulmonary bypass in children undergoing repair of congenital heart disease.18 The blood gas management was with either pH-stat (more CO2 is added) or with alpha-stat approaches. The outcome demonstrated improved cardiovascular function, reduced requirement for hemodynamic support and potentially improved cerebrovascular status in the children managed with the pH-stat approach, suggesting a beneficial role for CO2 in perioperative protection.

Systemic oxygenation
There is increasing evidence that hypercapnia improves oxygenation, although this is not predicted by the classical alveolar gas equation, which would suggest that at a given FIO2 and minute ventilation, increasing the FICO2 would reduce arterial O2. However, the effects appear to be mediated through improved V/Q matching, increased cardiac output and increased mixed venous oxygenation. Whereas beneficial effects in oxygenation are seen in multiple experimental models, these have not been mirrored in severely ill patients with ARDS. In this context, while hypercapnia per se may have effects on increasing V/Q matching and cardiac output, the effects of reduced tidal volume required to achieve hypercapnia may be counterproductive. Thus, there may be significant differences in oxygenation resulting from hypercapnia depending on how the hypercapnia is induced.

Hypercapnia – experimental evidence of risks

Hypercapnia, traditionally thought of as the accumulation of a waste gas, is now being progressively more tolerated by clinicians. However, despite the above-mentioned data indicating protective effects of hypercapnia, there are significant concerns. The biggest concern might be the propensity for CO2 to augment the process of protein nitration whereby peroxynitrate (a derivative of nitric oxide and superoxide ions) may react with - and ‘nitrate’ - proteins, particularly tyrosine amino acids. The evidence for this has come from predominantly in vitro cell culture preparations of pulmonary epithelial cells32,33 wherein hypercapnia increases nitration of tyrosine residues. In the case of surfactant protein A, this increased nitration is associated with functional impairment of the surfactant protein, which may have serious consequences in perioperative care or ARDS. Additional evidence that nitration might be an adverse phenomenon comes from the experience showing that plasma proteins of patients with ARDS have a high degree of nitration and this is associated with functional impairment of these proteins.

Role of buffering in hypercapnia

The use of buffering has been driven by the clinician’s quest to maintain physiology, in this case acid base balance, in as normal a range as possible in very ill patients. Buffering metabolic acidosis with bicarbonate results in an increased production of CO2. Thus, buffering is an important consideration in hypercapnia because CO2 can be directly elevated as a result. An additional important issue is the effect of CO2 on the development and resolution of primary metabolic acidosis. Acidosis may perform an important function during acute illness whereby acidemia, resulting in a negative feedback loop, inhibits the ongoing generation of organic acids.34 In hypercapnia this has been demonstrated also and the effect of lactate inhibition resulting from global hypoxia may be stronger with hypercapnic acidosis vs the infusion of metabolic acid.35 Finally, buffering of hypercapnic acidosis in the setting of lung reperfusion injury results in a worsening of injury compared with the unbuffered state.29

Conclusion

The importance and complexity of inter-relationships between alterations in systemic CO2 tension in acute illness states is increasingly appreciated by the intensivist and anesthesiologist. In the coming years, research efforts should focus on determining the potential mechanisms by which alterations in CO2 tension contribute to the pathogenesis of acute organ injury states. Such insights should advance our understanding of the situations in which hypercapnia or hypocapnia may be helpful or dangerous, and why.

References

1 Laffey JG, Kavanagh BP. Carbon dioxide and the critically ill - too little of a good thing? Lancet 1999; 354: 1283–6.[Medline]

2 Russell JA. Gastric tonometry: does it work? (Editorial). Intensive Care Med 1997; 23: 3–6.[Medline]

3 Laffey JG, Kavanagh BP. Hypocapnia. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 43–53.[Free Full Text]

4 Hickling KG, Joyce C. Permissive hypercapnia in ARDS and its effects on tissue oxygenation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 107: 201–8.

5 Domino KB, Lu Y, Eisenstein BL, Hlastala MP. Hypocapnia worsens arterial blood oxygenation and increases Va/Q heterogeneity in canine pulmonary edema. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 91–9.[Medline]

6 Vannucci RC, Towfighi J, Heitjan DF, Brucklacher RM. Carbon dioxide protects the perinatal brain from hypoxic-ischemic damage: an experimental study in the immature rat. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 868–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7 Huttunen J, Tolvanen H, Heinonen E, et al. Effects of voluntary hyperventilation on cortical sensory responses. Electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic studies. Exp Brain Res 1999; 125: 248–54.[Medline]

8 Skippen P, Seear M, Poskitt K, et al. Effect of hyperventilation on regional cerebral blood flow in head-injured children. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 1402–9.[Medline]

9 Safar P, Xiao F, Radovsky A, et al. Improved cerebral resuscitation from cardiac arrest in dogs with mild hypothermia plus blood flow promotion. Stroke 1996; 27: 105–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10 O’Cain CF, Hensley MJ, McFadden ER Jr, Ingram RH Jr. Pattern and mechanism of airway response to hypocapnia in normal subjects. J Appl Physiol 1979; 47: 8–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11 Laffey JG, Engelberts D, Kavanagh BP. Injurious effects of hypocapnic alkalosis in the isolated lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 399–405.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12 Kolobow T, Moretti MP, Fumagalli R, et al. Severe impairment in lung function induced by high peak airway pressure during mechanical ventilation: an experimental study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 135: 312–5.[Medline]

13 Coetzee A, Holland D, Foex P, Ryder A, Jones L. The effect of hypocapnia on coronary blood flow and myocardial function in the dog. Anesth Analg 1984; 63: 991–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14 Nomura F, Aoki M, Forbess JM, Mayer JE. Effects of hypercarbic acidotic reperfusion on recovery of myocardial function after cardioplegic ischemia in neonatal lambs. Circulation 1994; 90: 321–7.

15 Hovorka J. Carbon dioxide homeostasis and recovery after general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1982; 26: 498–504.[Medline]

16 Gibson TM. Effects of hypocapnia on psychomotor and intellectual performance. Aviat Space Environ Med 1978; 49: 943–6.[Medline]

17 Suwa K. Which blood gas caused the brain damage? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 107(Suppl.): 215–8.

18 du Plessis AJ, Jonas RA, Wypij D, et al. Perioperative effects of alpha-stat versus pH-stat strategies for deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in infants. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 114: 991–1000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19 Graziani LJ, Gringlas M, Baumgart S. Cerebrovascular complications and neurodevelopmental sequelae of neonatal ECMO. Clin Perinatol 1997; 24: 655–75.[Medline]

20 Muizelaar JP, Marmarou A, Ward JD, et al. Adverse effects of prolonged hyperventilation in patients with severe head injury: a randomized trial. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 731–9.[Medline]

21 Trimble C, Smith DE, Rosenthal MH, Fosburg RG. Pathophysiologic role of hypocarbia in post-traumatic pulmonary insufficiency. Am J Surg 1971; 122: 633–8.[Medline]

22 van den Elshout FJ, van Herwaarden CL, Folgering HT. Effects of hypercapnia and hypocapnia on respiratory resistance in normal and asthmatic subjects. Thorax 1991; 46: 28–32.[Abstract]

23 Mazzara JT, Ayres SM, Grace WJ. Extreme hypocapnia in the critically ill patient. Am J Med 1974; 56: 450–6.[Medline]

24 Hickling KG, Henderson SJ, Jackson R. Low mortality associated with low volume pressure limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 1990; 16: 372–7.[Medline]

25 Hickling KG, Walsh J, Henderson S, Jackson R. Low mortality rate in adult respiratory distress syndrome using low-volume, pressure-limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia: a prospective study. Crit Care Med 1994; 22: 1568–78.[Medline]

26 Wung JT, James LS, Kilchevsky E, James E. Management of infants with severe respiratory failure and persistence of the fetal circulation, without hyperventilation. Pediatrics 1985; 76: 488–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27 Feihl F, Perret C. Permissive hypercapnia. How permissive should we be? Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1994; 150: 1722–37.[Medline]

28 Shibata K, Cregg N, Engelberts D, Takeuchi A, Fedorko L, Kavanagh BP. Hypercapnic acidosis may attenuate acute lung injury by inhibition of endogenous xanthine oxidase. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 1578–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29 Laffey JG, Engelberts D, Kavanagh BP. Buffering hypercapnic acidosis worsens acute lung injury. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 141–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30 Broccard AF, Hotchkiss JR, Vannay C, et al. Protective effects of hypercapnic acidosis on ventilator-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 802–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31 Sinclair SE, Kregenow DA, Lamm WJ, Starr IR, Chi EY, Hlastala MP. Hypercapnic acidosis is protective in an in vivo model of ventilator-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 403–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32 Lang JD Jr, Chumley P, Eiserich JP, et al. Hypercapnia induces injury to alveolar epithelial cells via a nitric oxide-dependent pathway. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000; 279: L994–1002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33 Zhu S, Basiouny KF, Crow JP, Matalon S. Carbon dioxide enhances nitration of surfactant protein A by activated alveolar macrophages. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000; 278: L1025–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34 Hood VL, Tannen RL. Protection of acid-base balance by pH regulation of acid production. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 819–26.[Free Full Text]

35 Abu Romeh S, Tannen RL. Amelioration of hypoxia-induced lactic acidosis by superimposed hypercapnea or hydrochloride acid infusion. Am J Physiol 1986; 250: F702–F9.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kavanagh, B. P.
Right arrow Articles by Laffey, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kavanagh, B. P.
Right arrow Articles by Laffey, J. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS